Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

GE Grabs Gearless Wind Turbines

New direct-drive turbines promise to lower the cost of offshore wind energy.

By Prachi Patel

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

With a new purchase, GE is betting on an early-stage turbine technology that could make offshore wind farms cheaper to maintain. The acquisition of ScanWind, based in Trondheim, Norway, has also secured GE a foothold in the growing offshore wind energy market.

One speed: ScanWind has been testing gearless 3.5-megawatt wind turbines on the Norwegian coast since 2003.
Credit: GE

Instead of gearboxes, ScanWind uses a novel direct-drive generator technology in its 3.5-megawatt turbines. This makes the turbines more reliable, the company says, by cutting downtime and repair costs--an especially important consideration for turbines offshore, where it's more expensive to send technicians for maintenance. ScanWind has been testing the turbines on the Norwegian coast since 2003.

GE, based in Fairfield, CT, is the world's second-largest maker of wind turbines, with more than 12,000 turbines installed globally. But GE's offshore wind energy portfolio has been minimal so far, and the company wants to expand its offshore offerings. By acquiring ScanWind, transferring its expertise and understanding of onshore wind, and adding technologies such as remote monitoring and sensing, GE hopes it can make a solid, cost-effective offshore wind product.

In conventional wind turbines, the blades spin a shaft that is connected through a gearbox to the generator. The gearbox converts the turning speed of the blades--15 to 20 rotations per minute for a large, one-megawatt turbine--into the faster 1,800 rotations per minute that the generator needs to generate electricity. "Wind turbines are very different than any other gearbox application," says Sandy Butterfield, chief engineer of the wind program at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, CO. "You're going from a very low speed to a high speed." Typically it's the opposite.

The multiple wheels and bearings in a wind turbine gearbox suffer tremendous stress because of wind turbulence, and a small defect in any one component can bring the turbine to a halt. This makes the gearbox the most high-maintenance part of a turbine. Gearboxes in offshore turbines, which face higher wind speeds, are even more vulnerable than those in onshore turbines. Butterfield is leading a gearbox-reliability study with turbine makers to identify design weaknesses that could be avoided.

ScanWind's turbine design gets rid of the gearbox completely. Instead, the rotor shaft is attached directly to the generator, which spins at the same speed as the blades.

In a turbine generator, magnets spin around a coil to produce current--the faster the magnets spin, the more current is induced in the coil. To make up for a direct drive generator's slower spinning rate, the radius of rotation is increased, effectively increasing the speed with which the magnets move around the coil.

Comments

  • current? torque?
    "In a turbine generator, magnets spin around a coil to produce current--the faster the magnets spin, the more current is induced in the coil. To make up for a direct-drive generator's slower spinning speed, the magnets in ScanWind's turbine circle with a larger diameter, boosting the amount of current that is induced in the generator by increasing the torque."
    I think the following is a better explanation:
    By Faraday's law, a magnet moving past a coil generates an electric field, i.e. a voltage. The voltage is directly proportional to the magnet's speed. Increasing the radius of rotation increases the speed proportionally (for the same rotation rate), and thus the voltage.
    Current is directly proportional to voltage and load (Ohm's law).
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ms
    09/23/2009
    Posts:129
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: current? torque?
      @ms
      Thanks for the suggestion. That sentence has been fixed to make it a bit clearer.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      willknight
      09/29/2009
      Posts:15
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • Wind Turbines
    I would assume that if the rotor was larger it would also have more coils?  But how much larger would the rotor have to be to get the same electrical energy as the gear box versions. 

    Also whatever happened to the vertical wind generators, they looked like a simpler concept to me, I have seen articles on prototypes but not much follow up?

    Dave
    Rate this comment: 12345

    dmillerfla
    09/28/2009
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Wind Turbines
      The vertical wind turbines have so far had far lower efficiencies than the large tree bladed turbine designs that are the most common today.

      The dramatic reduction in efficiency is a much bigger economical disadvantage than the advantage in very slightly lower maintenance cost by having the generator at ground level, and eliminating the minor cost of the yaw mechanism...

      What's needed is an efficient design.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Siphon
      10/09/2009
      Posts:145
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • Cost of direct drives
    It looks like a major reason for the high cost of direct drives is the low volume at which these things are currently (no pun intended) produced.

    They should actually cost about the same as gearboxes for the same volume production. Technical advancements that reduce the weight of the drive can help further reduce the cost (it has to do with greater mechanical stresses in the drive and generator equipment right?).
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Siphon
    10/09/2009
    Posts:145
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Wind turbine
    Has anyone thought of fluid drives for the turbines? They could still mount the units high to gain more wind speed but have a fluid drive down to the ground level generators with a risistance built-in the line to obtain more pressure to the generator? Just a thought!
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Wheeliebin10...
    10/10/2009
    Posts:1
  • Excitation Field
    Simplicity whenever possible and gearless is very desirable. Seems to me that either design requires power line conditioning? Frequency, lead, and lag adjustments are done electronically for any grid connected wind machine?

    A really puzzling question for me is: Can not the speed of the turbine be controlled by the load on the generator? (i.e. controlling the excitation field) Can permanent magnet generators have controllable excitation fields?

    Why do GE designs have a cutout speed at high wind conditions? Why not feather the blade pitch and balance against the generator loading? What is the limiting design feature that requires parking during high wind conditions?

    Thanks for any insights.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    thollister
    11/18/2009
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Making 3D Maps on the Move
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.