Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Intel's Wireless Power Play

A research project cuts the electric cord, wirelessly charging an electronic device.

By Kate Greene

Monday, June 22, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Last Thursday, Intel researchers demonstrated 45 research projects, ranging from ray-tracing algorithms for better animation to organic photovoltaics for flexible solar cells, at the Computer History Museum, in Mountain View, CA. But the project that received the most attention by far was the demo of a wirelessly charged iPod speaker. The speaker was attached to a copper coil with a 30-centimeter diameter, and it was powered by magnetic fields produced from a second coil, with double the diameter, nearly a meter away.

Resonant rings: The speaker in the center of this coil is wirelessly powered by the magnetic field produced by another, larger coil (not pictured) plugged into a power supply about a meter away.
Credit: Kate Greene

Intel's wireless power project, first announced at the company's developer forum last August, bears a strong resemblance to a project announced by researchers at MIT in 2007, which was featured as one of the TR10 top emerging technologies of 2008. Similar to the MIT project led by Marin Soljacic and the prototypes developed by the spinoff startup WiTricity, the Intel project uses magnetic fields to transfer energy; the type of radiation shared between the two coils is nonradiative, which means that it's confined to a short distance of less than two meters.

The idea of wireless power transfer is, of course, not new. Physicist Nikola Tesla proposed it in the late 19th century. However, funding for his projects ran out at about the same time that the modern world decided to take a wired approach. And for more than a century, wires have done the job well enough. But with the advent of portable electronics that seem to need constant charging, wireless electricity is coming back in style, and researchers are exploring ways to make it practical. In addition, plug-in electric vehicles are another motivating factor, as plugging in a car (or forgetting to plug one in) is a burden that consumers may not want to bear.

The modern approach that WiTricity and Intel are taking makes use of the phenomenon called resonant coupling, in which objects can exchange energy with each other only when they are tuned to, or resonate at, the same frequency. Specifically, both groups are using magnetic fields for sharing energy because such fields have little known impact on the environment and on people's health, compared with electrical fields.

Story continues below


For the Intel project, the large coil was hooked up to electronics that produced a current oscillating at seven megahertz. The receiving coil was tuned to the same frequency, and thus is able to accept an energy transfer with about 80 percent efficiency within a range of about a meter, says Josh Smith, the lead researcher on the project. Smith notes that the project is still in its early stages, but he and his team are interested in how the technology could be incorporated into Intel products, such as laptops or other portable devices. "We're building on [what the MIT researchers] demonstrated in 2007 and extending it in different ways," he says. He adds that this team is working on a paper that will expound on the details later this year, and that Intel doesn't have a timeline for products.

Comments

  • effecient?
    My only issue with this is previous reports of wireless power were at about 50% efficacy (or something like that, if memory serves).  Why spend billions in technology to save power/resources/environment just to lose it on a wireless charge.  How many articles have we read that were ecstatic at only a 5-6% increase in solar cell efficiency, for instance... 
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Urbanstatue
    06/22/2009
    Posts:5
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: effecient?
      We want each item to be more efficient with the energy we got, but then we want to do more stuff with that extra (saved) energy.  Our goal should be to change where and how we get the energy, not to worry about how much we use.  I want to have clean abundant energy; more than enough, so that it is cheep.
      Jobs, pollution, disasters, hunger, wars and many other earthly issues can be solved with a saturation of energy.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      StupidPeasan...
      06/28/2009
      Posts:43
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • magnetic field
    "Specifically, both groups are using magnetic fields for sharing energy because such fields have little known impact on the environment and on people's health, compared with electrical fields."

    According to maxwell theory magnetic field produces electric field so where is the catch? Where this 20% of energy goes?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    b1r3k
    06/24/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Incredible invention!!
    we can have giant expensive coils that produce extraneous radiation that may make you sterile, and lose half the electricity,

    all to replace 10 cents worth of copper wire to span six feet.

    I can't think of other ways to get my electric bill past the consumer baseline so they double my rates.

    That's PROGRESS!!!!


    Rate this comment: 12345

    erbium
    06/25/2009
    Posts:136
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Incredible invention!!
      I agree it is a bad invention.
      The principle is so simple that it is almost impossible to improve its efficiency.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      gearss
      06/29/2009
      Posts:13
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • Try making miniaturized loops (100 micron loop diameter);then use them to power wet chemistry chips with microwaves
    I note that 7 Mh waves (lambda = 42.8 m.)use a 30 cm. receiving antenna for 80% conversion efficiency, (i.e. lambda/antenna diam. = 143).
    I assume the rectifying circuit is simple.    I assume that the efficiency remains nearly invariant as the size of the coils (and the wavelength) vary proportionately together.   So try antenna diam = 100 microns on a chip of size say 200 by 100 by 50 microns for use as a chemistry chip in solution (as previously described by others); then the wavelength = 1.43 cm, i.e. microwave.   The antenna in the photo appears planar; assume this is so.   Then we have a power source for a chemistry chip.   As previously described, the informational output of such a chip can be broadcast on a separate frequency to be picked up by the original broadcasting antenna on a slightly different frequency for each individual chip.   This allows a multiplexed array of chemistry analysis chips to work in a single test tube of biological sample (as previously described by others).

    Are these assumptions correct?   I think this should work.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    sigoldberg1
    06/28/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • the size of coil can be shrunk a lot
    There are still a number of engineering challenges, says Schatz, including finding the best way to shrink the coils, which are made of copper, so that they can be integrated easily into devices of various shapes and sizes.
    ======
    If the coils is make of metal-type carbon nanotube with the diameter of about 1um, the size of coil can be shrunk a lot.

    Rate this comment: 12345

    gearss
    06/28/2009
    Posts:13
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • impractical design
    Why the coil (CoilOne) powers the speaker is so big?
    It is because the coil needs big space to collect sufficient energy from 3D space to power the speaker. The larger coil (which produces magnetic field around 3D space) emits much bigger power into space and the CoilOne only can receive some part of the power.
    The principle is simple and it seems the design never will be able to turn into a practical product. More metal wires to make the CoilOne has little effect to improve its efficiency.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    gearss
    06/29/2009
    Posts:13
    Avg Rating:
    3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.