Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Ceramics That Won't Shatter

Continued from page 1

By Katherine Bourzac

Thursday, December 04, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Uncushioned by the polymer, the bricks would be brittle like most ceramics. But the polymer permits the brick-like layers to slide over one another when stressed, making the material resistant to fractures. Indeed, this brick-and-mortar structure is tougher than any ceramic ever made in the lab. "High toughness and high strength are usually incompatible" in a ceramic, says Eric Stach, a materials engineer at Purdue University who was not involved with the Berkeley work. But the ceramics created at Berkeley have as much strength and toughness as aluminum alloys, which "you can fly planes with," says Stach.

Though they caution that the nacre-like ceramics are in their early stages of development, the Berkeley researchers say the materials should make possible applications of ceramics that have seemed unattainable. "You could use ceramics to make the frame of a car instead of steel, and save fuel," says Ritchie. Antoni Tomsia, a materials scientist at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory who co-led the research, says that tough ceramics, which are good insulators, could do double duty as structural elements in energy-efficient buildings. And they might also be used in lightweight bulletproof vests and vehicle armor for the military.

The new work, say materials scientists, shows the way forward for tough biomimetic materials. Paul Hansma, professor of physics at the University of California at Santa Barbara, calls the work "astonishing" and says the performance of the new ceramic "raises the bar in this important field."

Ritchie and Tomsia are confident they can make the material even better. Natural nacre has ceramic structures an order of magnitude smaller than those in the Berkeley material, as well as a higher ratio of brick to mortar. Ritchie says the group is working on making the ceramic bricks smaller and closer together, and decreasing the polymer content. They're also experimenting with different mortars. Because the newly developed ceramic contains a gluey polymer, it would fail in high-temperature environments like the inside of an engine. So the Berkeley researchers are experimenting with metal fillers, which can withstand higher temperatures.

Comments

  • Super interesting article, but...
    It would be handy to have a few more comparative figures:

    1. How strong is this stuff compared to, say, steel?

    2. How much does it weigh compared to steel?

    3. How much do its precursors cost, compared to steel?

    My point is that this is very cool stuff, and I expect it to change the world eventually, but without knowing where it's starting from, it's hard to get as excited as I'd like to be. If the precursors are 1000x more expensive than steel and its strength/weight is equivalent, for example, it may never be a feasible alternative. On the other hand, if it's right now 100x more expensive than steel, and 10x the strength/weight, I'd infer that an industrialized process to make it might get us off steel in a decade.

    Obviously, at this point it's up to me to make those inferences, but without having a few more figures in advance, it's hard for me to be more than excited.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    nilsdavis
    12/05/2008
    Posts:6
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Super interesting article, but...
      When I was a kid, I was reading that Japanese researches are developing new ceramic materials that are super strong and light for use in car engines. Twenty five years later technology is still in infancy but another researchers are working on it and promising bright future...
      Rate this comment: 12345

      TestPilot
      12/06/2008
      Posts:11
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: Super interesting article, but...
        The rule-of-thumb for any new announcement of academic research results like this is the "20 Year Rule":


        On average, there will be a span of 20 years between the first academic journal paper demonstrating basic technical feasibility or validation and when the first economically feasible or viable product based on the technology is introduced, if one ever is.


        The relevance of this is that if there is some problem the technology is imagined to solve, that problem will not meaningfully solved that technology before such an economically viable commercial product exists.

        Further, only about 1-in-10 or 1-in-20 such announcements ever becomes a product, so it is simple the "ante in the pot" which has to be played (with real money) for 20 years to even see if it might be a winning hand.

        Examples include the Internet and TCP/IP and magnetoresistive memory.

        The former is obvious a winner in hindsight. I've used the Internet for most of its history so when the first CERN http code came out it was quickly clear what it could become. Yet up to the very end before the "hockey stick" most people were naysayers.

        The latter is an example where even having a viable product on the market doesn't assure domination or success in the long term - the jury is still out with MRAM in part because Flash has had a little more life squeezed out of it and MRAM is a little green still.

        So anytime you see any kind scientific or engineering breakthrough announcement you should always invoke the 20-year rule by default when considering the significance to current problems. Massive application of the technology to useful purposes is still in the distant future.

        I haven't gone through back issues yet, but the 20-year rule sounds like something Technology Review should be publishing a story about.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        jgruszynski
        12/06/2008
        Posts:1
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
    • Re: Super interesting article, but...
      Another question is dimensional tolerance in manufacturing. For example, it is quite difficult to maintain dimensions for molded ceramics parts when cured in a kiln and post-molding machining is not feasible due to the toughness of ceramics.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      NorthernPike...
      12/11/2008
      Posts:11
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • [no subject]
    Vulvox has begun researching heat exchange materials that transfer heat between hot and cold environments. They show very high heat transfer characteristics in experiments and can be manufactured from materials that can be scaled up and it is possible we can take advantage of economies of scale. They transfer heat much faster than stainless steel and they are much lighter than metallic materials.They will be applied in breakthrough products such as geothermal pumps, solar thermal energy collectors, and industrial heat exchangers with much higher efficiencies. They will be products that will increase industrial efficiency and that will pay for themselves even in a recessionary era. Vulvox has begun experiments on new ways to synthesize graphene paper, one of the strongest materials known to science.
    pictures of the graphene material shown at
    HTTP://VULVOX.tripod.com/id10.html
    Rate this comment: 12345

    protn7
    02/01/2009
    Posts:69
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re:
      More lying spam by vulvox's so-called president Neil Farbstein.
      A company with no employees, but a president - go figure.

      Neil spams tech websites with fraudulent claims of research. Nanothechnology, genetics, cold fusion - he's claimed it all.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      N O M
      06/02/2009
      Posts:23
      Avg Rating:
      4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Making 3D Maps on the Move
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.