Catalyst recipe: Carbon black, iron acetate and a red or white filler material are used to make the final catalyst.
Science

Energy

A Catalyst for Cheaper Fuel Cells

The material could replace platinum in hydrogen vehicles.

  • Thursday, April 2, 2009
  • By Kevin Bullis

A new catalyst based on iron works as well as platinum-based catalysts for accelerating the chemical reactions inside hydrogen fuel cells. The finding could help make fuel cells for electric cars cheaper and more practical.

Fuel cell researchers have been looking for cheaper, more abundant alternatives to platinum, which costs between $1,000 and $2,000 an ounce and is mined almost exclusively in just two countries: South Africa and Russia. One promising catalyst that uses far less expensive materials--iron, nitrogen, and carbon--has long been known to promote the necessary reactions, but at rates that are far too slow to be practical.

Now researchers at the Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique (INRS) in Quebec have dramatically increased the performance of this type of iron-based catalyst. Their material produces 99 amps per cubic centimeter at 0.8 volts, a key measurement of catalytic activity. That is 35 times better than the best nonprecious metal catalyst so far, and close to the Department of Energy's goal for fuel-cell catalysts: 130 amps per cubic centimeter. It also matches the performance of typical platinum catalysts, says Jean-Pol Dodelet, a professor of energy, materials, and telecommunications at INRS who led the work.

The improvement, reported in the latest issue of the journal Science, is "quite surprising," says Radoslav Adzic, a senior chemist at Brookhaven National Laboratory in Upton, NY, who also develops catalysts for fuel cells. The new material meets a benchmark for hydrogen fuel cells set five years ago that "we thought nobody would ever meet," adds Hubert Gasteiger, a visiting professor of mechanical engineering at MIT. "For the very first time, a nonprecious metal catalyst makes sense."

Advertisement

The INRS researchers' key insight was finding a way to increase the number of active catalytic sites within the material--with more sites for chemical reactions, the overall rate of the reactions in the material increases. In previous work, the researchers had shown that heating carbon black (a powdery form of carbon similar to graphite) to high temperatures in the presence of ammonia and iron acetate created gaps in the carbon that are just a few atoms wide. Nitrogen atoms bind to opposite sides of these tiny gaps, and an iron ion bridges these atoms, forming an active site for catalysis.

Print

Related Articles

Cheap Diesel-Powered Fuel Cells

The cells might eventually replace the turbines in high-efficiency power plants.

Cheaper Fuel Cells

Carbon nanotubes could replace expensive platinum catalysts and help finally make fuel cells economical.

Platinum-Free Fuel Cell

A new fuel cell uses a cheap nickel catalyst.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

JAY123

1 Comment

  • 1048 Days Ago
  • 04/03/2009

Platinum Fuel Cells

What is the amp rating for platinum fuel cells?

Reply

MakeSense

99 Comments

  • 1046 Days Ago
  • 04/05/2009

Neither really works?

It seems as though platinum has not yet met the benchmarks either. It would last for two or three years in a car before needing to be replaced at great expense, and it does not meet the 130-amp figure either.

This less expensive iron-based catalyst may have genuine usability to power a home or an off-grid location. If it's cheap enough, it shouldn't be too bad to replace it every couple of weeks.

We really need to move away from the idea of hydrogen cars though. Even if a car could be invented that was also affordable and made of abundant materials, the feasibility of a hydrogen infrastructure is about nil. We stand a far better chance of producing electric vehicles. They would rely on existing infrastructure, and they would have at least double the life cycle efficiency. The battery technology seems to be forthcoming as well.

Reply

TestPilot

13 Comments

  • 1043 Days Ago
  • 04/08/2009

Re: Neither really works?

Another reason why we should move toward electric cars is safety. Gasoline is a highly explosive, flammable liquid. Dozens thousands people in the world die each year in car fires and gas explosions. Many more then in "war" in Iraq. Same true if you think about hydrogen.

Batteries on the other hand are not easily ignitable. And flame from batteries are not so easily spreading around. Compare to burning liquids or gases. No chance of explosion. Plus some advanced types of li-ion batteries are not flammable.    

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Lattice Power

PrimeSense

Facebook

Crowdcast

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement