The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
An Israeli startup says that it has a cheap process to make biofuels from cellulosic materials.
A startup based in Tel Aviv, Israel, called HCL-Cleantech has reinvented a century-old process called the Bergius process as a much cheaper method to produce ethanol from biomass. The process uses concentrated hydrochloric acid (HCL) to breakdown biomass into sugars but has been too expensive for commercial use. The company, however, says that it has developed a way to recycle 42 percent of the HCL, pumping it back into the system and significantly reducing the cost of making ethanol.
"The only really innovative aspect of what we do is the recovery of the acid, which costs 10 percent of what it used to cost," says CEO Eran Baniel. But that tweak attracted interest from a number of companies in the United States, and recently HCL-Cleantech received $5.5 million in venture capital from clean-energy investors Khosla Ventures and Burrill and Company to build a pilot plant in the United States.
To produce ethanol from cellulosic sources like wood chips and corn stover, the feedstock first must be stripped into three parts: lignin, sugar-rich cellulose, and hemicellulose. These last two parts must then be converted into sugars, which can then be fermented into ethanol by organisms such as yeast. Conventional ethanol technology uses dilute acid solutions in a pretreatment phase to separate lignin from cellulose and hemicellulose. Expensive enzymes then break down cellulose and hemicellulose into simple sugars.
As a cheaper alternative, HCL-Cleantech uses a much stronger, concentrated HCL solution that combines the first two stages of ethanol production, simultaneously stripping away cellulosic sources and breaking them down into fermentable sugars. Baniel says that the acid hydrolysis is able to squeeze up to 97 percent of sugars out of cellulosic sources like wood. Using HCL also reduces the amount of unwanted by-products that normally occur with more dilute acid solutions. What's more, the concentrated acid reaction can occur at low temperatures, which reduces the energy required to run the system.
However, recycling HCL has proved a tricky challenge. Researchers have found that as HCL breaks down cellulosic sources like wood into sugars, it forms strong bonds with water that are difficult to break. Industries that recycle HCL, such as citric acid manufacturers, use expensive high-temperature and -pressure methods to evaporate water, isolating HCL.
Instead, the scientists who developed the technology for HCL-Cleantech came up with a cheaper route to separate and recycle HCL. They devised a proprietary solvent that attracts hydrochloric acid. They mixed this solvent with the HCL-water solution, and found that the solvent broke the HCL-water bond and extracted HCL from the water solution. The scientists then developed a method to get the solvent to release HCL as a gas, pumping it back into the system to break down more cellulose.
why is there no research into biomass to methane? this is a friendlier gas to handle than either ethanol or hydrogen..
there may be better fuels as you suggest. the only three things ethanol has going for it are 1.)that there are a diversity of methods for producing it that are already in use, 2.)corn and sugar cane based ethanol, regardless of the food vs. fuel issue, have already created a robust market for ethanol, whereas other biofuels, even biodiesel have a very small market, and 3.)there are already millions of flex-fuel vehicles on the road capable of using it.
Of course, natural gas also has an established infrastructure and a huge well-established market, so perhaps vehicles that run on CNG make the most sense. The amount of CNG that is obtained from non-fossil-fuel sources is negligible at this time, but production of biomethane could probably be scaled up very rapidly in the future.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
RD
212 Comments
Ethanol - Terrible Fuel
Ethanol is a corrosive solvent with low energy value. It damages many fuel system components, increases air pollution such as ozone and formaldehyde. It can't be run through most conventional pipelines. It absorbs water which makes fuel go bad quickley. It has high volatility which increases evaporation into the air. And because it has lower energy, we get fewer mpg, which causes consumers to buy more volume of gas, and thus pay more in gas tax. Why must Technology Review keep telling us better ways of making a TERRIBLE FUEL? Better would be focusing on isopropanol (not made from food), or other high energy fuels which are compatible with existing equipment, and don't go stale.
Reply
SirExcedrin
1 Comment
Re: Ethanol - Terrible Fuel
It was entertaining to see how RD could be wrong on every point of his post. Was all the information about ethanol lifted directly from MegaOilron brochures? How is it that in Brazil 96% ethanol with 4% remaining water has been sold at the pump for more than 25 years without any of your imaginary problems arising?
Reply