Energy

A Cheaper Solar Concentrator

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Friday, February 20, 2009
  • By Tyler Hamilton

The trick is to mold the acrylic such that it bends the light in a certain direction when it enters the first optic. It must assure that the light maintains that angle to prevent it from escaping and guide it to the glass optic at the center. Precision is crucial--not just in the design of the optics, but also in creating the molds to mass-produce them.

The company expects that its first commercial versions of the system will be composed of acrylic wafers about eight square inches in size containing a secondary glass optic that's about twice the diameter of a nickel.

Ray LaPierre, a professor of engineering physics at McMaster University, in Ontario, Canada, and an expert in high-efficiency solar cells, first saw Morgan Solar's LSO prototype in December at a Canadian solar conference and walked away impressed. "Their design is certainly novel, is physically sound, can be cheaply manufactured, and has a good chance to revolutionize concentrator [technology] " says LaPierre.

But like other PV concentrators, Morgan Solar's technology still requires a tracking system to keep it facing the sun. Researchers at MIT have eliminated the need for trackers by developing special dye coatings that can absorb diffuse light, but Morgan Solar's technology is closer to market. Nicolas Morgan adds that trackers today are precise, reliable, and add "marginal" cost for 44 percent more power. Some business and engineering decisions must still be made, but he expects that the company will be able to build its system for less than $1 per watt by 2011--"and with some vertical integration, considerably less." This would lead to a product close to 30 percent efficient at costs competitive with thin film.

"I think the concept should be pursued," says engineering professor Roland Winston, an expert in nonimaging optics at the University of California, Merced. He does, however, question the use of acrylic as a concentrator material: "Acrylic has not been proven for long-term use, especially under concentrated sunlight."

John Paul Morgan says that's the main reason why the company is using both acrylic and glass in its system. The company has intentionally limited concentrations within the acrylic portion to 50 suns and has the smaller glass optic doing the heavy lifting. "We want this system to last for 25 years, so we're trying to really understress the material," he says. "Once we've proven we can push the acrylic further, we're going to shrink the glass optic."

A number of pilot projects planned for 2009 will test the concentrator in the field. The company expects commercial production to begin sometime in 2010.

Print

Related Articles

Cheaper Solar Concentrators

Skyline Solar, a new startup, is combining conventional technologies to lower solar-power costs.

Cutting Coal Use with Sunshine

How solar-thermal energy could shrink coal plants' carbon footprint.

Solar without the Panels

Utilities are using the sun's heat to boil water for steam turbines.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

phoenix

172 Comments

  • 1090 Days Ago
  • 02/20/2009

A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3

[Removed by moderator]

Reply

ian807

1 Comment

  • 1088 Days Ago
  • 02/22/2009

Re: A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3

Anyone can have a PV array?

Yeah, sure. Anyone with 25K to spare. Say, what's it like on your planet?

Seriously. PV is a rich man's indulgence. A way of assuaging their little consciences by pretending to be "greener than thou."

Until the average couple collectively pulling in $70-80K a year can get one, it's just delusion and fantasy. Call me when I can get a unit for under $2K.

Reply

TooMany

125 Comments

  • 1088 Days Ago
  • 02/22/2009

Re: A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3

You have a point about the costs, but that's not a good reason to be rude. It seems to me that we have lost respect for one another if we respond in that tone. No energy engineering revolution can come about without cooperation or without the enthusiam of people with optimism that something can be done.

The article you are responding just might solve that cost problem. Contribute; being cynical is easy.

Reply

phoenix

172 Comments

  • 1087 Days Ago
  • 02/23/2009

Re: A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3

[Removed by moderator]

Reply

Siphon

152 Comments

  • 1081 Days Ago
  • 03/01/2009

Re: A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3

Ian's basic factual problem is that he ignores learning curves. PV has a very good and consistent learning curve. Since PV is growing from a small base, it's easy to subsidize production (ie relatively tiny amount of money compared to revenues in the world of energy generation).

Enough reasons to accellerate development through subsidies, can't we agree?

Reply

flataffect

3 Comments

  • 1084 Days Ago
  • 02/26/2009

Re: A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3

What the deal, Phoenix?  You couldn't get your article published so decided to put it in the comments?

Reply

Brittany Sauser

46 Comments

  • 1080 Days Ago
  • 03/02/2009

Re: A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3

I have removed the postings that were not fit or appropriate for the comment section. Any questions or concerns please contact me--send me a message through the TR community or via email (brittany.sauser@technologyreview.com). Also, please remember to review our "Terms of Use" before posting a comment.

Thanks,
Brittany Sauser

Reply

Advertisement

ultron07

3 Comments

  • 325 Days Ago
  • 03/27/2011

Re: A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3

Let us remember when one has made over $1 billion in 1900 and has successfully resisted anti-trust breakup legislation, successfully manipulated the stock market, avoided the payment of 945,000,000 in income taxes, manipulated the market in 1928, shorted his competition, profited from all wars and banned competitive practices, the poor startup does not do well. The Pentagon drives ALL research for military purposes and deprives the commercial markets and humanity of the benefits, only for the benefits of the few. Flash crashes can destroy all the shareholder's liquidity of ANY company in less than 4 hours. Look around you, above you and below you, and you will see the benefits of the greatest inventor of all time and also remember he died in absolute poverty. MIT is a great school.

Reply

terryshook

1 Comment

  • 540 Days Ago
  • 08/24/2010

cheaper solar concentrator

Brilliant!  Would love to get my hands on one to play with.  i love to experiment with solar on my pool and hot tub.

Keep up the good work.  It is inspiring.

Reply

DWagner

3 Comments

  • 308 Days Ago
  • 04/13/2011

Optics durability

This sounds like an interesting idea, but I believe it would be similar to a grooves out Fresnel Lens.
This may cause difficulty with dust.  I am really eager to see details.  Different optics have been used in other concentrators.  Look at www.Sol-Solution.net for a description of a Rainbow Concentrator which separates and concentrates the sunlight with one cheap lens.

Reply

DWagner

3 Comments

  • 308 Days Ago
  • 04/13/2011

Patent application for this


Application number: 12/554,481
Publication number: US 2010/0126554 A1
Filing date: Sep 4, 2009

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Lyric Semiconductor

Amazon.com

Apple

Zynga

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement