Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Less May Be More for Wind Turbines

Nordic Windpower's two-bladed rotors depart from conventional wind-power design.

By Peter Fairley

Monday, August 03, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

One of the first R&D grants to a renewable-energy developer from the economic-stimulus funds approved by Congress this spring could have a dramatic impact on the design of wind turbines. The $16 million loan guarantee offered by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to Berkeley, CA-based Nordic Windpower will accelerate commercialization of the company's Swedish-designed, two-bladed wind turbines, marking the first utility-scale alternative to the industry's dominant three-bladed design in over a decade.

Less to lift: Nordic Windpower’s N1000 wind turbines use two blades to generate up to 1 megawatts of power, making them cheaper to build than a conventional three-bladed machine.
Credit: Nordic Windpower

In recent years, wind-energy entrepreneurs have already been pushing beyond the standard design. Blue H Technologies of the Netherlands and Norway's SWAY, for example, are testing unorthodox turbine designs tailored for placement on offshore platforms anchored in deep water far offshore. Blue H is testing two-bladed turbines akin to Nordic's, while SWAY has a three-bladed design that faces the rotor downwind, bucking the industry's conventional into-the-wind orientation.

The attraction for all three companies to pursue innovative approaches is essentially the same: their designs could be substantially lighter than today's turbines, and could thus produce energy at much lower cost. That remains an important goal for wind power, which, though presently the cheapest form of renewable-power generation, remains dependent on government incentives.

What sets Nordic apart from others rethinking wind-turbine architecture is that its prototypes have been operating successfully for over a decade. Backed by Goldman Sachs since 2007 and now by the DOE, the company plans to begin shipping commercial models later this year. Nordic's experience should help overcome skepticism that such alternative designs can be robust in megawatt-scale machines--skepticism that was reinforced by earlier, failed experiments with two-bladed and downwind turbines.

Story continues below


Nordic Windpower CEO Tom Carbone, who formerly led the U.S. operations of Danish wind-turbine giant Vestas, says that Nordic's key technology is the "teetered hub" that the two blades use. Nordic's hub provides a flexible link between the rotor and the generator driveshaft, enabling the blades to move in and out of the plane of rotation in response to gusts or turbulence. Carbone says Nordic's lightweight design can deliver a whopping 20-25 percent cost reduction relative to three-bladed turbines.

Bumpers constrain the hinging to just two degrees in either direction, but that is enough to shed unwanted forces that would otherwise strain the turbine's gearbox. Shedding unwanted forces also means that the entire structure, from tower to generator to blades, can be built lighter and cheaper. "You're reducing the amount of material normally used to strengthen the structure against those loads," says Carbone.

Comments

  • Two bladed tech is not new.
    "Swedish Technology" - This seems crazy?  Carter Wind Energy (CWE) - has developed one of the most material efficient and simple two bladed downwind teetering turbine systems and has been around for decades.  Why DOE would want to guarantee loans (using taxpayer money) for another imported tech - that looks like an upwind two-bladed design with the same problems of the Danish three bladed designs and the same massive hub - leaves me almost speechless.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Grinch01
    08/03/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Two bladed tech is not new.
      My guess looking at both websites is that Nordic already has 1+ MW turbines of this design and Carter does not.  I suspect there is more to it than that and I have no doubt Carter is trying to get a piece of that tax payer pie as well.  As to the tech not being from the US.. who cares.. Really what is the problem with a US company licensing some tech from Europe and making a good product. It is a US company making the product here why shouldn't they. Are you going to suggest we should boycot all vehicles with diesel engines because it was not invented here?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Gurthang
      08/03/2009
      Posts:23
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • Commercial Development
    The wind turbine design that may warrant such funding is the high efficiency, low profile design that was in development by TMA Global Wind Turbine Systems / TMA Inc. This promised greater application worldwide and superior performance than two or three blade horizontal-axis wind turbines!  Please tell me when we can purchase them?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Stroudy
    08/03/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
  • wind power
    ... and why is there no collaboration with  http://whalepower.com or others?. It seems to me all these evolutionary steps are never combined to produce the ultimate system where everybody wins.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    flyingmonste...
    08/03/2009
    Posts:11
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: wind power
      good point about combining.  it seems that is the case for any number of novel technologies.  there should be some office to promote collaboration in engineering to market complementary new energy technologies.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      chir0pter
      08/04/2009
      Posts:12
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • error on page one of article
    The article says the turbine puts out 1000 megawatts. I for one would love to see a gigawatt turbine. :D

    The actual figure is 1000 kW, one megawatt.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    coloradoengi...
    08/03/2009
    Posts:10
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Nordic Windpower owns the Technology
    Hello all - I just wanted to clarify a few points that were made in the commentary - Nordic Windpower owns the technology, they acquired it in 2007 from the Norwegian/Swedish entity that owned it.  They have invested heavily in updating the technology, materials and controls.  They are making the "Volvo of Wind Turbines" even safer and more reliable then before for community and distributed wind applications.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    tippy2
    08/04/2009
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • Response to Grinch01 - New is not always better...this is better
    The technology is proven over many years of operations in the harsh climates of Sweden, and virtually maintenance free, because of the patented teeter-hub that enables a flexible, lighter, simpler two-bladed design that few have been able to achieve.  The flexible technology protects the drive train and gear box, and dissipates turbulent winds harmlessly, increasing reliability and lowering maintenance.   According to the DOE release, Nordic will be creating at least 75 jobs right here in the USA within the next year.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    tippy2
    08/06/2009
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • NOISE
    The problem with all these down wind turbines is tower "pop" (BOOM!) noise.
    I know, I owned a Carter 350 and it produced a lot of power and a lot of noise. The tower pop could be clearly heard down wind 4 miles away and on a bad day 6 miles away.
    One time this produced a resonance of the air in  our house and oh sh1t was it sickening till I could get on line and shut it down!
    In the end somebody "felled it", due I'm told to the noise. By that time I had sold it back to the UK company.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    hillsider69
    11/22/2009
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.