Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Better Control for Fusion Power

Continued from page 1

By Katherine Bourzac

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

"People have been thinking about doing this for a long time, but the results were always inconclusive," says Marmar. He says that the key to the MIT group's success with radio waves was its development of more-effective methods for monitoring the plasma. "Most of the time, [physicists] do the measurements using the same neutral beams used to drive flow," says Marmar. The MIT group tracks the flow of its plasma by introducing impurities that it can monitor using x-ray spectroscopy.

Wayne Houlberg, a scientist in the Fusion Science and Technology Department at ITER, believes that the MIT group's work is interesting but still in its early stages. "Its applicability to the plasma conditions we expect in ITER will take time to evaluate," he says.

MIT's reactor is currently down for maintenance; running these experiments is so complex and expensive that reactors like MIT's typically run for only three to four months a year. When experiments start up again, says Rice, he and his colleagues will work on fine-tuning the use of radio waves for controlling the plasma. "Ultimately, you'd like to control the shape of the rotation," he says. For example, it might be better for the plasma in the center than for the plasma at the edges to rotate more quickly, or vice versa.

Practical fusion power plants are still decades away. In addition to confronting technological and scientific hurdles, fusion researchers have seen their funding stagnate. This year, the United States was to have significantly increased its financial support of ITER; the measure didn't pass Congress. "We never know for sure what our budget will be," says Marmar. "ITER is our best hope, but funding is caught in limbo."

Comments

  • Energy of the future!
    Fusion is the energy source of the future, and always will be!

    Do they even have a plan for turning this heat energy from fusion into electricity? Steam? Wonder how long it will take to get above unity once steam turbine losses are factored on. Another 50 years?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ddanimal
    12/10/2008
    Posts:3
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: Energy of the future!
      This type of hot fusion is almost certainly a dead end when it comes to commercial power generation. Utilities have consistently noted that they are not interested in this complex expensive unreliable technology. They want something simple, cheap, easy to work with. They don't want to invest in something they need a Ph.D. in to understand. There is no credible business plan for toroidal hot fusion, no credible cost reduction, no credible practical reliable operation.

      It is an interesting science project, however. If commercial power generation is the goal, toroidal hot fusion is an extremely unlikely contender even with said improvements.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Siphon
      12/12/2008
      Posts:146
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: Energy of the future!
        Actually, about 2-10 years, depending on what you count. Distinct from the approaches mentioned above, though with family resemblances to Bussard's work, the Focus Fusion group ( http://focusfusion.org ) has just received enough current and ongoing funding to do a couple of year's intensive work (about as much as a toroidal research group would spend in a few hours, $1.2 million) which should have a proof-of-concept reactor doing better than break-even with micro-burst pB11 (proton-Boron11) reactions (at about 330/sec., within a hollow anode cylinder smaller than your thumb). With its shielding and electrical housing, etc., the whole rig will be about the size of a home garage, and output about 5MW continuously, with a few days down time once or twice a year for servicing and re-fueling. No waste or stray radiation or radioactive components generated, and output should be nicely profitable at about ¼¢/kwh.

        Within 10 years, licensed factories should be turning out thousands of generators on every continent, to be trucked and installed wherever desired.

        The consequences will be electrifying. World-wide. Long before your toddler finishes high school, or maybe even grade school.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Brian H
        12/26/2008
        Posts:28
        Avg Rating:
        5/5
  • fusion power? radioactivity!
    At tens of millions Kelvin temperature, heat is in the form of gamma radiation and the helium nuclei produced are so fast that they can be considered alpha radiation. Seems dangerous rather than useful.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    djs
    12/15/2008
    Posts:24
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: fusion power? NOT MUCH residual radioactivity!
      The radiation is converted to energy, little escapes.  Alpha radiation is blocked by very thin shielding.  Higher forms take more shielding. 

      We manage with current FISSION plants today.  They leave scads of radioactive elements.  About the only residue from fusion plants (if they every get them working economically) is that after many years of operating, the containement structure will become radioactive from neutron radiation and will need to be buried or removed.

      I believe this would be less so if they used H3 fusion but the only large scale supply is embedded in the surface dust and rocks of the moon, created from constant solar bombardment over millions of years.  So we might get a race to strip mine the moon.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      erbium
      01/20/2009
      Posts:111
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • Still Not Working? ?
    I was involved in fabricating parts for an experimental 'cold' fusion reactor back in 79/80, after the breakthrough in understanding and controlling magnetics finally allowed experimenters to have a magnetic 'bottle' to contain the plasma.  I hadn't heard or read any thing more of any consequence in years.  I'm surprised that more progress hasn't been made in the past 30 years.  Man has been aware of what is basically involved in cold fusion for the past 60 or more years.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    olmon
    12/15/2008
    Posts:16
    Avg Rating:
    3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Brain Imaging and IQ
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.