Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Reinventing Cellulosic Ethanol Production

Continued from page 1

By Jennifer Chu

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Baniel says that the company's goal is to team up with fermentation plants to complete the last stage of ethanol production. "When we started, we thought we might need to go all the way to biofuel," he says. "However, we discovered that there are technologies for fermentation of sugars that are way ahead of anything that we possess."

The company anticipates that its pilot plant will be ready in the latter part of 2010. In the meantime, Baniel says that the company will test multiple steps of its process at various industrial plants in Israel to see whether the technology can run efficiently at large scales.

James McMillan, manager of biochemical refining process research and development at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, in Golden, CO, says that scaling up the technology to run robustly is the key to its long-term success. "The proof in the pudding is demonstrating it performs under robust conditions and can handle upsets that happen in the real world, all at a cost that's attractive in the marketplace," says McMillan. "That's what has to be shown." He adds that when it comes time to build a plant, the company may have to invest in expensive materials to contain HCL, which is extremely corrosive and potentially volatile, especially in its gaseous phase.

Another company that is using concentrated acid hydrolysis to produce ethanol is BlueFire Ethanol, based in Irvine, CA. The company is using sulfuric acid, which is slightly cheaper than HCL, to break down sugars from cellulosic sources like municipal solid waste and wood residues. John Cuzens, chief technology officer at BlueFire Ethanol, says that recycling HCL in a gaseous form may help improve sugar yields. However, he cautions that HCL-Cleantech will have to account for the increased risk associated with potential hydrochloric gas emissions.

"Their process may have chlorine gas escaping, and the chlorine gas will corrode everything outside and inside the reactor," says Cuzens. "So the carbon steel walkways--virtually everything in the plant they have to watch for."

Comments

  • Ethanol - Terrible Fuel
    Ethanol is a corrosive solvent with low energy value. It damages many fuel system components, increases air pollution such as ozone and formaldehyde. It can't be run through most conventional pipelines. It absorbs water which makes fuel go bad quickley. It has high volatility which increases evaporation into the air. And because it has lower energy, we get fewer mpg, which causes consumers to buy more volume of gas, and thus pay more in gas tax. Why must Technology Review keep telling us better ways of making a TERRIBLE FUEL? Better would be focusing on isopropanol (not made from food), or other high energy fuels which are compatible with existing equipment, and don't go stale.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    RD
    06/12/2009
    Posts:117
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Ethanol - Terrible Fuel
      It was entertaining to see how RD could be wrong on every point of his post. Was all the information about ethanol lifted directly from MegaOilron brochures? How is it that in Brazil 96% ethanol with 4% remaining water has been sold at the pump for more than 25 years without any of your imaginary problems arising?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      SirExcedrin
      07/09/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
  • methane
    why is there no research into biomass to methane?  this is a friendlier gas to handle than either ethanol or hydrogen..
    Rate this comment: 12345

    chir0pter
    06/14/2009
    Posts:10
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • ethanol
    there may be better fuels as you suggest.  the only three things ethanol has going for it are 1.)that there are a diversity of methods for producing it that are already in use, 2.)corn and sugar cane based ethanol, regardless of the food vs. fuel issue, have already created a robust market for ethanol, whereas other biofuels, even biodiesel have a very small market, and 3.)there are already millions of flex-fuel vehicles on the road capable of using it.

    Of course, natural gas also has an established infrastructure and a huge well-established market, so perhaps vehicles that run on CNG make the most sense.  The amount of CNG that is obtained from non-fossil-fuel sources is negligible at this time, but production of biomethane could probably be scaled up very rapidly in the future.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    richharding1
    06/16/2009
    Posts:9
    Avg Rating:
    3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Brain Imaging and IQ
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.