Cheap Hydrogen from ScrapsTurning organic waste into hydrogen now works without expensive platinum.
It sounds almost too good to be true: add a few bugs to food scraps and waste water to generate clean hydrogen fuel. But over the past few years, researchers have been gradually working toward this promising scheme for producing hydrogen.
Now, with the help of an unassuming stainless-steel brush, microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) have taken another step forward. The steel brush can be used to replace the expensive platinum normally employed in the electrolysis cell's cathode, slashing costs by more than 80 percent. Hydrogen is an appealing, environmentally friendly fuel because burning it creates only water as a waste product. MECs harness the electrons produced by certain bacteria as those bacteria feed on biodegradable material. The bacteria sit on an electrode--the anode--as they metabolize organic matter in an oxygen-devoid chamber. Not being able to react with oxygen, the electrons travel from the anode to the counter-electrode--the cathode--where they combine with protons to form hydrogen. In late 2007, a team led by Bruce Logan, Kappe professor of environmental engineering at Pennsylvania State University, showed that they could improve the efficiency of this process: by adding a small jolt of electricity (0.25 volts) at the cathode. Until now, however, the researchers have relied on a platinum catalyst on the cathode to make the process fast enough. "The need to use a precious metal catalyst had been holding back further development of the technique, but now we have found a way to do it without platinum," says Logan. Compared with platinum, which acts as an effective catalyst when applied in a thin layer to a flat piece of carbon cloth, a simple piece of stainless steel is two-thirds less effective. But when Logan's team increased the surface area of the stainless-steel cathode by arranging the material in the form of a high-density bristle brush, hydrogen production rates increased to values that matched or even exceeded those of the platinum cathode. While the platinum cathode costs around 15 cents, the stainless-steel brush only set the researchers back 3 cents. |
Recyclable Hydrogen Fuel Tanks
09/08/2009










Comments
http://www.economist.com/science/tm/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11831730
vbond
02/23/2009
Posts:1
I wish the moderators would delete the first post from bigrobhollins, as it has nothing to do with the story.
bkshilo
02/28/2009
Posts:18
Comments unrelated to this article have been removed. Thank you for calling attention to them!
Brittany Sauser
Brittany Sau...
03/02/2009
Posts:32
How soon can method be commercialized so that cars and other gizmos can operate with hydrogen?
sandrafarmsc...
03/01/2009
Posts:2
Thomas
newtechnolog...
03/04/2009
Posts:1