Features

A Zero-Emissions City in the Desert

(Page 2 of 5)

  • March/April 2009
  • By Kevin Bullis

Energy surplus: Masdar headquarters, shown in an architectural rendering, is designed to generate more renewable electricity than it consumes; it would be the first large-scale, multi-use building to do so.
©Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill Architecture

Breaking Ground
The Masdar Initiative is part of an ambitious plan to transform a resource-based economy--the third-largest exporter of oil in the world--into one based on knowledge and expertise. The name Masdar comes from the Arabic word for "source," and the plan is to make Abu Dhabi the Silicon Valley of alternative energy: a source of talent, patents, and startups in the very industry that could one day challenge the supremacy of oil. It's a daunting challenge to say the least, especially for a region that, according to Awad, "hasn't been known for innovation for a thousand years."

The city was conceived as a tax-free zone meant to attract clean-technology companies, largely from other countries. (The first tenant, General Electric, plans to build a 4,000-square-meter ­facility.) The Masdar Institute, the first part of the city to be built, is meant to be what Stanford University is to Silicon Valley. Developed in collaboration with MIT, which organized the curriculum and is helping to select and train the faculty, the institute will be a gradu­ate research school, offering master's degrees and, eventually, PhDs. Its first class of 100 students will start courses this fall. And if graduates develop promising ideas and start companies, they can look to the Masdar Initiative for capital. Of the $15 billion the government has set aside so far for the initiative, only about $4 billion is designated as seed money for building the city's infrastructure. (The city is expected to cost a total of $22 billion, the rest to come from outside investors.) The remaining $11 billion is earmarked for a range of investments; projects so far include a solar-cell factory in Germany, an offshore wind farm in the United Kingdom, and efforts to reduce carbon emissions in Nigeria.

Still, the city is the most visible part of the initiative. It is by far the largest zero-emissions and zero-waste project in the world, according to several experts. (A larger "eco-city" development near Shanghai doesn't aspire to zero emissions.) Efforts elsewhere have so far been limited to small to moderate-sized buildings and small communities, like a series of efficient row houses for 250 people in Wallington, South London. One of the most ambitious zero-emissions buildings to date, the Lewis Center at Oberlin College in Ohio, has 1,263 square meters of floor space. Masdar City will cover six square kilometers. Its headquarters alone, which will include offices as well as retail and cultural space, will occupy an 89,500-square-meter structure.

A detailed master plan for the city is complete, as are plans for the first buildings: the Masdar Institute and the headquarters. The city--which will include apartments and laboratories, but also factories, movie theaters, cafés, schools, fire stations, and so on--is intended to generate as much electricity as it uses. Its water will be recycled to save the energy costs of desalination. Vacuum tubes under the city will transport garbage to a central location, where it will be sorted, and as much as possible will be recycled. Trash that can't be recycled will be converted to energy through a gasification process and the leftovers incorporated into building materials. Sewage will be treated and some of it processed into a dry renewable fuel for generating electricity. The transportation system will include a light-rail line linking the development to downtown Abu Dhabi and the airport, as well as a personal rapid-transit (PRT) system with stations throughout the city. The PRT, a system of automated electric vehicles, will connect people to the rail line or deliver them to parking garages outside the city.

Video

As is typical for zero-emissions projects to date, the city will need to rely in part on fossil fuels--both during construction and for power at night, when its solar panels won't be producing any electricity. The goal is actually best described as zero net carbon dioxide emissions: to reach the zero-emissions target, the developers will turn to a system of carbon credits. As the city is being built, a 10-megawatt array of solar panels will deliver power to nearby Abu Dhabi city, reducing demand for electricity from local natural-gas-fired power plants during the day. The carbon emissions saved will offset the emissions produced at night, when Masdar draws power from those same natural-gas plants. This solar array, and additional panels that will be installed as construction continues and electricity demand grows, will also offset the carbon emissions from construction equipment, from the processes used to make building materials such as concrete, and even from consultants' flights into Abu Dhabi from cities around the world.

Print

Related Articles

What New Emissions Standards Will Mean to Automakers

Increasing mileage standards to 54.5 mpg won't require major new technologies, say experts.

Using Heat to Cool Buildings

Novel materials could make practical air conditioners and refrigerators that use little or no electricity.

Self-Cleaning Solar Panels

A technology intended for Mars missions may find use on solar installations in the deserts on Earth.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

lasertekk

146 Comments

  • 1084 Days Ago
  • 02/25/2009

Interesting...

An oil producing country taking the alternative energy route?  What's the 'behind closed doors' reason for this?

Reply

Kevin Bullis

178 Comments

  • 1084 Days Ago
  • 02/25/2009

Re: Interesting...

No doubt part of it is to make themselves look good. But they also seem to think they can make a lot of money with alternative energy.  The city itself is just part of the project--maybe the city will end up losing money, but provide valuable marketing for other efforts, such as making solar panels. But they do claim they can make money with the city, as well.

Reply

Mekhong Kurt

13 Comments

  • 780 Days Ago
  • 12/26/2009

Re: Interesting...

According to a friend of mine who lives there, they're also looking ahead to the day when they have no more oil, which apparently is somewhere around a decade up the road. Also, they understand the advantages of diversification.

It's nearly 2010 as I write, and with the economic body blow they've taken, it's not clear what will happen with this project.

Reply

o_obrien

1 Comment

  • 1084 Days Ago
  • 02/25/2009

What about solar concentrators?

I wonder why they're using large arrays of solar panels instead of smaller solar concentrator systems, which should be cheaper and more efficient. Plus, if they were using concentrators they'd have much smaller PV devices to worry about so washing them regularly would require much less water...

Reply

Kevin Bullis

178 Comments

  • 1084 Days Ago
  • 02/25/2009

Re: What about solar concentrators?

Solar concentrators aren't really smaller--the solar cell part is, but the collector isn't. These systems typically require tracking systems that are less than ideal for rooftops.

That said, they will be installing concentrated solar within the city acreage, but not on top of buildings.

Reply

IggyDalrymple

22 Comments

  • 1084 Days Ago
  • 02/25/2009

It's their money....

I agree, it's an interesting testbed for new technologies, but I'm very disappointed that TR has become a pulpit for GW religious dogma.

Reply

RD

212 Comments

  • 1084 Days Ago
  • 02/25/2009

Debt Load

$80 Billion of debt was incurred by Abu Dhabi to build Dubai World, and now they are in desparate straits.  With the loss of projected oil revenue, they now are trying to sell assets (at a loss) to meet the interest payments. The additional $15 Billion of debt for this eco project likely will force a work stoppage of this city.  Thus it is with feel good eco projects.  While they raise prestige, they still are mostly uneconomical.  A similar comparison can be made between US eco projects and traditional energy.  The eco projects usually are more expensive and drain investment money away from other productivity gains.  There is only so much capital to use for business and if the government increases taxes (to fund eco projects), the result will be decreased investment in production efficiency.  Some eco projects are wise investments, but the current political climate is throwing money at a wall to see what sticks.  Projects such as ethanol from corn damage our economy, our environment, and our common sense.

Reply

Advertisement

Kevin Bullis

178 Comments

  • 1084 Days Ago
  • 02/25/2009

Re: Debt Load

It's probably good to differentiate between Dubai and Abu Dhabi, both of which are part of the UAE. Dubai has been hit harder than Abu Dhabi, since Dubai relies more on real estate (it has very little oil of its own.)

Reply

DennisBuller

118 Comments

  • 1080 Days Ago
  • 03/01/2009

Government Built Cities?

  My focus is not so much on the green aspect but on the fact that their government is trying to build an entire city from scratch.
  Are their any successful precedents for this?
  I can only think of Saint Petersburg and the capitol of Brazil.
I think 300,000 people were killed building Saint Petersburg and in the capitol of Brazil they forgot to put in sidewalks and a ridiculous amount of people get run over every year.....
   Government at work!!
 

Reply

Grant837

1 Comment

  • 1034 Days Ago
  • 04/16/2009

Re: Government Built Cities?

China builds (starts or finishes) new cities of a million or more every year... it works pretty good for them, even if their methods do not match the western worlds tastes.  India should be doing the same, but I understand that democracy gets in the way... interesting thought huh?
Abu Dhabi is doing this because they full well that their oil revenue will dry up sooner than later, and want to replace that as exporters of energy technology.

Reply

Phineas

127 Comments

  • 924 Days Ago
  • 08/04/2009

Anticipating Oil Shortage?

The 'Peak Oil' proponents think that declining production will force exporting nations to cease exports in as few as eight years. Perhaps they are preparing for life with less oil.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Square

American Superconductor

Lattice Power

Apple

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement