Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Bacteria Make Better Alcohol Fuels

Modified E. coli produce long-chain alcohol fuels that have advantages over ethanol and butanol.

By Prachi Patel

Tuesday, December 09, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

By engineering the metabolic process of the common E. coli bacteria, researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), have coaxed the microorganism into churning out useful long-chain alcohols that have potential as new biofuels. The bacteria-produced biofuels have between five and eight carbon atoms, compared with ethanol, which has two carbons.

Protein boost: Genes inserted into E. coli bacteria encode proteins (ribbon- and string-shaped structures) that convert an amino acid precursor (green and red molecule) into alcohols that could be used as biofuels.
Credit: James Liao, UCLA

The higher number of carbon atoms gives the biofuels as much energy per gallon as gasoline; by comparison, ethanol has 30 percent less energy than gasoline. And unlike ethanol, the new biofuels are compatible with today's gasoline infrastructure, says James Liao, a UCLA chemical- and biomolecular-engineering professor, who headed the research. Since the long-chain alcohols do not absorb water as easily as ethanol, they could be transported around the country in existing petroleum pipelines.

The longer-chain alcohols also have an advantage over butanol, another alcohol-based biofuel, Liao says. The long-chain alcohols separate from water much more readily than butanol does, so they would not need energy-intensive distillation. Many companies, including DuPont and BP, are trying to commercialize a process to make the four-carbon alcohol butanol using microbes. Liao's group has also engineered bugs that make butanol, and its technology has been licensed by Pasadena, CA, startup Gevo.

Liao and his colleagues use synthetic-biology tools to tinker with the amino acid metabolism of E. coli. All organisms produce a large number of amino acids, which are the building blocks of proteins. The researchers reengineer this metabolic pathway so that toward the end, the precursor compounds that would normally get converted into amino acids instead turn into long-chain alcohols.

To do this, the researchers insert genes into the bacteria that make them produce unnaturally long amino acid precursor molecules that have more than six carbon atoms. They also engineer two genes--one from a type of yeast, one from a cheese-making bacterium--into the microbe. These modified genes produce two new proteins that can convert the precursors into five-to-eight-carbon alcohols.

Startups LS9 and Amyris Biotechnologies are already reengineering microbes to produce hydrocarbon fuels. Both plan to begin commercial production of their fuels by 2010.

As is the case with the new work, both LS9 and Amyris use synthetic biology, rewiring the metabolic systems of microbes by inserting genes from other organisms, redesigning known genes, and altering the expressions of proteins. But the approaches of Liao, LS9, and Amyris all target a different type of metabolic pathway. LS9 researchers have reengineered the fatty acid metabolism of E. coli, while Amyris is tinkering with the pathways that produce natural compounds known as isoprenoids.

Liao says that the amino acid pathway could have a slight advantage. It is naturally more active in bacteria, so toying with it could be more productive. "We think this is intrinsically a more efficient way to make these compounds," he says. "So potentially, we'll have a higher yield."

Story continues below


The new long-chain alcohol fuel has grabbed the interest of companies, according to Liao. But there is still a long road ahead. One big challenge to overcome might be the long-chain alcohols' toxicity to the bacteria, says Chris Somerville, director of the Energy Biosciences Institute at the University of California, Berkeley. Ethanol is deadly to microbes at a concentration of around 14 percent. Butanol is even more toxic, killing microbes at about 2 percent concentration. This toxicity is one of the major problems facing butanol processes. Making a product that is relatively nontoxic to the culture, says Somerville, "is really important in getting the yield up."

Liao does not think that toxicity will be a show stopper. He says that the bacteria could be engineered to make them more alcohol tolerant. But, he says, increasing the yield will be in the hands of the company that licenses the new technology.

Comments

  • bacteria making fuels
    Should we also be looking at the consequences of these bacteria becoming part of the normal intestional flora?

    Maybe there should be a self destruct gene added.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    rhansing
    12/09/2008
    Posts:40
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: bacteria making fuels
      E. coli has been used in industry for years, different strains of the bacteria have nothing to do with the ones living in our intestines, their metabolites could be dangerous to human health. But there are security measures to prevent any leaks and infections. So, I wouldn't be concerned about that.
      If I were you I'd be more concerned about the potential hazardous wild E. coli strains living in your local water sources.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      qJohnnyp
      12/09/2008
      Posts:2
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: bacteria making fuels
        Part yeast part e-coli = long chain alcohol.

        Think of all the money we will save in beer if this takes root in our stomachs!

        I can't wait!
        Rate this comment: 12345

        techron
        12/09/2008
        Posts:13
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
      • Re: bacteria making fuels
        "...their metabolites could be dangerous to human health. But there are security measures to prevent any leaks and infection."

        This is not very reassuring. I can't feel very confident about any system that relies principally on "security measures" -- i.e., people not making mistakes. A similar lack of confidence separates anti-nuclear from pro-nuclear people -- do you believe the materials (nuclear fuel/waste or genetically engineered e. coli) can be securely processed, transported and stored, or do you think there's a chance they will escape, intentionally or unintentionally?

        Rate this comment: 12345

        superposed
        12/10/2008
        Posts:2
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
        • Re: bacteria making fuels
          I don't understand why you treat only this one bioengineered strain as dangerous. There are hundreds of E. coli strains producing different type of proteins and doing various biochemical reactions. None of them have caused a major problem yet, especially that they cant't proliferate in open environment like lakes, rivers or soil. They prefer warmer plases like your intestines. If anyone should not respect hygene protocols and let deadly bacteria into their system, well, that's one idiot less.
          Yes, there is a chance of other people catching the bug too, as contaminated human excrements could get to drinking water sources. But it wouldn't cause a pandemic or anything.
          There are news e.coli contaminating waters and closures of pools and summer resorts all the time, and this wouldn't be much different.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          qJohnnyp
          06/17/2009
          Posts:2
          Avg Rating:
          3/5
  • long chain alcohols
    This is a big deal. I am not aware of any catalytic for producing C5-C8 alcohols. As the article explains well, these alcohols are much better fuels than small-chain (C1-C3) alcohols.

    The biggest problem will be to convince the bugs to produce enough alcohol to make the process economical. There's been an effort over many years to convince yeast to ferment a high-alcohol beverage, with only incremental success.

    I believe the boiling points of the various isomers of C5-OH, C6-OH, and so on, are pretty different. Penanol has, I think, 11 isomers! I wonder what kind of functionality the engineered bugs are making?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ChuckInReno
    12/09/2008
    Posts:19
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Tolerance of long chain alciohol e-coli
    The article did not state the toleance of the new microbe.

    Is it less than the butanol bug at 2% ?

    Or more than the 15% of ethanol

    Or in between ?

    This is an important fact left out.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    techron
    12/09/2008
    Posts:13
    Avg Rating:
    3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Malleable Maps, Artistic Robots and Bubble Interfaces
Technology Review January/February 2010

Current Issue

Security in the Ether
Information technology's next grand challenge will be to secure the cloud--and prove we can trust it.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.