The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Composting biofuels: Inside this white building, piles of sorghum are broken down into acids. The tanks in the foreground are used for pretreatment and for delivering a mixed culture containing many different organisms that break down biomass. The acids they produce can be used to make gasoline and other chemicals.
Terrabon
A process that converts acids from garbage into fuel gets a boost.
A company that has developed a process for converting organic waste and other biomass into gasoline--Terrabon, based in Houston--recently announced a partnership with Waste Management, the giant garbage-collection and -disposal company based in Houston. The partnership could help Terrabon bring its technology to market.
Amid a profusion of new biofuels technologies, this one stands out because it will be relatively easy to scale up for producing millions of gallons of fuel, says James McMillan, the biochemical process R&D group manager at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, CO, who is not connected to the company.
Most biofuels companies fall into one of two categories. Some use enzymes to break down biomass into simple sugars and a single organism to convert sugars into fuel, such as yeast. Others use high temperatures and pressure to break biomass down into basic chemical building blocks--carbon monoxide and hydrogen--which are then chemically processed into fuels. Terrabon has developed a process that combines the two. It uses a naturally occurring mixture of organisms to convert biomass, not into fuels, but into carboxylic acids. These can be converted into fuel and other chemicals using well-known chemical processes. Gary Luce, the company's CEO, says Terrabon's fuels can compete with petroleum-based fuels if prices are above $75 a barrel. (The price of oil is currently about $70 a barrel.)
The approach has an advantage over single-organism-based methods because the mixture of organisms used, collected from salt marshes, are adapted to survive in the wild. They don't require the special sterile environments needed to prevent single-organism cultures from being contaminated, which brings down the cost of equipment.
These organisms naturally break down biomass into carboxylic acids, such as acetic acid, the key component of vinegar. These acids can serve as chemical precursors for a wide variety of chemicals and fuels, including gasoline and diesel, via processing steps that convert the acids into ketones and alcohols. The acids can be made without the expensive equipment required for high-pressure and -temperature processes. They can also then be processed into fuels using equipment at existing refineries, helping keep costs down.
Because the organisms don't require special treatment and because the acids they produce can be converted to fuels at existing refineries, it should be relatively easy to ramp up production, McMillan says. Terrabon's partnership with Waste Management should help, he says, since one of the biggest challenges with advanced biofuels is collecting the large amounts of biomass needed. Waste Management already has trucks and other equipment for collecting garbage and separating the organic waste.
Where I live, the green waste from our landfills is turned into compost and sold back to residents of my city for a profit. I think a lot of the "so called "green waste" already has a lot of intrinsic value within the gardening and farming communities. Therefore calling it waste is a misnomer as it has value.
I tend to agree with your assertion that what is sometimes called 'waste' is really not. Nature has endow man with so much that I tend to believe that man is simply just about scratching the surface. Who will think of 'green waste' ever beeen considered for recycle decades ago. Interesting thought.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
flared0ne
395 Comments
Sounds like there are still quite a few unknowns
re all the balancing elements in the 'profit/loss' spreadsheet. Particularly in analyzing raw feedstock handling and processing costs (since the majority of it can't be slurried and pumped).
In addition, the inability to predict results of genegineering biological processor elements doesn't look good ("we're not quite sure how it works"), but that may be all for the best given the associated possibility of some highly-evolved composting-processor escaping to become the first "grey goo" civilization-killer...
That said, this probably DOES make a certain amount of sense in the described context of an existing reclamation/disposal facility with essentially in-place access to significant amounts of biomass which still have to be processed SOMEhow. May as well recycle it and make a buck -- as long as the spreadsheet indicates it wouldn't be more efficient to simply burn it and distribute electrical power instead...
Reply