The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
(Page 2 of 2)
George Pappas, a professor of electrical and systems engineering at the University of Pennsylvania and an expert in distributed control systems, says that swarm logic is a natural fit for energy applications. "REGEN is ahead of the curve on this," says Pappas.
Operation within a building is one thing, but less certain is whether swarm logic can be trusted to manage the grid itself. Chassin says that the engineering community is understandably wary of decentralized or "emergent" control systems for the grid because, while they work remarkably well in certain applications, the approach is not well tested.
Kerbel first came up with the idea of using a swarm algorithm to manage power consumption in 2005. "We were politely told that this style of control just isn't ready and requires far more academic research," he says. "It's difficult to think outside the command-and-control box and allow this leap of faith--that is, relinquishing decision-making capabilities to individual nodes of the collective."
It's a bias that Herb Sinnock, manager of the Centennial Energy Institute, in Toronto, admits to having. He says that engineers typically want constant feedback so that they can measure system operation and make refinements. REGEN's technology dispenses with all that, but he notes that its application will allow for some mistakes. "It's not like they're positioning control rods in a nuclear reactor core. We're talking about affecting the temperature in a room by half a degree, so there's room for error," says Sinnock.
Sinnock's institute has been working with REGEN to evaluate the performance of its devices in the field. Tests have so far demonstrated that building owners--of hospitals, hotels, shopping malls, factories, and other large facilities--could save as much as 30 percent on their peak-demand charges. Those savings, REGEN claims, more than cover the cost of renting the devices, which is an option for major electricity consumers reluctant to buy the technology up front. If the devices are purchased, the payback is less than three years, says Kerbel.
The simplicity of the installation is what impresses Sinnock most. "In a few hours, they can have the devices installed and figuring out their environment and surroundings," he says. Pappas, meanwhile, says that he expects there will be much more interest in this type of application over the coming years, pointing to a U.S. economic stimulus package that calls for more investment in energy efficiency and smart-grid technologies. "A lot of the big impact and low-hanging fruit is going to come from using this approach," he says.
Guest (JarVan)
Well, at least the wireless part is new.
Fort Collins, CO implemented a similar system 15 years ago in multi-unit housing within city limits. Control signals are sent via the power lines within individual apartment complexes. During peak demand a guy named Joe pushes a button at the utility company and nonessential appliances are pulled offline city wide. No expensive self thinking nodes required. And yes, if you're in the program you receive reduced utility rates.
Re: Well, at least the wireless part is new.
Sure, brute force "shut them all down" load curtailment solutions have been implemented years ago, but they cannot handle the subtle load balancing required in buildings with multiple loads, particularly HVAC loads, where simplistic fixed "X mins on, Y mins off" load cycling strategies can easily lose a building (i.e. heat it up too quickly to the point that it cannot be recovered).
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Bruceahz
38 Comments
Swarm Logic applies to individual hives only
This concept of "swarm logic" is useful and appropriate within one owner's building(s); I question its appropriateness for the grid.
Just as the real swarm logic only applies hive by hive, where self-interest is supplanted by group interest, these controllers only apply to properties owned by one entity. We (as a society) are a long way from letting someone else's refrigerator run at the expense of my power need, particularly when that decision might be "gamed" by the other party.
This is a different scenario than current peak load control deals where you let the power company turn off your AC briefly, for example. In that situation people believe that they are being treated equally with everyone else paying the same rate (that is, statistically, everyone with the peak-load control rate suffers equally).
Reply
karayannis
1 Comment
Re: Swarm Logic applies to individual hives only
You may be misunderstanding the focus of the technology. REGEN's swarm logic-based controllers make autonomous decisions among multiple loads at a single site - typically a commercial or institutional facility with 100kW or greater peak demand.
Reply
kulykr
2 Comments
Re: Swarm Logic applies to individual hives only
Just to clarify things a bit, each REGEN controller must allow the attached load to run at least the minimum amount of time to satisfy its requirements. This makes gaming impossible as your minimum power need will always be met. Mind you, the controllers also have the ability to respond to grid wide requests for additional curtailment, by artificially lowering the energy requirement threshold for a building causing it to run at a slightly reduced energy level (below what would normally be required). This is part of the Demand Response capabilities of the controller. But in the typical scenario, a building operator would subscribe to a Demand Response program, and would be compensated for the inconvenience of having loads curtailed.
Reply