Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

A Cheaper Solar Concentrator

Continued from page 1

By Tyler Hamilton

Friday, February 20, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

The trick is to mold the acrylic such that it bends the light in a certain direction when it enters the first optic. It must assure that the light maintains that angle to prevent it from escaping and guide it to the glass optic at the center. Precision is crucial--not just in the design of the optics, but also in creating the molds to mass-produce them.

The company expects that its first commercial versions of the system will be composed of acrylic wafers about eight square inches in size containing a secondary glass optic that's about twice the diameter of a nickel.

Ray LaPierre, a professor of engineering physics at McMaster University, in Ontario, Canada, and an expert in high-efficiency solar cells, first saw Morgan Solar's LSO prototype in December at a Canadian solar conference and walked away impressed. "Their design is certainly novel, is physically sound, can be cheaply manufactured, and has a good chance to revolutionize concentrator [technology] " says LaPierre.

But like other PV concentrators, Morgan Solar's technology still requires a tracking system to keep it facing the sun. Researchers at MIT have eliminated the need for trackers by developing special dye coatings that can absorb diffuse light, but Morgan Solar's technology is closer to market. Nicolas Morgan adds that trackers today are precise, reliable, and add "marginal" cost for 44 percent more power. Some business and engineering decisions must still be made, but he expects that the company will be able to build its system for less than $1 per watt by 2011--"and with some vertical integration, considerably less." This would lead to a product close to 30 percent efficient at costs competitive with thin film.

"I think the concept should be pursued," says engineering professor Roland Winston, an expert in nonimaging optics at the University of California, Merced. He does, however, question the use of acrylic as a concentrator material: "Acrylic has not been proven for long-term use, especially under concentrated sunlight."

John Paul Morgan says that's the main reason why the company is using both acrylic and glass in its system. The company has intentionally limited concentrations within the acrylic portion to 50 suns and has the smaller glass optic doing the heavy lifting. "We want this system to last for 25 years, so we're trying to really understress the material," he says. "Once we've proven we can push the acrylic further, we're going to shrink the glass optic."

A number of pilot projects planned for 2009 will test the concentrator in the field. The company expects commercial production to begin sometime in 2010.

Comments

  • A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3
    [Removed by moderator]
    Rate this comment: 12345

    phoenix
    02/20/2009
    Posts:172
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3
      Anyone can have a PV array?

      Yeah, sure. Anyone with 25K to spare. Say, what's it like on your planet?

      Seriously. PV is a rich man's indulgence. A way of assuaging their little consciences by pretending to be "greener than thou."

      Until the average couple collectively pulling in $70-80K a year can get one, it's just delusion and fantasy. Call me when I can get a unit for under $2K.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      ian807
      02/22/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      2/5
      • Re: A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3
        You have a point about the costs, but that's not a good reason to be rude. It seems to me that we have lost respect for one another if we respond in that tone. No energy engineering revolution can come about without cooperation or without the enthusiam of people with optimism that something can be done.

        The article you are responding just might solve that cost problem. Contribute; being cynical is easy.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        TooMany
        02/22/2009
        Posts:47
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
      • Re: A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3
        [Removed by moderator]
        Rate this comment: 12345

        phoenix
        02/23/2009
        Posts:172
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
        • Re: A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3
          Ian's basic factual problem is that he ignores learning curves. PV has a very good and consistent learning curve. Since PV is growing from a small base, it's easy to subsidize production (ie relatively tiny amount of money compared to revenues in the world of energy generation).

          Enough reasons to accellerate development through subsidies, can't we agree?
          Rate this comment: 12345

          Siphon
          03/01/2009
          Posts:146
          Avg Rating:
          3/5
    • Re: A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3
      What the deal, Phoenix?  You couldn't get your article published so decided to put it in the comments?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      flataffect
      02/26/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      • Re: A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3
        I have removed the postings that were not fit or appropriate for the comment section. Any questions or concerns please contact me--send me a message through the TR community or via email (brittany.sauser@technologyreview.com). Also, please remember to review our "Terms of Use" before posting a comment.

        Thanks,
        Brittany Sauser
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Brittany Sau...
        03/02/2009
        Posts:33
        Avg Rating:
        4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Tiny Devices Use Light to Grab Cells
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.