Energy

Next Stop: Ultracapacitor Buses

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Monday, October 19, 2009
  • By Tyler Hamilton

Buses in the Shanghai pilot are made by Sunwin Bus, a Chinese joint venture company with Volvo of Sweden, and uses ultracapacitors manufactured by Shanghai Aowei. Foton America Bus, based in Germantown, TN, will be manufacturing the ultracapacitor buses that will be sold in the United States. The ultracapacitors are made of activated carbon and have an energy density of six watt-hours per kilogram. (For comparison, a high-performance lithium-ion battery can achieve 200 watt-hours per kilogram.) Clifford Clare, chief executive of Foton America, says another 60 buses will be delivered early next year with ultracapacitors that supply 10 watt-hours per kilogram.

"The ones in Shanghai right now have been on the road for three years without incident, without failure whatsoever, which in the bus industry is phenomenal," says Clare, who adds that his company is in talks with New York City, Chicago, and some towns in Florida about trialing the buses. "It will end up being a third generation of the product, which will give 20 miles [of range per charge] or better."

Sinautec is also in discussions with MIT's Schindall about developing ultracapacitors of higher energy density using vertically aligned carbon nanotube structures that give the devices more surface area for holding a charge.

"So far we're able to get twice the energy density of an existing ultracapacitor, but that's not enough," says Schindall. "We're trying to get about five times." Schindall says that this would create an ultracapacitor with one-quarter of the energy density of a lithium-ion battery.

"Right now the [Foton] buses can only go every other stop, a range of about 5 or 10 city blocks, and that's okay for some routes, but here in the Boston area that would be too far [between charging spots]," Schindall adds. "If they could double that, or even quadruple that, it would increase by an order of magnitude the numbers of routes for which it could be a technical solution."

There are some other important limitations. The 41-passenger buses, based on current technology, lose 35 percent of their range when air conditioning is turned on (from about 5 miles to about 3 miles), and have weak acceleration. But even under these conditions, they could still prove practical for municipal, campus, airport, and tourist buses.

"We want to replace a large portion of the diesel fleet in the United States," says Ye. "We do need to have charging stations throughout various points of the network, but as energy density goes up, the number of stations will go down."

Print

Related Articles

Ultracapacitor Startup Gets a Big Boost

An energy storage startup gets new government funding.

Ultracaps Could Boost Hybrid Efficiency

Recent studies point to the potential of ultracapacitors to augment conventional batteries.

Wheel Motors to Drive Dutch Buses

The technology moves out of the lab and into commercial vehicles.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

ecodelta

1 Comment

  • 849 Days Ago
  • 10/19/2009

use small generator

One solution for lower range with Air conditioning would be to use a small power generator to power it, maybe even battety or capacitor assisted.

Reply

cenesdelavega

1 Comment

  • 848 Days Ago
  • 10/20/2009

Re: use small generator

Or better yet, use existing diesel hybrids, (for example the Daimler/BAE serial hybrid) install in-pavement inductive charging stations along the route, thereby converting them into "plug-in" hybrids. This way, the buses become almost all-electric, but with the security of the diesel backup. Contact me at www.opbrid.com for details.

Reply

ryuuguu

45 Comments

  • 849 Days Ago
  • 10/19/2009

US not good market for this

US is not a good market for this.  In greater Tokyo there are lots bus routes where the speed limits on the roads is 40kph~50kph and the bus stops are close together.

Reply

Kevin Bullis

178 Comments

  • 849 Days Ago
  • 10/19/2009

Re: US not good market for this

Note: The original version of this story said that the bus is limited to 30 miles miles per hour. That's true of the ultracapacitor bus in Shanghai, because that's the speed limit there.  But the buses can go much faster--up to 80 mph if necessary, according to the company.

Reply

erbium

340 Comments

  • 849 Days Ago
  • 10/19/2009

even less energy?

batteries hold something like 1/100th to 1/200th the energy of chemical fuels

this holds 5% or 1/20 the energy of batteries.
so overall capacitors hold the energy equivalent of 1/100 * 20 = 1/2000 the energy of chemical fuels?

might as well have hamsters running in a fly wheel inside the bus.  scale this up to capybaras (giant rodents from the Amazon) on a larger wheel.   Feed them some renewable grains and voila!  an eco-friendly bus energy source with at least as much power.  have a 5cents - feed the capybara - recharging station at each bus stop.

I'm all for renewable power sources or sources that can have power fed from the grid, which can be converted to renewable over time.  And it looks like capacitors have a place with their quick discharge, but this looks lame.

BTW, I've seen those declare lithium ion batteries 'safe'.   or safer than gasoline or hydrogen.  On an solar electric car race documentary (on discovery channel) they mentioned that lithium ion batteries, when they catch fire (and appears they can catch fire instead of exploding like Sony laptops or exploding Apples) they burn at 2500o, pretty much unstoppably melting a hole in the concrete below them similar to thermite. 

Reply

gabrielg01

450 Comments

  • 849 Days Ago
  • 10/19/2009

Re: even less energy?

We could place bike pedals at every passenger seat, and then the passengers would collectively run the bus. Americans are obese anyway, so it won't hurt to exercise.

Reply

peter.mcmahan

1 Comment

  • 849 Days Ago
  • 10/19/2009

Re: even less energy?

batteries hold something like 1/100th to 1/200th the energy of chemical fuels

this holds 5% or 1/20 the energy of batteries.

what's your measure? volume? weight? I don't think your comparison is relevant. The whole point is that these buses don't need to store a whole lot of energy -- just enough to get them to the next stop. If the stops are less than a mile apart, it should be simple to store enough energy on board, even at a tiny fraction of the energy density.

Reply

Advertisement

mkogrady

425 Comments

  • 848 Days Ago
  • 10/20/2009

Re: even less energy?

Yes - a mouse powered bus makes sense until you realize the rat turds would cause Hantivirus outbreaks, make people sick and die and then the rider frequency drops off to the point the route is no longer economically feasible. The bus company goes belly up and we're back to walking, riding bikes or taking another form of transportation.

Reply

jarauz

5 Comments

  • 849 Days Ago
  • 10/19/2009

Technology has been in use for several years already

Urban trains in Mannheim and others have been using it for about 3 years already.  Check:

http://electronicdesign.com/Articles/Index.cfm?AD=1&ArticleID=17465&pg=2

for more information.

Reply

chrisjmiller

64 Comments

  • 849 Days Ago
  • 10/19/2009

Re: Technology has been in use for several years already

According to that link, the Mannheim system is used to capture energy from braking and hence improve efficiency - it's not the sole means of energy supply.  On the other hand, haven't Gyrobuses used the same principle (with flywheels instead of ultracaps) since the 1950s?

Reply

flywheelsRbetR

3 Comments

  • 849 Days Ago
  • 10/19/2009

Re: Technology has been in use for several years already

hopefully flywheels will begin to emerge in the USA as the preferred technology to L-Ion batteries and capacitors... capacitors are very unstable and there isn't enough lithium in the world to sustain fully electric vehicles.

Hopefully we will be able to secure funding and complete our work and make this world a much better place by drastically reducing our need for fossil fuel.   

Reply

erbium

340 Comments

  • 849 Days Ago
  • 10/19/2009

Not enuf lithium in the world

supposedly there is only a '10 year supply' of lithium at industrial sites ready to be mined.

The problem with that is there is only a '10 year supply' because when you have 10 years supply you don't go looking for more!

the history of oil and many other natural resources is exactly the same.  For many years (around 100) there has been 'about 10 years left' of oil.   It is just now that we are rounding the peak of oil and the reserves (easy to get to ones) are REALLY running out.

Bolivia for example has vast reserves of lithium, undeveloped, in salt lakes.  Admittedly unstable country, perhaps the peasants would be 'less revolting' if they got a mine to employ them.

Other countries similarly have undeveloped reserves and are spending billions to develop them.  Lithium power sources will NOT replace all other energy storage systems.  However they will be a BIG PART likely of any future energy supply chains for transportation and other uses.

BTW, lithium batteries can be more dangerous than gasoline.  Exploding in laptops, incidents from sony and apple show this, and burn at 2,500degrees, which is quite hot for a fire, and will burn a hole thru concrete.  A solar car racer burned alive in a lithium battery car fire and this was mentioned on show documenting solar car race.

Reply

trans

43 Comments

  • 849 Days Ago
  • 10/19/2009

Just a bit more please

Well, if they want to improve the range they might start by making the front-end of the bus a more aerodynamic than a wall.

Hmmm... Then perhaps a few solar cells on top of the bus itself?

And I imagine a few old fashion lead-acid batteries could provide some helpful reserve power.

But hell, while were at it, add some haptic floor tread to pick-up a little extra juice from all those people getting on and off the bus.

With a little bit of creative thinking I'm sure they could get those buses twice as far up the street per charge.

Reply

colinnwn

88 Comments

  • 849 Days Ago
  • 10/19/2009

Re: Totally Impractical

If you look at the ultimate energy density of the sun (or foot traffic) you will discover that no matter how good solar or haptic energy harvesting gets, the surfaces available on a bus could never provide more than 1/100th of the power required to drive it.

Reply

Advertisement

sjessee

3 Comments

  • 849 Days Ago
  • 10/19/2009

Cap and Tax

Wonderful idea.  Unfortunately, here in USA, Cap and Tax will likely obliterate any fuel cost savings for electric vehicles.

Reply

flywheelsRbetR

3 Comments

  • 849 Days Ago
  • 10/19/2009

Flywheel Energy Storage

Flywheels are far superior to L-Ion on any capacitor.  With turnaround efficiencies in the  90% and having 100% usable energy storage it will be the way of the future.  Any battery regardless of type can never be completely depleted of its energy nor can the be 100% recharged....batteries always must operate at the very top of the energy storage bell curve. What is most frustrating is all of the $$$ being thrown at battery technology and we cannot find any funding to complete our research!!! @#$*&!! 

Reply

JustaGuess

7 Comments

  • 849 Days Ago
  • 10/19/2009

Cap & Tax comment ?

I don't understand the cap & tax comment.  The Cap & trade system certainly is a poor substitute for a better carbon tax solution but they both will place polution costs where they belong, on dirty fuels. 
This worked with controlling acid rain and is a good start controlling CO2.  Of course if you listen to talk radio, you don't believe in climate change.
If dirty fuels cost more, then clean energy can be competitive.  Ultra caps may be good for short trips like city buses but flywheels may serve the same purpose if they meet or exceed the energy storage for the same cost. 

Reply

gabrielg01

450 Comments

  • 849 Days Ago
  • 10/19/2009

This is awesome.

It's a great idea. The buses could be supplemented with some batteries to help out just in case the capacitors run low.

This is the kind of positive thing that the world expects from China (not shutting down Tor, and censoring people).

Reply

carlhage

84 Comments

  • 849 Days Ago
  • 10/19/2009

Ultracap vs NiMH/LiFePO4

Are these ultracaps any better than batteries?

With only a few statistics given, it's hard to tell if ultracaps are better than other batteries, not just high-capacity lithium-ion laptop batteries. For a low capacity but high power (charge & discharge), what matters is kg/W, l/kWh, $/W, and $/kWh.

From the bus web site, it looks like the batteries are 120-144kW, 5.6kWh, 6 minutes of charge time (56kW charge power). At 6Wh/kg that makes them around 1000kG.

Compare that to a NiMH Prius battery-- these ultracaps are about equivalent in capacity and power to 6 batteries (20kW/1.3kWh each), but weigh 270kg for 6. There are no statistics on the bus regarding ultracap cost or volume.

Some of the new high-power lithium technologies have ~10K cycles and charge times around 5-15 minutes, but with more kWh/kg.

The quoted mileage is amazing-- at 1.5kWh/mi it almost seems too good to be true. Compare that to the 3.1kWh/mi Tesla or 2.5kWh/mi Volt.

Reply

david@lang.hm

1 Comment

  • 849 Days Ago
  • 10/19/2009

compare usable energy

since you cannot (quickly) fully charge a battery, and you can't discharge it at high drain very far (as noted above) I've seen estimates that you really only use 15-25% of a batteries theoretical capacity.

If this is correct, then the ultra-capacitors at 5% or so the capacity of the batteries is really at 20-30% of the usable capacity, and with the 10% that they have already achieved, that would be 40-60%

and since the capacitors can charge as fast as you can put power into them (without being damaged, and without wearing out with repeated charge/discharge cycles) it becomes much more feasible to really charge them when you are away from home.

Reply

carterson2

5 Comments

  • 848 Days Ago
  • 10/20/2009

Plus the trolley can pull a wheelie!

This is a great idea. It will definitely get put into place somewhere in the US quickly. Very rarely do you see a win win like this! Well done China.

Reply

Advertisement

cavaretti

2 Comments

  • 848 Days Ago
  • 10/20/2009

New to site

interesting site.  I have an interest in these supercapacitors.  Looking for forward to more articles on them.

Reply

m.pivoda

7 Comments

  • 844 Days Ago
  • 10/24/2009

Passengers as an extra source of energy in buses?

Commentators above have not invented anything new. Read the historical text below:

On Tuesday 3rd November 1902 the President of the Bank of America, Albert Mann, was on his way to discuss a business deal with Thomas Edison. The appointment had been difficult to arrange in amongst the almost constant stream of guests to Edison’s New Jersey house.

As he approached the house, he saw the previous guest having real difficult opening the gate to leave. After passing pleasantries with the guest, Mann himself struggled to push open the gate before going inside to meet Edison.

As they sat down to talk, Mann said to Edison, “Before we start I have to ask why a man of your engineering genius can’t even fix his own gate?”.

“Oh but I have fixed the gate” Edison replied, “I’ve fixed it to the water pump, so that my very generous guests draw the water for the house.”

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Claros Diagnostics

IBM

ARM Holdings

Ushahidi

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement