Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Platinum-Free Fuel Cell

A new fuel cell uses a cheap nickel catalyst.

By Katherine Bourzac

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Fuel cells are, in principle, the most efficient way to convert hydrogen fuel into electricity. But they require expensive catalysts such as platinum to split hydrogen into ions and electrical current. Cheaper metals simply can't withstand the harsh acidic environment of the fuel cell. Now researchers in China have developed a fuel cell that uses a new membrane material to operate in alkaline conditions, eliminating the need for an expensive catalyst. The power output of the new prototype, which uses nickel as a catalyst, is still relatively low, but it provides a first demonstration of a potentially much less expensive fuel cell.

Power polymer: A new polymer, shown in powdered form in this photo, can be used to make stable fuel-cell membranes that conduct negatively charged ions.
Credit: National Academy of Sciences/PNAS

Conventional fuel cells consist of two electrodes coated with a platinum catalyst that splits hydrogen fuel into acidic hydrogen ions and electrons. The electrodes are separated by a polymer membrane that conducts acidic hydrogen ions from one side to the other, creating an external electrical current. The new fuel cell, developed by researchers led by Lin Zhuang, a professor of chemistry at Wuhan University, in Wuhan, China, uses a new membrane that conducts alkaline ions called hydroxyl groups. Alkaline fuel cells work by reacting hydrogen and oxygen to create hydroxyl ions and water, a reaction catalyzed in the Wuhan University fuel cell by the nickel anode. The hydroxyl ions are conducted across the polymer membrane, generating an external electrical current.

Most researchers have been focused on acidic fuel cells because membranes that work well under such conditions have already been developed. A stable hydroxyl-conducting membrane has been "the holy grail of electrochemistry," says Robert Savinell, a professor of chemical engineering at Case Western Reserve University, in Cleveland. Such a membrane would allow researchers to build fuel cells and batteries that don't require precious-metal catalysts but can use cheaper ones like nickel.

Zhuang's polymer is comparable in structure to the highly conductive polymer Nafion that's used in conventional acidic fuel cells. It may prove to be less expensive than Nafion, which must be fortified with fluorine groups to protect it from acidic conditions. Other researchers are working on improving the power output and lowering the cost of acidic fuel cells by developing alternatives to Nafion, but these cells still require expensive catalysts.

Zhuang's group demonstrated the new membrane in an alkaline fuel cell that uses a silver cathode and a hydrogen-splitting nickel anode as the catalyst. The nickel catalysts used in previously developed alkaline fuel cells weren't very efficient because they quickly got oxidized, so alkaline fuel cells have used the same platinum catalysts as their acidic counterparts. The Wuhan researchers created an anode coated with nickel nanoparticles decorated with chromium that's more tolerant to oxidation than previous nickel catalysts.

Story continues below

The power output of the new fuel cell--about 50 milliwatts per square centimeter at 60 ºC--is modest. But as the first demonstration of an alkaline fuel cell that doesn't require expensive metal catalysts, it's an important proof of principle, researchers say. Fuel cells have a long way to go in terms of efficiency, long-term stability, and expense, says Frank DiSalvo, a professor of physical science at Cornell University, in Ithaca, NY. "This work enhances the research tool kit of materials we can explore to see if we can deliver on fuel-cell efficiency," he says.

Zhuang says that he and his group are working on improving the cell's power output by further tuning the catalyst and the membrane. They'll also have to demonstrate the long-term stability of the cell. "We believe that catalysts with higher activity and lower cost will soon be realized," he says.

Comments

  • Power density
    50 megawatts/cm^2 -- I doubt the surface of the Sun can boast that kind of power output ...
    Rate this comment: 12345

    dcbeethe
    12/16/2008
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Not Modest
    At 50 MW/cm^2 that'd be a pretty powerful cell, roughly six orders of magnitude better than anything on the market.  Perhaps the figure was 50 mW/cm^2?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    dansteingart
    12/16/2008
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Milliwatts
    Thanks for pointing out the typo. The story has been corrected to reflect that the cell's power output is in milliwatts.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Katherine Bo...
    12/16/2008
    Posts:23
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Milliwatts
      Could anybody put this in perspective for the Liberal Arts majors? Like, how many milliwats to burn a light bulb, run a cell phone ,TV, etc.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      benspock
      12/20/2008
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: Milliwatts
        yea. go read an arts review article.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        FunK Shway
        12/21/2008
        Posts:1
        Avg Rating:
        1/5
      • Re: Milliwatts
        "milli" means 1/1000 of whatever it's in front of.  So one milliWatt is 0.001 Watts.  100 Watts (say for a light bulb) equals 100,000 milliWatts.  So you can see that 1 mW is not very much power.

        Some rough numbers to compare:
        clock 0.01 Watts or 10mW
        cell phone or iPod 0.5 Watts or 500mW
        notebook computer 25 Watts or 25,000mW
        30" TV 100 Watts or 100,000mW
        microwave oven or space heater 1500 Watts or 1.5 million mW
        Rate this comment: 12345

        scarhawk
        12/22/2008
        Posts:8
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
  • Platinum vs. nickel
    The big deal here is that platinum is very rare and expensive.  It's been estimated that there is not enough platinum on Earth to build fuel cells to provide the power we draw from the (mostly coal-fueled) grid today.  So the low availability and high cost of platinum is, ultimately, a bigger barrier to the "hydrogen economy" than the current immature state of the technology.

    Scientists have been looking for a material to replace platinum as the catalyst in fuel cells for some time.  What this article is saying is that some scientists have been able to use plentiful, cheap nickel to make a fuel cell that works, but doesn't provide much power.  So conceptually it gives hope that there may be a path to affordable, mass-production fuel cells, but so far, this is a research prototype and it will take years more work to develop this into a commercial product.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    scarhawk
    12/22/2008
    Posts:8
    Avg Rating:
    4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Making 3D Maps on the Move
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.