Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Better Control for Fusion Power

A new control process may enable practical fusion reactors.

By Katherine Bourzac

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Nuclear fusion could prove an abundant source of clean energy. But the process can be difficult to control, and scientists have yet to demonstrate a fusion plant that produces more energy than it consumes. Now physicists at MIT have addressed one of the many technological challenges involved in harnessing nuclear fusion as a viable energy source. They've demonstrated that pulses of radio frequency waves can be used to propel and heat plasma inside a reactor.

Plasma power: Researchers in the control center at MIT’s fusion reactor, the Alcator C-Mod, where scientists have developed a new way to control plasmas.
Credit: P. Rivenberg/M.P. McNally, MIT

MIT's doughnut-shaped fusion reactor, the Alcator C-Mod, uses magnets to confine hydrogen in a turbulent, electrically charged state of matter called a plasma. By infusing large amounts of energy into the plasma, physicists can kick off fusion reactions that, in turn, release large amounts of energy. The MIT reactor is too small to generate practical fusion reactions that generate enough energy to keep themselves going--what's called a burning plasma. But the researchers have been working on ways to achieve this state in larger reactors, such as the planned International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER).

The challenge is keeping the plasma confined in a stable rotation, with just the right amount of turbulence and the ideal temperature gradients so that it keeps burning. Traditionally, physicists control plasmas by injecting high-power beams of inert atoms. Controlling turbulence and temperature is critical: the better confined the plasma, the smaller the reactor needs to be and the less power required.

Story continues below


When directed well, inert beams in today's reactors "have substantial momentum and drag the plasma with them," says Earl Marmar, head of MIT's Alcator project. They also "heat" the plasma, supplying energy to kick-start fusion reactions. Marmar anticipates that in the future, the beam technique simply won't work: it will be able to impart enough energy, but not enough momentum.

MIT researchers led by John Rice and Yijun Lin have experimentally demonstrated that radio waves--which will be able to penetrate large plasmas like ITER's--can give plasma both energy and momentum. The MIT group placed powerful antennas at the edge of the reactor to launch two frequencies of radio waves into the plasma. One group of waves is attuned to protons. When these waves collide with protons, they heat up; the protons, in turn, collide with the hydrogen isotope fuel. The second group of waves is attuned to lightweight helium isotopes that the MIT group adds to the mix. These waves collide with the helium, imparting their momentum to the isotopes, which push the rest of the plasma. These experiments were described last week in the journal Physical Review Letters.

Comments

  • Energy of the future!
    Fusion is the energy source of the future, and always will be!

    Do they even have a plan for turning this heat energy from fusion into electricity? Steam? Wonder how long it will take to get above unity once steam turbine losses are factored on. Another 50 years?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ddanimal
    12/10/2008
    Posts:3
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: Energy of the future!
      This type of hot fusion is almost certainly a dead end when it comes to commercial power generation. Utilities have consistently noted that they are not interested in this complex expensive unreliable technology. They want something simple, cheap, easy to work with. They don't want to invest in something they need a Ph.D. in to understand. There is no credible business plan for toroidal hot fusion, no credible cost reduction, no credible practical reliable operation.

      It is an interesting science project, however. If commercial power generation is the goal, toroidal hot fusion is an extremely unlikely contender even with said improvements.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Siphon
      12/12/2008
      Posts:152
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: Energy of the future!
        Actually, about 2-10 years, depending on what you count. Distinct from the approaches mentioned above, though with family resemblances to Bussard's work, the Focus Fusion group ( http://focusfusion.org ) has just received enough current and ongoing funding to do a couple of year's intensive work (about as much as a toroidal research group would spend in a few hours, $1.2 million) which should have a proof-of-concept reactor doing better than break-even with micro-burst pB11 (proton-Boron11) reactions (at about 330/sec., within a hollow anode cylinder smaller than your thumb). With its shielding and electrical housing, etc., the whole rig will be about the size of a home garage, and output about 5MW continuously, with a few days down time once or twice a year for servicing and re-fueling. No waste or stray radiation or radioactive components generated, and output should be nicely profitable at about ¼¢/kwh.

        Within 10 years, licensed factories should be turning out thousands of generators on every continent, to be trucked and installed wherever desired.

        The consequences will be electrifying. World-wide. Long before your toddler finishes high school, or maybe even grade school.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Brian H
        12/26/2008
        Posts:37
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
  • fusion power? radioactivity!
    At tens of millions Kelvin temperature, heat is in the form of gamma radiation and the helium nuclei produced are so fast that they can be considered alpha radiation. Seems dangerous rather than useful.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    djs
    12/15/2008
    Posts:24
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: fusion power? NOT MUCH residual radioactivity!
      The radiation is converted to energy, little escapes.  Alpha radiation is blocked by very thin shielding.  Higher forms take more shielding. 

      We manage with current FISSION plants today.  They leave scads of radioactive elements.  About the only residue from fusion plants (if they every get them working economically) is that after many years of operating, the containement structure will become radioactive from neutron radiation and will need to be buried or removed.

      I believe this would be less so if they used H3 fusion but the only large scale supply is embedded in the surface dust and rocks of the moon, created from constant solar bombardment over millions of years.  So we might get a race to strip mine the moon.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      erbium
      01/20/2009
      Posts:136
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • Still Not Working? ?
    I was involved in fabricating parts for an experimental 'cold' fusion reactor back in 79/80, after the breakthrough in understanding and controlling magnetics finally allowed experimenters to have a magnetic 'bottle' to contain the plasma.  I hadn't heard or read any thing more of any consequence in years.  I'm surprised that more progress hasn't been made in the past 30 years.  Man has been aware of what is basically involved in cold fusion for the past 60 or more years.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    olmon
    12/15/2008
    Posts:19
    Avg Rating:
    3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.