The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Going supercritical: This laboratory equipment is being used to study supercritical diesel fuel.
George Anitescu, Syracuse University
A supercritical diesel engine could increase efficiency and cut emissions.
Researchers in New York have demonstrated a supercritical diesel fuel-injection system that can reduce engine emissions by 80 percent and increase overall efficiency by 10 percent.
Diesel engines tend to be more efficient than gasoline, but the trade-off is that they are usually more polluting. Because diesel is heavy, viscose, and less volatile than gasoline, not all the fuel is burned during combustion, resulting in carbon compounds being released as harmful particulate soot. The higher combustion temperatures required to burn diesel also lead to increased nitrogen oxides emissions.
A fluid becomes supercritical when its temperature and pressure exceed a critical boundary point, causing it to take on novel properties between those of a liquid and a gas. George Anitescu, a research associate at the Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering at Syracuse University in New York state, who developed the new engine design, says that supercritical diesel can be burned more efficiently and cleanly.
By raising diesel to a supercritical state before injecting it into an engine's combustion chamber, viscosity becomes less of a problem, says Anitescu. Additionally, the high molecular diffusion of supercritical fluids means that the fuel and air mix together almost instantaneously. So instead of trying to burn relatively large droplets of fuel surrounded by air, the vaporized fuel mixes more evenly with air, which makes it burn more quickly, cleanly, and completely. In a sense, it is like an intermediate between diesel and gasoline, but with the benefits of both, says Anitescu, who presented his work last week at Directions in Engine-Efficiency and Emissions Research, a conference held in Dearborn, MI.
In the past, another related approach, called homogeneous charge compression ignition, has been used to improve the performance of diesel. This involves premixing diesel and air before injecting it as a vapour into a combustion chamber under high pressure. But while this mixture burns more efficiently, it also makes combustion more difficult to control, which can lead to engine knocking: shockwaves within the engine's cylinders caused by pockets of unburned fuel and air. In contrast, supercritical diesel injection produces very small vapour-like droplets, but with fuel densities equivalent to a liquid, says Anitescu.
Andreas Birgel, a researcher with the Internal Combustion Engines and Fuel Systems Research Group at University College London, UK, says there is plenty of interest in producing diesel that vaporizes more easily, for example, by using corn or rapeseed oil to make biodiesel, which has a relatively low viscosity. Another approach is to treat conventional diesel with additives, he says.
Cool stuff, I am always for people who use pre-existing components in new designs, in this case using existing fuel injectors. This makes the adoption of new system much easier. Even if they get the system to increase fuel efficiency by 5 to 10 mph, that is a great improvement and would render the system commercially attractive.
Dr. Brian Glassman
Ph.D in Innovation Management from Purdue University
Point of use inputs, whether as above commented, or even as supplemental hydrogen, have those advantages. Actually certain fairly cheap additives can be used, even co-injected, with particular good effect in higher-compression engines such as Diesel. Excellent test results have been achieved in efficiency and emissions using non-exotic additive blends, intended for mass distribution, depots, but not consumer individual action. The actual problems seem more to be in gaining 'establishment' acceptance, particularly where it is invested in the status quo and current 'solutions'. Air quality is much better, but less platinum might be needed, etc.
N.Evans
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
kitk
76 Comments
Fuel vaporization
Call it super critical fuel, it is still fuel vaporization, give or take a technial detail. This has been around a long time, and held loads of promise, but was always dangerous or too difficult.
Yet, I have seen cars on boiled gas get mileage two or three times anything normally seen on the road today. Yeah, it works.
I really, REALLY hope this can be made to work. But, there are simpler, and safer ways to do it besides pumping in heat. Some humidifiers vaporize water through sound waves. And microwaves, or some other spectrum, might be able to flash the fuel as it exits nozzels into the cylander. This could allow the rest of the fuel to be normal liquid, and only a minute amount super critical at a given time. Further, if the engine stops for any reason, so would the vaporization, safely.
It only require a measured radiation in just the right place, to do the job.
Someone, please pass it on!
Reply
rrcoscia
1 Comment
Re: Fuel vaporization
Yes, I read about an ultrasonic nebulizing carburator several years ago. An ultrasonic nebulizer can produce droblets at about 1.5 microns. (I think the nebulizer can be tuned to optimize the sizes.) Supposedly, the nebulizing carburator could get 30 miles/gallon from cars that were getting 10-12 mpg. I'm not sure how the technology would work with an injector, but the carburator basically put a nebulizing surface in the throat of the carburetor and when gasoline hit it it would instantly become extremely small droplets.
Of interest in this article is that the high pressure apparently breaks the bonds of the hydrocarbons and changes the chemical structure. (The nebulizer isn't able to do that.) The benefit generally is that the smaller the hydrocarbon, the better the burn (methane CH4, the simplest hydrocarbon, burns completely to CO2 & water.) So the nebulizer and pressure work differently but both are very intriguing.
Reply