Protein boost: Genes inserted into E. coli bacteria encode proteins (ribbon- and string-shaped structures) that convert an amino acid precursor (green and red molecule) into alcohols that could be used as biofuels.
James Liao, UCLA

Energy

Bacteria Make Better Alcohol Fuels

Modified E. coli produce long-chain alcohol fuels that have advantages over ethanol and butanol.

  • Tuesday, December 9, 2008
  • By Prachi Patel

By engineering the metabolic process of the common E. coli bacteria, researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), have coaxed the microorganism into churning out useful long-chain alcohols that have potential as new biofuels. The bacteria-produced biofuels have between five and eight carbon atoms, compared with ethanol, which has two carbons.

The higher number of carbon atoms gives the biofuels as much energy per gallon as gasoline; by comparison, ethanol has 30 percent less energy than gasoline. And unlike ethanol, the new biofuels are compatible with today's gasoline infrastructure, says James Liao, a UCLA chemical- and biomolecular-engineering professor, who headed the research. Since the long-chain alcohols do not absorb water as easily as ethanol, they could be transported around the country in existing petroleum pipelines.

The longer-chain alcohols also have an advantage over butanol, another alcohol-based biofuel, Liao says. The long-chain alcohols separate from water much more readily than butanol does, so they would not need energy-intensive distillation. Many companies, including DuPont and BP, are trying to commercialize a process to make the four-carbon alcohol butanol using microbes. Liao's group has also engineered bugs that make butanol, and its technology has been licensed by Pasadena, CA, startup Gevo.

Liao and his colleagues use synthetic-biology tools to tinker with the amino acid metabolism of E. coli. All organisms produce a large number of amino acids, which are the building blocks of proteins. The researchers reengineer this metabolic pathway so that toward the end, the precursor compounds that would normally get converted into amino acids instead turn into long-chain alcohols.

Advertisement

To do this, the researchers insert genes into the bacteria that make them produce unnaturally long amino acid precursor molecules that have more than six carbon atoms. They also engineer two genes--one from a type of yeast, one from a cheese-making bacterium--into the microbe. These modified genes produce two new proteins that can convert the precursors into five-to-eight-carbon alcohols.

Startups LS9 and Amyris Biotechnologies are already reengineering microbes to produce hydrocarbon fuels. Both plan to begin commercial production of their fuels by 2010.

As is the case with the new work, both LS9 and Amyris use synthetic biology, rewiring the metabolic systems of microbes by inserting genes from other organisms, redesigning known genes, and altering the expressions of proteins. But the approaches of Liao, LS9, and Amyris all target a different type of metabolic pathway. LS9 researchers have reengineered the fatty acid metabolism of E. coli, while Amyris is tinkering with the pathways that produce natural compounds known as isoprenoids.

Liao says that the amino acid pathway could have a slight advantage. It is naturally more active in bacteria, so toying with it could be more productive. "We think this is intrinsically a more efficient way to make these compounds," he says. "So potentially, we'll have a higher yield."

The new long-chain alcohol fuel has grabbed the interest of companies, according to Liao. But there is still a long road ahead. One big challenge to overcome might be the long-chain alcohols' toxicity to the bacteria, says Chris Somerville, director of the Energy Biosciences Institute at the University of California, Berkeley. Ethanol is deadly to microbes at a concentration of around 14 percent. Butanol is even more toxic, killing microbes at about 2 percent concentration. This toxicity is one of the major problems facing butanol processes. Making a product that is relatively nontoxic to the culture, says Somerville, "is really important in getting the yield up."

Liao does not think that toxicity will be a show stopper. He says that the bacteria could be engineered to make them more alcohol tolerant. But, he says, increasing the yield will be in the hands of the company that licenses the new technology.

Print

Related Articles

Omnivorous Fuel Cells

A prototype fuel cell runs on a wide range of fuels without turning up the heat.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

rhansing

74 Comments

  • 1162 Days Ago
  • 12/09/2008

bacteria making fuels

Should we also be looking at the consequences of these bacteria becoming part of the normal intestional flora?

Maybe there should be a self destruct gene added.

Reply

qJohnnyp

2 Comments

  • 1162 Days Ago
  • 12/09/2008

Re: bacteria making fuels

E. coli has been used in industry for years, different strains of the bacteria have nothing to do with the ones living in our intestines, their metabolites could be dangerous to human health. But there are security measures to prevent any leaks and infections. So, I wouldn't be concerned about that.
If I were you I'd be more concerned about the potential hazardous wild E. coli strains living in your local water sources.

Reply

techron

13 Comments

  • 1162 Days Ago
  • 12/09/2008

Re: bacteria making fuels

Part yeast part e-coli = long chain alcohol.

Think of all the money we will save in beer if this takes root in our stomachs!

I can't wait!

Reply

superposed

2 Comments

  • 1161 Days Ago
  • 12/10/2008

Re: bacteria making fuels

"...their metabolites could be dangerous to human health. But there are security measures to prevent any leaks and infection."

This is not very reassuring. I can't feel very confident about any system that relies principally on "security measures" -- i.e., people not making mistakes. A similar lack of confidence separates anti-nuclear from pro-nuclear people -- do you believe the materials (nuclear fuel/waste or genetically engineered e. coli) can be securely processed, transported and stored, or do you think there's a chance they will escape, intentionally or unintentionally?

Reply

qJohnnyp

2 Comments

  • 972 Days Ago
  • 06/17/2009

Re: bacteria making fuels

I don't understand why you treat only this one bioengineered strain as dangerous. There are hundreds of E. coli strains producing different type of proteins and doing various biochemical reactions. None of them have caused a major problem yet, especially that they cant't proliferate in open environment like lakes, rivers or soil. They prefer warmer plases like your intestines. If anyone should not respect hygene protocols and let deadly bacteria into their system, well, that's one idiot less.
Yes, there is a chance of other people catching the bug too, as contaminated human excrements could get to drinking water sources. But it wouldn't cause a pandemic or anything.
There are news e.coli contaminating waters and closures of pools and summer resorts all the time, and this wouldn't be much different.

Reply

ChuckInReno

20 Comments

  • 1162 Days Ago
  • 12/09/2008

long chain alcohols

This is a big deal. I am not aware of any catalytic for producing C5-C8 alcohols. As the article explains well, these alcohols are much better fuels than small-chain (C1-C3) alcohols.

The biggest problem will be to convince the bugs to produce enough alcohol to make the process economical. There's been an effort over many years to convince yeast to ferment a high-alcohol beverage, with only incremental success.

I believe the boiling points of the various isomers of C5-OH, C6-OH, and so on, are pretty different. Penanol has, I think, 11 isomers! I wonder what kind of functionality the engineered bugs are making?

Reply

techron

13 Comments

  • 1162 Days Ago
  • 12/09/2008

Tolerance of long chain alciohol e-coli

The article did not state the toleance of the new microbe.

Is it less than the butanol bug at 2% ?

Or more than the 15% of ethanol

Or in between ?

This is an important fact left out.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Lyric Semiconductor

Cellular Dynamics International

Applied Materials

Novomer

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement