Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Reactors for the Middle East

Continued from page 1

By Kevin Bullis

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Another way to increase the amount of energy that can be extracted from nuclear fuel is to promote the creation of more fissionable material within the reactor itself. In ordinary nuclear power plants, some of the neutrons released during fission are absorbed by uranium-238, a material that does not undergo the process. When this happens, it triggers a series of reactions that produce other types of fissionable material that can generate heat in a nuclear reactor. Essentially, these reactions turn uranium-238 into fuel, allowing the plant to operate longer between refueling. Researchers have long known how to increase this fuel production within the reactor, even to the point that certain reactors can produce more fuel than they consume. But again, the danger is that creating too much new fuel could provide materials for nuclear weapons. So the researchers are investigating ways to increase fuel production, but not so much that it becomes a nuclear proliferation risk. The result would still be both more energy from a given amount of fuel and less waste.

Finally, Kazimi and Shatilla are designing the new plants to operate at higher temperatures than conventional reactors, thereby increasing the efficiency with which they convert heat energy into electricity. This would also make nuclear plants more useful as a source of heat for chemical reactions, such as hydrogen generation. Toward this end, the pair is investigating unconventional materials for coolants, such as molten salts, which are less corrosive at high temperatures than the water that is commonly used. The researchers are also studying the use of superheated steam, which involves boiling water to create steam, and then heating the steam to yet higher temperatures. The higher temperatures yielded will also require new materials in the core, such as a silicon carbide ceramic that Kazimi has been developing. This silicon carbide is made in the form of a mesh that can stretch without breaking as the reactor heats up and cools down.

Kazimi notes that the research project is still only one year old and that final designs could be several years away. Ultimately, Shatilla says, the goal is to produce designs in which "there is no possible pathway to divert nuclear material into a weapons track, and then at the same time produce nuclear power with the environment in mind." If the project is successful, he says, the designs could be useful in many more places than just the Middle East.

Comments

  • Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor
    Another technology to consider is the liquid fluoride thorium reactor. There is extensive information at http://thoriumenergy.blogspot.com/.

    After start-up, the LFTR requires no transport of uranium or plutonium in or out. In its liquid core the LFTR transforms Thorium-232 to U-233 which is the fissile fuel. However this potentially weapons-usable U-233 is contaminated with enough U-232 that gamma rays from its decay chain make the uranium too hazardous for potential bomb makers to work with.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    robert.hargr...
    10/22/2008
    Posts:27
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • < or >
    "The new reactors would have the added benefit of producing at least one-third of the waste of existing plants."

    Perhaps you meant "less than one-third"?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ms
    10/22/2008
    Posts:130
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: < or >
      1/3 or less would be more accurate. Thanks.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Kevin Bullis
      10/27/2008
      Posts:92
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: < or >
        "1/3 or less" is the same as "at most 1/3", but the article says "at least 1/3".
        Rate this comment: 12345

        ms
        05/22/2009
        Posts:130
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
  • Neutron poisons desireable?
    The introduction of neutron poisons could be a solution to the problems, but wasting neutrons is a bad thing for the efficiency of the reactor.

    Isn't there another way to do this?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Siphon
    11/17/2008
    Posts:146
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • LFTR
    I like the Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor (LFTR). The LFTR is a very simple, efficient, and elegant type of reactor. It can use any kind of nuclear fuel, bomb material, or nuclear waste product to produce very high temperature heat and at the same time breed more fuel in the bargain. This thrifty approach to nuclear energy greatly appeals to me, but I became even more interested in the LFTR when the details of a new patent were revealed by Dr LeBlanc (see below @ minute 53). It opens up the possibility of building a reactor that can run for 30 years without refueling in an unattended mode sited underground while it breeds new fuel within the thorium structure of the reactor itself.

    In order to get to this U233 that has been produced inside the very walls of this 200 ton reactor containment vessel, a proliferator must destroy and disassemble the reactor, lift its heavy reactor core out of a 100 meter deep reinforced aircraft crash proof hole in the ground, then cut the thorium up into small pieces while enduring heavy gamma radiation exposure, next reprocess these reactor pieces using isotopic separation since the U233 is denatured with enough U238 to make chemical separation of bomb grade U233 impossible, and do all this without being detected. Now, this is a tall order for any proliferator and may just be an impossible assignment.

    At the end of the service life of the Lftr, the reactor vessel is sent back to the factory where it is reduced to liquid fluoride salts that become the feedstock of a next new Lftr. This feedstock can only be used by the new Lftr and not for bombs. The waste products are held at the factory for a few hundred years to cool down before they are mined for the many precious elements contained within like platinum and iridium. Now that’s what I call a safe, efficient and thrifty mode of operation!

    For more information see the following:

    What Fusion Wanted To Be
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHs2Ugxo7-8

    Liquid Fluoride Reactors: A New Beginning for an Old Idea
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8F0tUDJ35So
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Axil
    03/08/2009
    Posts:7
    Avg Rating:
    3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Prescription: Networking
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.