Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

A Catalyst for Cheaper Fuel Cells

Continued from page 1

By Kevin Bullis

Thursday, April 02, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

To increase the number of these sites, the researchers used a commercially available form of carbon that already has a large number of similarly narrow pores. Filling these pores with a nitrogen-and-iron-containing material and then heating up the mixture resulted in the much improved reaction rates.

The catalyst is designed to work in proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells, a type of fuel cell favored by automakers because it operates at relatively low temperatures and has high power density--that is, a relatively small fuel cell can produce enough electricity to propel a car. PEM fuel cells use catalysts at two electrodes. One catalyst splits hydrogen and the other promotes a reaction that combines protons and oxygen to produce water. The second reaction is more difficult to perform: in conventional fuel cells, platinum is used in both electrodes, but 10 times as much is needed on the water-producing side. The new catalyst replaces platinum on the water-producing side, eliminating almost all of the platinum in the fuel cell.

Recently, other nonprecious metal catalysts have been demonstrated in another type of fuel cell, called an alkaline cell, but these may not work in the acidic environment in PEM fuel cells. At the same time, many researchers are finding ways to reduce the amount of platinum needed, rather than replacing the material altogether. This could make fuel cells more affordable in the short term, although eventually, if fuel cells are to be used widely, a nonprecious metal catalyst will be needed, Adzic says.

Dodelet believes that while his group has "solved the problem" of increasing the activity of the catalyst, two more significant hurdles remain before it can be practical in fuel cells. First, the catalyst's durability needs to be improved. After 100 hours of testing, the reaction rates decreased by half. Second, because the catalyst can only work as fast as the reactants are provided, the transport of oxygen and protons into the material needs to be improved, something Dodelet plans to leave to fuel-cell engineers. Adzic says that the first step toward addressing the materials' durability will be closely studying the catalyst to better understand how it works.

Comments

  • Platinum Fuel Cells
    What is the amp rating for platinum fuel cells?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    JAY123
    04/03/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • Neither really works?
    It seems as though platinum has not yet met the benchmarks either. It would last for two or three years in a car before needing to be replaced at great expense, and it does not meet the 130-amp figure either.

    This less expensive iron-based catalyst may have genuine usability to power a home or an off-grid location. If it's cheap enough, it shouldn't be too bad to replace it every couple of weeks.

    We really need to move away from the idea of hydrogen cars though. Even if a car could be invented that was also affordable and made of abundant materials, the feasibility of a hydrogen infrastructure is about nil. We stand a far better chance of producing electric vehicles. They would rely on existing infrastructure, and they would have at least double the life cycle efficiency. The battery technology seems to be forthcoming as well.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    MakeSense
    04/05/2009
    Posts:93
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Neither really works?
      Another reason why we should move toward electric cars is safety. Gasoline is a highly explosive, flammable liquid. Dozens thousands people in the world die each year in car fires and gas explosions. Many more then in "war" in Iraq. Same true if you think about hydrogen.

      Batteries on the other hand are not easily ignitable. And flame from batteries are not so easily spreading around. Compare to burning liquids or gases. No chance of explosion. Plus some advanced types of li-ion batteries are not flammable.    
      Rate this comment: 12345

      TestPilot
      04/08/2009
      Posts:11
      Avg Rating:
      3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Prescription: Networking
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.