Energy

Detecting Pollution with Living Biosensors

(Page 2 of 2)

  • Wednesday, September 17, 2008
  • By Jocelyn Rice

Catching an oil leak in its earliest stages is critical for directing appropriate cleanup efforts, says Van der Meer. A spill may not leave a visible trace, in the form of tar, until long after its most toxic effects have come and gone. By allowing for quick and easy detection of spills very soon after they occur, biosensor bacteria may make possible an earlier, more effective intervention.

Chemical testing will still likely be necessary, however. The bacterial sensors can give a rough estimate of the relative amounts of each chemical class, but only rigorous chemical analysis can determine exactly how much of each substance is present. "We tried to develop this method to be relatively quick, and to give you an overview," says Van der Meer, adding that biosensors could perhaps identify areas where more-extensive testing is warranted.

Van der Meer ultimately hopes to incorporate the glowing bacteria into buoy-based devices, which would continuously monitor seawater for hints of an oil spill and relay pertinent information back to a laboratory. His group is developing microfluidic systems that could maintain a constant, contained population of sensor bacteria to periodically test the waters.

Such a device would be subject to the vagaries of living organisms: its usefulness would be entirely dependent on whether the bacteria were alive and thriving. A negative reading could mean that no toxins are present, but it could also mean that the bacteria have died. "If they're not healthy," says Richardson, "the system is broken." Deploying living sensors also raises the risk of releasing genetically altered organisms into the environment. In this case, the chemical-sensing bacteria are theoretically harmless and unlikely to survive long in the harsh open environment.

Beyond detecting oil spills, Van der Meer's group has developed and tested a bacterial strain that detects arsenic in rice. Other potential applications include testing for pollutants in soil and groundwater, and for antibiotics in meat and milk. But for now, his vision for the future of biosensor bacteria remains largely aquatic.

"Why not have a robotic fish that swims through the water," he speculates, "and if it detects something, it could send out a signal by GPS? Technically, I think these things are possible."

Print

Related Articles

Another Chance to Stop the Gulf Leak

But BP's "top kill" method to stanch the spill could also break it wide open.

How Technology Failed in the Gulf Spill

The disaster exposes overreliance on blowout preventers that has been long disparaged by insiders.

Spinning Silk into Sensors

A simple process turns cocoons into optical devices with biological applications.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Silacon

55 Comments

  • 1246 Days Ago
  • 09/17/2008

Detecting Pollution with Mossbauer

You have a great idea there.  I think we can apply Mosssbauer spectroscopy to verify and determine levels of contaminant. We thought of a method to determine the health of the bacteria. Please contact us on this.  Your research is $valuable and necessary. 

Charles G. Nutter, CEO Silacon Corporation Silacon.com charles@silacon.com

Reply

Silacon

55 Comments

  • 1246 Days Ago
  • 09/17/2008

Medical use of Detecting Pollution.....

We medical applications. 

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Roche

Nissan

Pacific Biosciences

Calxeda

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement