Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Quantum Leap in Lighting

QD Vision is using its quantum dots in LED lighting to produce more pleasing white light.

By Neil Savage

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Seth Coe-Sullivan flicks the switches on two desk lamps, and even from across the conference room, it's immediately obvious which light the chief technology officer of QD Vision is there to brag about. The light coming from the lamp on the left is a harsh bluish white. The lamp on the right casts a warmer, more yellow glow. Coe-Sullivan holds a hand under each lamp. The hand under the bluish light looks pale and sickly; the other looks darker and healthier. The harsher light lacks wavelengths in the red end of the spectrum, so there's no light to illuminate the reddish tinge that blood provides to human skin.

Quantum light: The plastic lamp containing an array of LEDs screws into a standard recessed ceiling socket. The yellow-tinted optic on the surface contains quantum dots that convert the light into a better white hue.
Credit: QD Vision

QD Vision, based in Watertown, MA, is promoting a new LED-based lamp that it made with Nexxus Lighting of Charlotte, NC. Nexxus makes a lamp designed to screw into standard sockets used in recessed ceiling lighting. It consists of an array of white-light LEDs encircled by fins that remove excess heat. QD Vision adds an optic--a plastic cover with a special coating that snaps into place over the LEDs.

It's that coating that makes the difference in the quality of the light. It consists of quantum dots--tiny bits of semiconductor material just a few nanometers in diameter. When excited by a light source--in this case, the LEDs--quantum dots radiate light in a wavelength that varies according to the size of the dot: a two-nanometer dot gives off blue light, a four-nanometer dot emits green, and a six-nanometer dot produces red. The company makes the dots in controlled sizes, then mixes them in the right ratio to get the desired color.

Story continues below


This color-tailoring ability solves one of the major problems with using LEDs for general lighting applications. LEDs are appealing because they last for years, use perhaps 20 percent of the electricity of a standard incandescent bulb, and are highly efficient at converting electricity into visible light instead of into heat. But to make white light, you either have to mix together LEDs of different colors or use a blue LED coated with a phosphor that emits yellow light to produce a whitish mix. The problem with the phosphors is that they don't emit evenly across the visible spectrum. They tend to have gaps in the green section and even more so in the red, leading to the harsher, bluish light. "You can't precisely tailor phosphors anywhere in the visible spectrum," says Dan Button, QD Vision's CEO.

Comments

  • Cost needs leap first
    I don't care how good it works when a standard light bulb can be bought at WalMart for less than a dollar and these cost about $100.  It would take  my lifetime to payback the difference. Also these compact florescent light bulbs do not give off the light they claim, nor do the last as long. So I am skeptically that these bulbs would really last for  40,000 hours.

    jmaximus9
    05/13/2009
    Posts:85
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Cost needs leap first
      I agree - these are a total rip off at $40-100.  I have used a broad variety of LED "bulbs" over the past two years - none of them lasted more than a few thousand hours.  They're all crap with wrap-around marketing. 

      I've also achieved a warmer light cast by using yellow/orange markers - this worked quite well, but the LEDs eventually die (and not in 40,000 hours - most were dead around 4k hours, some sooner).

      hankejh
      05/13/2009
      Posts:20
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
    • Re: Cost needs leap first
      In fact over 10 years of nightly lighting (say in living room) the difference in running cost between on old incandescent and one of these LED lights is about $400 (at 30cents/kWh which seems like a plausible average price over the next 10 years (at least in the UK - I don't know what expected prices in the US are). So if the bulb really does last for the 14,000 hours in question then you will save $350-odd.

      So it really is worth investing in low-power bulbs, even expensive ones like this, in well-used areas. CFLs are nearly as efficient (30-50lumens/watt) and also very cheap so if you don;t like the upfront prices get those instead. But in fact what you really want is the most efficient lights money can buy.

      wookey
      05/13/2009
      Posts:2
      Avg Rating:
      5/5

This discussion has been moved to our discussions forum.

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.