Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Ceramics That Won't Shatter

A biomimetic ceramic that is strong and tough could be used to make lightweight vehicles.

By Katherine Bourzac

Thursday, December 04, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Ceramics are lightweight and hard, but you can't make jet engines out of them because they'd shatter like dinner plates. So, materials scientists have been trying to mimic natural materials that combine strength (a measure of resistance to deformation) with toughness (a measure of resistance to fracture). In particular, they've looked to the porous but resilient material called nacre that lines abalone shells. Now researchers have developed a method for manufacturing nacre-like materials in the lab. These new materials have mechanical properties similar to metal alloys and are the toughest ceramics ever made. The new method could lead the way to ceramic structural materials for energy-efficient buildings and lightweight but resilient automobile frames.

Biomimicry in bulk: The Berkeley researchers made large pieces of the tough ceramic, while other scientists mimicking tough natural materials have been able to make only thin films. A tough ceramic’s structure mimics that of abalone shells. This scanning electron microscope image (bottom), taken during a stress test, shows one source of the material’s toughness: damage is widely distributed in small, contained cracks.
Credit: Science/AAAS

Nacre, also known as mother-of-pearl, combines plates of stong but brittle calcium carbonate with a soft protein glue in a brick-and-mortar structure that's 3,000 times tougher than either constituent. Ordinarily, when scientists make composites in the lab, the resulting materials' properties average out those of their constituents. "When nature makes composites, the properties are better," says Robert Ritchie, chair of the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at the University of California, Berkeley, who co-led the ceramics research. That's because nature's composites have complex structures that are difficult to mimic. "People have tried, but can't get that fineness of structure," says Ritchie.

Story continues below

For years, scientists have been trying to design new materials based on tough natural materials like nacre and bone. The Berkeley ceramic "really shows that drawing our inspiration from nature in order to synthesize better materials can be very successful," says Julia Greer, a materials scientist at CalTech.

To shape their ceramics into nacre-like structures, the Berkeley researchers first create a water suspension of the material to be patterned--in this case, aluminum oxide. Then they chill it in a very controlled way. "You take the heat out at one end," explains Ritchie. This leads to long, thin structures that the researchers press into microscale, brick-like structures after heating them to evaporate the water. When this process is repeated, it creates a layered, porous structure of aluminum oxide bricks connected to one another by column-like structures--the same shapes found in natural nacre. Then, to mimic the protein glue in the abalone shell, the researchers fill the spaces with a polymer. This process is described online in the journal Science this week. Other groups have made thin films of biomimetic materials; the Berkeley group has succeeded in making large pieces.

Comments

  • Super interesting article, but...
    It would be handy to have a few more comparative figures:

    1. How strong is this stuff compared to, say, steel?

    2. How much does it weigh compared to steel?

    3. How much do its precursors cost, compared to steel?

    My point is that this is very cool stuff, and I expect it to change the world eventually, but without knowing where it's starting from, it's hard to get as excited as I'd like to be. If the precursors are 1000x more expensive than steel and its strength/weight is equivalent, for example, it may never be a feasible alternative. On the other hand, if it's right now 100x more expensive than steel, and 10x the strength/weight, I'd infer that an industrialized process to make it might get us off steel in a decade.

    Obviously, at this point it's up to me to make those inferences, but without having a few more figures in advance, it's hard for me to be more than excited.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    nilsdavis
    12/05/2008
    Posts:6
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Super interesting article, but...
      When I was a kid, I was reading that Japanese researches are developing new ceramic materials that are super strong and light for use in car engines. Twenty five years later technology is still in infancy but another researchers are working on it and promising bright future...
      Rate this comment: 12345

      TestPilot
      12/06/2008
      Posts:11
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: Super interesting article, but...
        The rule-of-thumb for any new announcement of academic research results like this is the "20 Year Rule":


        On average, there will be a span of 20 years between the first academic journal paper demonstrating basic technical feasibility or validation and when the first economically feasible or viable product based on the technology is introduced, if one ever is.


        The relevance of this is that if there is some problem the technology is imagined to solve, that problem will not meaningfully solved that technology before such an economically viable commercial product exists.

        Further, only about 1-in-10 or 1-in-20 such announcements ever becomes a product, so it is simple the "ante in the pot" which has to be played (with real money) for 20 years to even see if it might be a winning hand.

        Examples include the Internet and TCP/IP and magnetoresistive memory.

        The former is obvious a winner in hindsight. I've used the Internet for most of its history so when the first CERN http code came out it was quickly clear what it could become. Yet up to the very end before the "hockey stick" most people were naysayers.

        The latter is an example where even having a viable product on the market doesn't assure domination or success in the long term - the jury is still out with MRAM in part because Flash has had a little more life squeezed out of it and MRAM is a little green still.

        So anytime you see any kind scientific or engineering breakthrough announcement you should always invoke the 20-year rule by default when considering the significance to current problems. Massive application of the technology to useful purposes is still in the distant future.

        I haven't gone through back issues yet, but the 20-year rule sounds like something Technology Review should be publishing a story about.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        jgruszynski
        12/06/2008
        Posts:1
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
    • Re: Super interesting article, but...
      Another question is dimensional tolerance in manufacturing. For example, it is quite difficult to maintain dimensions for molded ceramics parts when cured in a kiln and post-molding machining is not feasible due to the toughness of ceramics.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      NorthernPike...
      12/11/2008
      Posts:11
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • [no subject]
    Vulvox has begun researching heat exchange materials that transfer heat between hot and cold environments. They show very high heat transfer characteristics in experiments and can be manufactured from materials that can be scaled up and it is possible we can take advantage of economies of scale. They transfer heat much faster than stainless steel and they are much lighter than metallic materials.They will be applied in breakthrough products such as geothermal pumps, solar thermal energy collectors, and industrial heat exchangers with much higher efficiencies. They will be products that will increase industrial efficiency and that will pay for themselves even in a recessionary era. Vulvox has begun experiments on new ways to synthesize graphene paper, one of the strongest materials known to science.
    pictures of the graphene material shown at
    HTTP://VULVOX.tripod.com/id10.html
    Rate this comment: 12345

    protn7
    02/01/2009
    Posts:69
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re:
      More lying spam by vulvox's so-called president Neil Farbstein.
      A company with no employees, but a president - go figure.

      Neil spams tech websites with fraudulent claims of research. Nanothechnology, genetics, cold fusion - he's claimed it all.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      N O M
      06/02/2009
      Posts:23
      Avg Rating:
      4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.