Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

A Liquid Design for Cheaper Fuel Cells

A platinum-free liquid cathode could cut fuel-cell costs by 40 percent.

By Prachi Patel

Thursday, September 03, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Platinum remains the best material for speeding chemical reactions in hydrogen fuel cells, although the scarcity and cost of this element keep fuel cells from becoming more affordable and practical. Most alternative approaches involve simply replacing the platinum in the electrodes. Now a U.K. company called ACAL Energy has overhauled fuel cell design to reduce the amount of platinum used by 80 percent.

Liquid design: Inside ACAL Energy’s fuel-cell stacks, the cathode is replaced with a platinum-free catalyst solution, which could reduce costs by 40 percent.
Credit: ACAL Energy

In a conventional fuel cell, platinum is embedded in porous carbon electrodes. ACAL's design replaces this with a solution containing low-cost molybdenum and vanadium as the catalyst. The resulting fuel cell works as well as a conventional one but should cost 40 percent less, the company says.

ACAL says its design gives power densities of 600 milliwatts per square centimeter at 0.6 volts. The benchmark value for automotive fuel cells is 900 milliwatts per square centimeter, says Hubert Gasteiger, a visiting professor of mechanical engineering at MIT. ACAL also claims that its fuel cell works unpressurized--adding pressure should increase the power density further.

The new system's power density could reach 1.5 watts per square centimeter, says Andrew Creeth, ACAL's co-founder and chief technology officer. "We believe that we're getting close to a marketable product," he says.

The company has already made a one-kilowatt system that it intends to sell to select customers next year, and the fuel cells should be available more widely in 2011. The plan is to first target the market for diesel generators with one- to 10-kW systems, then move on to larger applications such as home power generation and electric cars.

Story continues below


The platinum in a polymer membrane fuel cell--the top choice for generators and electric cars--splits hydrogen into ions and electrons at the anode, and helps these combine with oxygen at the cathode to form water. But platinum is in limited supply, costing $1,200 per ounce on average over the past three years. And the price is "likely to skyrocket if platinum became heavily used in fuel cells," adds Douglas MacFarlane, a chemistry professor at Monash University in Melbourne, Australia, who is also developing alternative fuel-cell catalysts.

Today's fuel cells use 0.5 grams of platinum for each kilowatt of power they generate, Gasteiger says, but the long-term goal is to use less than 0.2 grams of platinum for each kilowatt.

Comments

  • Great news
    fuel cells really would be a great help in reducing energy use and this seems like a step in the right direction to making them practical.

    since some fuel cells can react simple fairly pure hydrocarbons in forms like methanol this would be a quick drop-in to existing automobile infrastructure.  And the added bonus is that fuel cells are twice as efficient as internal combustion engines, so fuel usage would be halved for cars on the road.

    we likely will be making methanol or ethanol for fuel cell cars from solar powered or other renewable sources and reducing the CO2 in the atmosphere in the process.

    cars running on an electrical source, whether batteries with their limited range or fuel cells, which could get twice the range for the same amount of fuel compared to today's cars, are simpler in design which should translate to reduced operating costs.  They should also reduce leaks from oil onto roads that current cars cause, as they don't have the circulating oil like today's cars, and seals that leak.

    Rate this comment: 12345

    erbium
    09/03/2009
    Posts:136
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Just not for hydrogen please
    This is great news and I agree it could be a great fit for our existing infrastructure if it's for direct methanol or ethanol/etc fuel cells.  Please just tell me that we're not going to waste our time trying to create a new infrastructure and find ways to store hydrogen in dangerous, high pressure tanks that take up half our trunk.  The water,  electricity and other energy used to produce it as well as the energy required to compress it and put it in those high pressure tanks.  The other small problem with hydrogen is that it comes from natural gas or petroleum products.  That does not help solve anything at all.
    Everyone keeps pretending that hydrogen is some "clean" power source and ignores the fact that it is nothing but an energy carrier separated from other sources which causes a lot of pollution and other side effects to produce, store, transport and use. 

    Go with a dmfc (direct methanol fuel cell) and all of these issues go away.  Stop the hydrogen hype/lies.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    DaveD
    09/06/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Storing hydrogen in cars can be done safely
      as WATER!

      with two molecules of hydrogen for each oxygen, water is handy source of hydrogen.

      It is impractical to electrolyse it in a car as then you need the energy stored somewhere else in the car to do this.

      However, if you carry:
      1) either aluminum or magnesium pellets
      2) water
      in your car you can get 400+ miles on a fuel cell from these, let me explain:

      either metal can produce hydrogen on demand.
      aluminum reacts violently with water at ROOM TEMPERATURE till all the water is gone, giving off hydrogen.  The catch:  a small amount of gallium must be present, to keep the normal action of aluminum to form a protective oxide skin from happening (the same reason why aluminum, unlike iron, doesn't rust).

      Magnesium similarly reacts with water, albeit at temperature similar to today's car engines.

      In either case, fueling stations, not unlike today's gas stations would either truck in unoxidized metal pellets, or re-process them by applying electricity generated locally, from any source, but ideally from renewable forms like solar thermal modules.

      And instead of complaining about carrying hydrogen in your car being unsafe (it really is safer than today's gasoline as it quickly goes up into the air unlike gasoline which pools along the ground waiting for a spark), you'd have 25 gallons of water instead of gasoline or hydrogen in your tank.

      the process to turn aluminum oxide that the cars will produce into aluminum, goes on daily and while taking alot of electricity, is as efficient as we can make it today as this is the basis for the aluminum industry.  Aluminum is also one of the most abundant elements in the earth's crust.

      Of course you don't just mix the two together.  You feed the two ingredients to a small device that would produce hydrogen on demand, at the same speed as the car uses it, with a small reserve for increase usage such as acceleration.

      magnesium:
      http://www.techbriefs.com/component/content/article/3498

      aluminum:
      http://www.physorg.com/news98556080.html

      http://www.fuelcellsworks.com/Supppage7355.html

      Rate this comment: 12345

      erbium
      09/07/2009
      Posts:136
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • Cheaper Fuel Cells
    The problem with the Aluminum Magnesium is that it requires about 5 times the energy received to remove the Oxygen from the particles.  If in fact this fuel cell were to burn Methanol or Ethanol there would be no worries about storage, plenty of energy would fit in a tank.  I, for one am excited about a hydrogen economy in the future.  I would like to know more about that catalyst the Germans found that converts Methane to Methanol, anyone have any links there?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Pat495
    09/07/2009
    Posts:15
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Cheaper Fuel Cells
      It's hard to get excited about hydrogen without any way of getting it save fossil fuel processes.  The overall efficiency of these processes is lower than just burning gasoline and much lower that battery power.

      The last administration decided to spend money on this on behalf of the oil and coal industry.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      TooMany
      09/12/2009
      Posts:58
      Avg Rating:
      4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.