Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Print-on-Demand Power

Flexible carbon-nanotube supercapacitors could give more power to cell phones and other electronics.

By Katherine Bourzac

Monday, April 27, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

It's now possible to print out components for flexible circuits, resilient displays, and even lightweight x-ray imaging panels. But conventional energy-storage devices still weigh down these printed electronics. Now researchers have made the first printable supercapacitor. This high-performance energy-storage device performs better than conventional supercapacitors currently on the market. The device, which is made up of a gel electrolyte sandwiched between two carbon-nanotube electrodes, could be created using existing ink-jet printing methods.

Printed power: This supercapacitor was printed by spraying mats of carbon nanotubes onto two pieces of plastic, then sandwiching a polymer gel in between.
Credit: Nano Letters/ACS

Capacitors and batteries are both electrical-energy storage devices. These devices have complementary strengths and are often used in tandem in portable electronics. While batteries have a greater total energy-storage capacity, they cannot discharge as rapidly as capacitors. While batteries store energy in chemical reactions, capacitors store it in surface charge, so they can provide rapid bursts of power. In digital cameras, for example, capacitors often provide a rapid pulse of power when the shutter button is depressed.

Electrochemists are working on boosting the storage capacity of capacitors so that they can compete better with batteries, as well as on making batteries charge and discharge as fast as capacitors. But researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles, and at Stanford University decided to focus on developing a simpler manufacturing method. The printing techniques that they used to make the new supercapacitors are "dirt-cheap technologies," says George Grüner, a professor of physics at UCLA, who led the research with Yi Cui, an assistant professor of materials science and engineering at Stanford.

The new capacitors are made by spraying carbon nanotubes onto two pieces of plastic, then sandwiching a gel electrolyte in between them. In the resulting device, one nanotube network acts as the positive electrode while the other functions as the negative electrode. When a voltage is applied to the electrolyte gel, charges collect on the surfaces of the nanotubes, storing energy. "The performance of the device is comparable to other devices," says Cui. "The key is that everything is printable."

The printing process is simple: commercially available carbon nanotubes are suspended in water and then sprayed onto the plastic surface using an air gun similar to the head in an ink-jet printer. As the solution is sprayed, the water evaporates, leaving a randomly entangled layer of nanotubes on top of the plastic substrate. The two layers--each about 0.6 micrometers thick--are brought together to enclose a thin film of polymer gel that acts as the electrolyte. The gel is made by mixing powdered polyvinyl alcohol with acid in a mold. Whereas conventional electrolytes are liquid and therefore difficult to contain, the gel electrolyte won't spill, which makes it ideal for a flexible device, say the researchers.

"They get good numbers with a simple approach," says Paula Hammond, a professor of chemical engineering at MIT. She adds that developing cheap, printable energy-storage devices "is something we need to do to make flexible electronics."

Story continues below


The power density of the printed supercapacitor--how fast it can charge and discharge--compares favorably with existing supercapacitors. At 70 kilowatts per kilogram, Grüner says, it is "significantly higher than that of commercial devices." Although its low weight and flexibility make it promising for applications in portable electronics, the current prototype doesn't have enough total energy-storage capacity to operate a device like a cell phone without a battery.

The group is now working on improving the energy density of the capacitors in the hope of eliminating the need for a battery. "We are currently working on capacitors with significantly higher energy density, while preserving the power capability," says Grüner.

Comments

  • Fact Check
    Can someone confirm the given figure of 70KW per 1 kilogram??  If true, this would be a game changer for PHEV-40/BEV vehicles.  That energy density may not be good for celphones, but it sure is good enough for vehicles.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    tsaidak
    04/27/2009
    Posts:16
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Fact Check
      The figure of 70 kW/kg is almost certainly true - but it is not a the energy density per system weight, rather it is just the thin film CNT/polymer/CNT supercap energy density.  The figure goes down if you add in the weight of the plastic protection film and the electrodes.

      Also note that cost is not specified.  This technology is probably horrifically expensive like most advanced thin film tech - producing a single kilogram would probably cost hundreds of thousands of dollars currently.  We can hope the price goes down - over the next twenty years ;)
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Omi
      04/27/2009
      Posts:5
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      • Re: Fact Check
        I hear what you are saying.  So the real question then is how much gel per 1kg carbon nanotubes.  Still, 1kg is incredibly high density for 70kw.  At 100g gel to 1g carbon, for 70kw, that is still WAY under current batteries.  Keep in mind too that at 56kwh for a Tesla, only .786kg of carbon nanotubes would be needed.  For a PHEV-40, you only need 115g.  The next question - is there anyway to figure out g/m^2 for the nanotubes? 

        As for development, you may well be right.  I did not see that they mentioned a big technical hurdle that I saw.  They complained about size for cell phones, but a cell phone is not a car, where weight and volume are a trade off.  This could be ready for non small volume applications in as little as 3 years.  That they are "printing" these is already a money saver from an industrial view.  Just ask NanoSolar.

        The other game changing use is as a storage device for wind and solar.  If this so much as approaches $1/watt, then the whole storage debate for PV solar, wind or even the grid will go in an entirely different direction. 

        Too soon to bet, but this looks to be a technology to keep an eye on.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        tsaidak
        04/27/2009
        Posts:16
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
        • Re: Fact Check
          Regarding this, and other "ultracapacitor" strategies (real, or claimed) to power vehicles, there's an aspect of this that I wonder about, in terms of efficiency, in a practical sense.  Consider what is about to (allegedly) become a viable, real-life application...

          I’ve followed the eeester story in passing for a couple of years… eeester was pretty quiet, and last I had noticed NASA had interest in the technology for possible use in space probes (but then again, NASA had interest in “Black Light Power” technology to assist in ion propulsion, so I didn’t know what to make of that… I thought it might have amounted to an interesting “pipe dream” ala “isotope bombs” and the like.)  Then, it was recently announced that a car, the (Chinese-built?) Zenn, will be powered electrically using only the EE Ester, and I thought “Wow, it’s for real.”

          Assuming the eeester works as claimed, what’s irked me all along was the power conversion strategy they intended to use (I only found that out recently in reading about the Zenn.)  It’s a buck-boost converter.

          The buck-boost converter would seem to be the most simple, direct, and straightforward approach to the problem of adjusting output from a capacitor charged with great pressure, yet this strategy would have a poor duty cycle due to parasitic resistance… thus, a degree of inefficiency would seem unavoidably inherent to such a design.  Now, to get even nominal performance out of even a compact car will require between 50 KVA and 100 KVA of power (converting from horsepower, assuming efficiency to be fairly high.)  If a 12 volt DC motor were used, very large currents would be necessary to produce the electromotive forces required by a compact car. 

          The alternative to such would seem be a higher-voltage AC motor (perhaps 120 or 240 VAC, 60 Hz) with the conditioning/inverting power supply consisting of either (1) a power transistor array, or (2) vacuum tubes.  Either option could be microprocessor-controlled to invert the DC capacitor output to AC, while improving system efficiency while continually monitoring loads, yet the second option impresses me as possibly being more practical, even though vacuum tubes have become antiquated for most applications.

          First, I’ll summarize the possible obstacles of using a power transistor array, as I see them.  The most robust semiconductors commercially available can handle about 1 KVA.  Thus, it would take (at minimum) 50-100 of the largest power transistors readily available- operating in tandem- to meet the aforementioned drive requirements of a small car.  Constantly varying high loads, in addition to harmonics which would be introduced into such a system during city driving (in addition to power regeneration strategies proposed for braking to recapture the car’s momentum as current during braking) produce the kind of conditions that make semiconductors vulnerable to damage and failure.  Longevity or reliability could initially present design challenges.  Such a power conversion system would necessarily be complex, it would require cooling (probably liquid) and it would likely be relatively expensive to produce.

          Suppose vacuum tubes were used.  The disadvantages would include perhaps only 70% efficiency, and a need for water-cooling (likewise for a semiconductor array… similar to a radiator and water pump as on gasoline engines.)  2 EESTERS could form a +/- 3500 VDC supply, the control grids could be semiconductor controlled via a microprocessor to provide 120 or 240 VAC with supplemental conditioning components, for instance, which could drive an “off the shelf” motor of high-reliability using far less current.  Perhaps with an array of 2,4,or 8 pentodes, the power being directed to the pair most compatible with the charge-state of the capacitor.  The microprocessor could be interfaced to monitor loads and adjust grid potentials, and which tubes were powered to maximize efficiency.

          The advantages to vacuum tubes in this application, as I see them, are:

          1. Even high-power tubes are compact and light.
          2. Due to their design simplicity, they can be manufactured very inexpensively.
          3. Tubes are virtually impervious to damage from shorting, overloading, and harmonics.
          4. Tubes can handle 10 megawatts or more, with those rated over 10KVA water-cooled.
          5. The technology is simple, and has already been developed to an advanced stage, with the operation theory very well-understood. 
          6. Even very high-power vacuum tubes are compact, light, have few internal parts, are reliable, and can last up to 10 years. 
          7. Manufacturing methods, tools, and instruments for commercial production  already exist and have been highly-refined. 
          8. Their physical designs can easily be made highly-durable… for example, a high-strength polymer enclosure with inner ceramic or metal cylinders, in a rectangular enclosure including channels for coolant flow would be one possible configuration.

          Can someone see major flaws in this?
          Rate this comment: 12345

          ronnywhite
          06/19/2009
          Posts:1
  • POD
    Nice postings...Great informative about POD .If anyone know more about publisher problems and POD benefits visit http://www.bhavishgraphics.com/Publishers-printondemand.html
    Rate this comment: 12345

    bhavishgraph...
    07/22/2009
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Ultra-Efficient Gas Engine Passes Test
Technology Review March/April 2010

Current Issue

TR50
TR presents the 50 most innovative public and private companies of the year.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.