Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Carbon-Capturing Rock

Geologists discover that certain rock formations could sequester large amounts of carbon dioxide.

By Kevin Bullis

Tuesday, November 04, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Chemical reactions that pull carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere and store it in the form of solid rock inside geological formations could offset billions of tons of carbon-dioxide emissions each year, according to researchers at Columbia University, in New York. The scientists say that research done on large rock formations in Oman suggests new ways to sequester carbon-dioxide emissions to help lessen global warming.

Carbonated rock: A type of rock rich in magnesium, called peridotite, is laced with veins containing magnesium carbonate that form when the rock comes into contact with carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
Credit: Peter Kelemen

The researchers have shown that rock formations called peridotite, which are found in Oman and several other places worldwide, including California and New Guinea, produce calcium carbonate and magnesium carbonate rock when they come into contact with carbon dioxide. The scientists found that such formations in Oman naturally sequester hundreds of thousands of tons of carbon dioxide a year. Based on those findings, the researchers, writing in the current early edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, calculate that the carbon-sequestration rate in rock formations in Oman could be increased to billions of tons a year--more than the carbon emissions in the United States from coal-burning power plants, which come to 1.5 billion tons per year.

The Columbia researchers' strategy is attractive because of the very large potential to store vast amounts of carbon dioxide, says Marco Mazzotti, the head of the Separation Processes Laboratory at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, in Zurich. Typically, today's strategy for carbon sequestration involves pumping it underground, where it is trapped in porous aquifers. Since the Columbia researchers' approach would store carbon dioxide in the form of rock, it would eliminate the chance that the carbon dioxide would leak out, Mazzotti says.

Story continues below

The researchers found that the natural peridotite formations in Oman captured carbon dioxide in a network of underground veins. Peridotite contains large amounts of olivine, a mineral composed of magnesium, silicon, and oxygen. As groundwater reacts with the olivine, the water becomes rich in dissolved magnesium and bicarbonate, with the latter effectively increasing the carbon concentration in the water by about 10 times. As this water seeps deeper into the rock and stops reacting with the air, the magnesium, carbon, and oxygen precipitate out of solution and form magnesium carbonate, also called magnesite. Dolomite, which contains calcium, magnesium, carbon, and oxygen, also forms. As the magnesite and dolomite form, they increase the total volume of the rock by about 44 percent, causing cracks to appear throughout it, which creates a network of fractures as small as 50 micrometers across. This opens up the rock and allows water to penetrate further. "It's a little bit like setting a coal seam on fire," says Peter Kelemen, a professor of earth and environmental studies at Columbia University. "You're taking rocks that haven't been exposed to the atmosphere, and you're oxidizing them very fast."

The researchers calculate that the natural process can be sped up dramatically. Using techniques commonly employed by the oil industry to increase oil production, the rock could be fractured further, increasing the surface area for the reactions. Carbon dioxide captured from power plants could then be pumped into the rock, where it would trigger the formation of carbonates. Heating the rock would increase the rate of the reactions. What's more, because the reactions themselves generate heat, once they reach a certain rate, they will be self-sustaining. Initiating this self-sustaining reaction would require heating the rock to 185 °C, the researchers say, which could be done during the process for fracturing the rock. They calculate that in such a system, one cubic kilometer of rock would store a billion tons of carbon dioxide per year.

Comments

  • Intakes
    I wonder how large the intakes will have to be to accommodate the filters to avoid sucking large numbers of marine organisms into the pumps.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    boustrephon
    11/04/2008
    Posts:9
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Caution advised
    If this process is really self sustaining and could sequester more CO2 than we produce it could be very dangerous. Best to be absolutely sure what we're doing before we try it.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    smithsomian
    11/05/2008
    Posts:36
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Caution advised
      The researchers say that, although the reaction is self-sustaining, it's not difficult to quench. In the on-land example, carbon dioxide rich fluid must be actively pumped in to keep the reaction going (in this case, the reaction is only self-sustaining in the sense that no external source of heat is needed to maintain the optimal reaction temperature).

      In the shallow waters example, a hole that can be drilled can also be plugged up. That would stop the flow of water and carbon dioxide, and again the reaction would stop.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Kevin Bullis
      11/07/2008
      Posts:84
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • This doesn't scare anyone?
    I thought the assignment was to come up with an alternative that doesn't substitute massive environmental disruption in one area for another kind of massive environmental disruption. How do the people of Oman feel about this solution? Fail.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    josefski
    11/05/2008
    Posts:6
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: This doesn't scare anyone?
      The water coming back up the 'second' hole would be hot, rich in magnesium carbonate, poor in dissolved CO2, and more alkaline than the surrounding sea water.  That would likely disturb the marine ecology 'near' the hole, but how near?  If it's just a few feet, it probably wouldn't matter.  If it extended for miles, it probably would be a problem. 

      Ask the oceanographers for some help on this one.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      david78209
      11/09/2008
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • Ponzi game?
    It sounds like the oil and coal industry has dreamed up a scheme to continue their rape of Earth and it's residents by sweeping their s--- under the rug.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    djmoore
    11/06/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
  • Would beat the carbon trade system
    We're not junking gas cars/trucks for quite awhile. And solar gets more efficient & less expensive all the time.
    Certainly worth some trials.
    Would like to see map of where low depth minerals are concentrated.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    masimons
    11/07/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Technology Review July/August 2009

Current Issue

Search Me
Inside the launch of Stephen Wolfram’s new “computational knowledge engine.”
•  Subscribe
Save 41%
•  Table of Contents
•  MIT News
Advertisement

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter

Get Technology Review updates via the web, cellphone, or Instant Messager – Follow techreview on Twitter!

Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

Advertisement
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.