Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

The Big Smart Grid Challenges

Regulations, privacy and security concerns, and other issues could hold back developments.

By Kevin Bullis

Friday, July 17, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

A smarter electricity grid could fundamentally change the way people pay for and manage their electricity use. In theory, the technology could help reduce demand, save money, and improve reliability and efficiency. But implementing the necessary changes will be difficult, according to experts attending a symposium on the smart grid at GE Global Research in Niskayuna, NY, this week. They expect resistance from regulators and consumers alike, citing the complexity of the proposed system as well as concerns about privacy and security.

Smarter meter: Possible strategies for reducing energy consumption rely on devices that can send and receive information from utilities and communicate wirelessly with appliances.
Credit: Kevin Bullis, Technology Review
Multimedia
video  See how the smart grid works.

The smart grid will incorporate new networking technology, including sensors and controls that make it possible to monitor electricity use in real time and make automatic changes that reduce energy waste. Furthermore, grid operators should be able to instantly detect problems that could lead to cascading outages, like the ones that cut power to the northeastern United States in 2003. And the technology ought to allow energy companies to incorporate more intermittent, renewable sources of electricity, such as wind turbines, by keeping the grid stable in the face of minute-by-minute changes in output.

For consumers, the smart grid could also mean radical changes in the way they pay for electricity. Instead of a flat rate, they could be charged much more at times of high demand, encouraging them to reduce their energy use during these periods. Companies such as GE are developing refrigerators, dryers, and other appliances that can automatically respond to signals from the utility, shutting off or reducing energy consumption to allow consumers to avoid paying the peak prices. Such strategies could allow utilities to put off building new transmission lines and generators to meet peak demand--savings that could be important as proposed regulations on carbon dioxide emissions force them to switch to more expensive sources of electricity.

Story continues below


But the necessary changes could prove difficult for consumers to adjust to, says Garry Brown, chairman of the New York State Public Service Commission, a utility regulator. Industrial and commercial electricity customers already have variable electricity rates that change with the time of day, but "they have the ability and expertise and wherewithal to figure out what to do with this," Brown says. "They have a manager that spends their life trying to react to it." Ordinary consumers don't have that advantage. Indeed, in the 1990s the New York state legislature blocked mandatory variable pricing amid concerns about the impact it could have on customers who couldn't avoid peak prices, such as people who must use electric-powered medical equipment around the clock. We have to be "slow and cautious," about introducing the technology, Brown says.

The grid upgrade may also face resistance from regulators because some of the benefits are difficult to measure. Regulators are responsible for ensuring that utilities make wise investments that restrain the price of electricity. But improved efficiency and reliability can't easily be quantified, says Bryan Olnick, a senior director at the major utility Florida Power and Light. He says that regulators need to start considering long-term societal benefits in addition to electricity costs. Ultimately, regulators will need proof that the systems can deliver the promised benefits, which is why there are now smart-grid demonstration projects in places including Boulder, CO; Maui; and Miami.

Comments

  • a social smart grid
    the problem with the way the smart grid is currently being sold is the same way electricity is sold - handed down from high by these monolithic companies. We know from many other topologies that have rolled out that you need to build communities before you have any software success. It's all about opt-in and user control. In our opinion, it not only is going to be open standards, but it's going to be open-source that defines the successful smart grid.  I want an API that I can write to, with transparent code I can change if I want to, to design "energy schemes" that I can share with a community.  Think facebook meets the grid - security, trust, reliability is not going to come from general electric dropping some nifty but closed-source devices in their GE ovens, it's going to come from a group of participating technologists who have a trust between themselves. People are going to download their power maven friend's energy scheme because they trust that person more than some big company who's trying to essentially up the bill or at least their margin one way or another. Plus, this smart-grid technology is all over the place already, it's not rocket science. there is very robust home automation software now - it's just a matter of time before a leading FOSS framework takes root. plus, making your own electricity with PV is already happening in a giant way, so it's not just the software that's going to fragment - it's actual power.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jwgorman
    07/17/2009
    Posts:15
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: a social smart grid
      Hello jwgorman,

      You are right. There is a need to change the Investor Owned Utilities Architecture Framework (IOUs-AF) that served us very well before 1970, but that became obsolete and increasly costly after that time. An architecture flaw introduced in the Energy Policy Act of 1992, has made necessary a series of incremental extensions on the IOUs-AF, to extend its useful life while generating a huge legacy. The Smart Grid is the latest incremental extension, in which the business model of IOUs winning cases to the regulator is kept, will lead to a billion of dollars value destruction on early obsolescence to the general public.

      The Electricity Without Price Control (EWPC) Architecture Framework (EWPC-AF) has emerged to replace the IOUs-AF, introducing business model competition to several market segments. To see an introductory example of EWPC-AF, please take a look at the most recent article How Secretary Chu can Deliver a Win-Win, Big Deal Outcome at the Global Sustainability Game, which has 10 references and so far 11 comments.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      javs
      07/17/2009
      Posts:95
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      • Re: a social smart grid
        you are soooo right.. let's have another synposium to discuss smart-grids and perhaps micro-grids, etc.?!!

        Amare'
        Phoenix Communities, Inc
        amare@phoenixcommunities.org
        347-365-8585
        Rate this comment: 12345

        sanamare
        07/20/2009
        Posts:1
        Avg Rating:
        1/5
        • Strong & Smart Grid
          Thank you sanamare,

          There is actually no need for more debate. There is a need for a Strong & Smart Grid. This is a comment I submitted under the article "Smart Grid or Strong Grid? Comment on Ken Maize," by Robert Michaels, posted on July 8, 2009, in MasterResource: A free-market energy blog:


          I love the concept of the Strong Grid, as it fits nicely with the Electricity Without Price Controls (EWPC) Architecture Framework (EWPC-AF) that has emerged to replace the Investor Owned Utilities (IOUs) Architecture Framework (IOUs-AF).

          This is how it fits. The Smart Grid is based on the policy: economy first, system performance second. The strong Grid is based on system performance first, economy second.

          A Strong Grid will result in a simple, not simplistic, power industry, which can be divided into two highly cohesive systems that are lightly coupled and that mutually reinforce each other. The systems are a primary regulated power service transportation system and a secondary open market commercialization business system. That is my key discovery.

          Please go to the EWPC Blog (my website) to learn about the Greek Tragedy that will cost the American ratepayers and/or taxpayers billions of dollars.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          javs
          07/20/2009
          Posts:95
          Avg Rating:
          5/5
  • OSS projects
    Well, there's time to complain and there's time to build. But things are changing. some projects I think are interesting from a open-source / community side:

    international residential renewable PPA:

    http://www.solarnetwork.net/

    open-source EV:

    http://tumanako.net/

    group discounts on solar systems:

    http://1bog.org/

    Home Automation Network:

    http://osgug.ucaiug.org/utilityami/openhan/default.aspx

    all pretty cool stuff...
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jwgorman
    07/18/2009
    Posts:15
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: OSS projects
      Hi again jwgorman,

      I just had the insight that it is actually DOE that is calling the shots. Are those projects better off with a government imposed dead-end inflexible architecture, just to extend the useful life of the IOUs-AF, or with a valuable and flexible global competitive architecture, such as the EWPC-AF that follows Silicon Valley life cycle?

      With the above insight in mind, please take a look also to the EWPC article The Deadly Sin of State Regulators on the Smart Grid (please hit the hyperlink on the left) to get a better idea of the dead-end.

      Do you know what opportunities do your projects face under that reality?

      Good luck!
      Rate this comment: 12345

      javs
      07/18/2009
      Posts:95
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
  • What is Missing
    What most analysts and commentators are missing is that the Smart Grid discussion is focused entirely on the Electric Utilities monitoring/reporting, managing and controlling power use TO the consumer/companies.
    What is not being discussed is what is being made available to the home Owner to Monitor/Control and Manage their individual devices in the home. Key here is providing both In Home and Remote Access too, Programming of and control of individual devices. This to not only include the electric power devices(ThermoStats/Lighting/Appliances) but also other Home Automation Systems (Water Meters/Video Surveillance/Security and Entry Systems). All these require some form of management and the consumer needs to control each.
    This is being addressed nicely today.
    People need to look at what a small firm called In2Networks is doing with their Internet Communication Modulse (ICM'S). They address all the mentioned HA devices and allow remote monitoring/reporting/alerts and controls of each.

    Jim A.
    Service provider
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jacomo
    07/24/2009
    Posts:3
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: What is Missing
      jacomo, you've said exactly what I wanted to, thanks. this is not some kind of system that only the electricity providers can achieve, it is completely available to the consumer. I think however, not everyone is going to be interested in setting up a system by themselves, and that's why you need service companies to provide the kind systems to do achieve it - those again can be independent entities using a variety of tools. once you throw cheap PV and PPA organizations and free and open-source software supported by an active development community into the mix, there's a lot of possibilities. those are still missing, but they're on the way I think.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      jwgorman
      07/26/2009
      Posts:15
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: What is Missing
        Yes! You are both correct that those parts of the system will be required to get the whole system working properly. I think we could call those the little smart grid challenges that can be though to be engineering technology jobs.

        However, I am writing about energy policy, the big smart grid challenges, which is what makes the system work properly as a whole. This ones can be though to be a socio-technical architecting job.

        The century old energy policy of the Investor Owned Utilities Architecture Framework has become a huge mistake dead end. To get introduced into the results of the architecting job, please take a look at the EWPC article Strong Evidence of Why Utilities as We Know Them Will Fail.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        javs
        07/28/2009
        Posts:95
        Avg Rating:
        5/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES
Smart Grids
Siemens Smart Grid Solutions, more than just smart meters

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.