Cell structure: This scanning-electron-microscope image shows the microstructure of a solid-oxide fuel cell. A section of the anode, which is made of a new material, is visible at right. At left, part of the cathode is visible. The smooth area in the middle is the electrolyte.
Meilin Liu

Energy

Material to Chill "Dirty" Fuel Cells

A new anode allows solid-oxide fuel cells to function at lower temperatures.

  • Thursday, October 1, 2009
  • By Katherine Bourzac

The most efficient way to get electricity from hydrocarbon fuels such as natural gas or gasified coal is to oxidize them in a solid-oxide fuel cell. Unlike other fuel cells, solid-oxide cells can run on almost any fuel. But running them efficiently requires high temperatures, which raises prices. Now researchers at Georgia Tech have developed an anode material that resists the buildup of sulfur and carbon that can occur at lower temperatures. With further development, the material might be incorporated into cheaper solid-oxide fuel cells that run efficiently at lower temperatures.

Solid-oxide fuel cells generate an electrical current by pulling oxygen from the air and using it to oxidize fuel at temperatures up to about 1,000 °C. Oxygen comes in through the cathode, fuel enters through the anode, and the two react in the electrolyte to make water and carbon dioxide, which flow out of the cell as waste. Electrons freed during the reaction are pulled into an external circuit. Solid-oxide fuel cells are currently used for stationary applications such as powering building furnaces. They might also be used in power plants to generate electricity from gasified coal, an application the U.S. Department of Energy is pursuing though its Office of Fossil Energy.

The chemical reactions in solid-oxide cells are sped by a catalyst, usually nickel, in the anode. Nickel is cheaper than the platinum catalysts used in other fuel cells, and this cost savings is one of the advantages of solid-oxide fuel cells. But nickel is prone to contamination by sulfur in the fuel, and it can get covered in carbon residue, particularly at low temperatures. Both of these factors tend to clog the cell and reduce performance.

The new anode material, described today in the journal Science, resists sulfur poisoning and carbon coking, even when running at low temperatures, and without compromising performance. Developed by researchers led by Meilin Liu, professor of materials science and engineering and codirector of the Center for Innovative Fuel Cell and Battery Technologies at Georgia Tech, the material has so far been tested over a period of 1,000 hours at temperatures ranging from 500 °C to 700 °C.

Advertisement

Solid-oxide fuel cells on the market today operate at temperatures ranging from about 800 °C to 1,000 °C. In order for them to be more widely adopted, they need to run at lower temperatures, says J. Robert Selman, professor of chemical engineering at Illinois Institute of Technology. High operating temperatures mean using expensive materials to connect the fuel cells in a stack. "If you can run at lower temperatures, you have a greater choice of structural materials to work with," says Selman. It's cheaper to connect fuel cells in a stack using metal rather than ceramics, but metal interconnects lose their structural integrity at higher temperatures.

Print

Related Articles

China's Rare-Earth Monopoly

The rest of the world is trying to find alternatives to these crucial materials.

Longer-Running Electric-Car Batteries

Silicon-nanotube electrodes may enable lithium-ion batteries to store 10 times more charge.

A Liquid Design for Cheaper Fuel Cells

A platinum-free liquid cathode could cut fuel-cell costs by 40 percent.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

JAW

1 Comment

  • 866 Days Ago
  • 10/01/2009

Why large scale?

I'm curious why it is important to achieve large scale? Are the economies that great? Aren't there many potential small scale uses for SOFC?

Reply

yijijuechen

1 Comment

  • 865 Days Ago
  • 10/02/2009

Re: Why large scale?

As for the mobile application, polymer based fuel cell is better since it can start quickly. But SOFC holds several advantages over PEMFC when natural gas can be directly used

Reply

Siphon

152 Comments

  • 858 Days Ago
  • 10/09/2009

Re: Why large scale?

You mean related to reforming?

SOFC probably has to have a strong focus on distributed generation:

- For consumer electronics (miliWatts to Watts) it's a bit impractical with that high operating temperature, even at 500 degrees.

- For mobile applications (kiloWatts), the high operating temperature and heavy shaking/vibrations of moving vehicles are serious issues for durability and practical low cost design.

- For centralized generation (tens to hundreds of MegaWatts), it has to compete with advanced combined cycles which are about as efficient and clean but probably cheaper for a long time to come.

But, for decentralized generation, it's great with it's modularity (hundreds of Watts to kiloWatts all at high fuel efficiency) and few moving parts (only the compressor/fuel pumps?)

They could start with the off grid diesel generator market. Diesel delivered to remote areas is expensive so fuel efficiency really counts. Probably the best $$$ market right now.

Reply

Keith Tomilson

9 Comments

  • 866 Days Ago
  • 10/01/2009

Fuel Cell Development

This is great news and it will be wonderful if they can pull it off .
I would dearly love to see a fuel cell that runs on coal gas .
It is everywhere in China and is carried in bottles that are the same as propane .
Advantages , low cost , clean burning , lots of coal , definitely would be a good substitute for oil .
Hydrogen fuel cells on the other hand are a non starter in my opinion and are just a waste of good research money .

Reply

JimHorwitz

2 Comments

  • 866 Days Ago
  • 10/01/2009

SOFC

Solid oxide fuel cells represent a terrific, incredibly versatile technology - local to MIT Lilliputian is working on (about to release?)a matchbook size SOFC around 100 watts (and 700C), also Boston area Acumentrics has a 2-3 kW for home combined power and heat, and a U. of Michigan spinoff has an Army trial of 180 watts working.  GE and Siemens have failed at coming up with big 1000C MW scale SOFCs for the DOE's clean coal project, but the little guys are doing well.  Europe likes SOFC - Ceres in the UK has a 500C 1 kW, but they need hydrogen when the temp is under about 600C, they're no longer self-reforming.  And coal is nasty, mining it and gassifying it; its going to take many years and many billions to get right.  And it will still be around waiting!

Reply

Pat495

16 Comments

  • 865 Days Ago
  • 10/02/2009

SOFC

I read about Dairy Farmers in California that are ready to produce and sell back to the grid $100,000 of electricity each month.  They are having problem with the EPA because of Nitrogen Oxidides,which are harmful.  It seems to me that with SOFCs there would be no NO produced. It would be very nice to see that much renewable energy put to use.

Reply

erbium

340 Comments

  • 863 Days Ago
  • 10/04/2009

no Nitrous Oxides

why do you assume there are no nitrous oxides produced?

fuel cells generally use air as a reactant.
air contains 70% nitrogen, which tends to cause nitrogen compounds

Reply

Siphon

152 Comments

  • 858 Days Ago
  • 10/09/2009

Re: no Nitrous Oxides

Because nitrogen only significantly reacts with oxygen at very high temperatures. It would be extremely low at 500 degrees operating temp.

Also, new end of pipe catalysts have been developed by Argonne that are cheap and very effective at removing NOx emissions from the flue gasses of any powerplant, as well as from diesel engines in cars and trucks.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Lattice Power

Crowdcast

Life Technologies

Siemens

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement