Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

A Cheaper Solar Concentrator

A new light-guiding optic combines low cost with high efficiency.

By Tyler Hamilton

Friday, February 20, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Nicolas Morgan holds up a square piece of clear, molded acrylic about a centimeter thick and shines a penlight directly at its flat surface. A green beam enters the acrylic and bends toward the center of the square. Morgan repeats the process at different points on the surface, and each time, the beam darts toward the center.

Guiding light: Morgan Solar’s high-precision optic--part acrylic and part glass--is molded so that light is trapped and bounces toward its center. A secondary glass optic concentrates the light to 1,000 suns and directs it to a tiny, high-efficiency solar cell. The low-profile design promises to reduce the cost of manufacturing and transportation.
Credit: Morgan Solar

The acrylic component--called a Light-Guide Solar Optic (LSO)--is a new type of solar concentrator that could significantly lower the cost of generating electricity from the sun. Unlike existing designs, there's no need for mirrors, complex optics, or chemicals to trap and manipulate the light. "It's pure geometric optics," says Morgan, director of business development at Toronto-based Morgan Solar.

Solar concentrators have emerged in recent years as a way to intensify the amount of sunlight hitting solar cells, which are the most expensive part of solar panels. To make solar power more affordable, engineers have sought to use less solar-cell material by concentrating sunlight onto much smaller spaces.

But this approach has its own challenges. Most concentrators tend to be complex systems that use special lenses, curved mirrors, and other optical components with a "nonzero" focal length. This means that there must be enough distance--an air gap--between the solar cell and the optic to properly focus the light. As a result, concentrator-based systems are usually packaged within bulky enclosures, with enough depth to accommodate the focal length and protect all components during shipping. This means higher material and assembly costs and more expensive shipping.

A couple of years ago, Nicolas's brother John Paul Morgan came up with the idea of a solid-state solar concentrator system: a flat, thin acrylic optic that traps light and guides it toward its center. Embedded in the center of Morgan Solar's concentrator is a secondary, round optic made of glass. With a flat bottom and convex, mirrored top, the optic receives the incoming barrage of light at a concentration of about 50 suns and amplifies it to nearly 1,000 suns before bending the light through a 90-degree angle.

Unlike other concentrators, the light doesn't leave the optic before striking a solar cell. Instead, a high-efficiency cell about the size of an infant's thumbnail is bonded directly to the center bottom of the glass optic, where it absorbs the downward-bent light. There's no air gap, and there's no chance of fragile components being knocked out of alignment.

Story continues below

"It's all about critically controlling the angles once the light enters the first optic," explains Nicolas Morgan. The design takes advantage of a phenomenon called total internal reflection--the angle at which a beam of light inside an optical material will reflect back into the material rather than escape.


Comments

  • A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3
    [Removed by moderator]
    Rate this comment: 12345

    phoenix
    02/20/2009
    Posts:172
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3
      Anyone can have a PV array?

      Yeah, sure. Anyone with 25K to spare. Say, what's it like on your planet?

      Seriously. PV is a rich man's indulgence. A way of assuaging their little consciences by pretending to be "greener than thou."

      Until the average couple collectively pulling in $70-80K a year can get one, it's just delusion and fantasy. Call me when I can get a unit for under $2K.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      ian807
      02/22/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      2/5
      • Re: A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3
        You have a point about the costs, but that's not a good reason to be rude. It seems to me that we have lost respect for one another if we respond in that tone. No energy engineering revolution can come about without cooperation or without the enthusiam of people with optimism that something can be done.

        The article you are responding just might solve that cost problem. Contribute; being cynical is easy.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        TooMany
        02/22/2009
        Posts:42
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
      • Re: A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3
        [Removed by moderator]
        Rate this comment: 12345

        phoenix
        02/23/2009
        Posts:172
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
        • Re: A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3
          Ian's basic factual problem is that he ignores learning curves. PV has a very good and consistent learning curve. Since PV is growing from a small base, it's easy to subsidize production (ie relatively tiny amount of money compared to revenues in the world of energy generation).

          Enough reasons to accellerate development through subsidies, can't we agree?
          Rate this comment: 12345

          Siphon
          03/01/2009
          Posts:134
          Avg Rating:
          3/5
    • Re: A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3
      What the deal, Phoenix?  You couldn't get your article published so decided to put it in the comments?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      flataffect
      02/26/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      • Re: A Brief History of Solar Power Part 3
        I have removed the postings that were not fit or appropriate for the comment section. Any questions or concerns please contact me--send me a message through the TR community or via email (brittany.sauser@technologyreview.com). Also, please remember to review our "Terms of Use" before posting a comment.

        Thanks,
        Brittany Sauser
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Brittany Sau...
        03/02/2009
        Posts:32
        Avg Rating:
        4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.