Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

A Cool Fuel Cell

A novel low-temperature electrolyte could make solid-oxide fuel cells more practical.

By Kevin Bullis

Monday, August 04, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

A new electrolyte for solid-oxide fuel cells, made by researchers in Spain, operates at temperatures hundreds of degrees lower than those of conventional electrolytes, which could help make such fuel cells more practical.

Conductive crystals: A scanning transmission electron microscope image shows the crystal structure of a new electrolyte material for solid-oxide fuel cells that works well at room temperature.
Credit: Jacobo Santamaria

Jacobo Santamaria, of the applied-physics department at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid, in Spain, and his colleagues have modified a yttria-stabilized zirconia electrolyte, a common type of electrolyte in solid-oxide fuel cells, so that it works at just above room temperature. Ordinarily, such electrolytes require temperatures of more than 700 °C. Combined with improvements to the fuel-cell electrodes, this could lower the temperature at which these fuel cells operate.

Solid-oxide fuel cells are promising for next-generation power plants because they are more efficient than conventional generators, such as steam turbines, and they can use a greater variety of fuels than other fuel cells. They can generate electricity with gasoline, diesel, natural gas, and hydrogen, among other fuels. But the high temperatures required for efficient operation make solid-oxide fuel cells expensive and limit their applications. The low-temperature electrolyte reported by the Spanish researchers could be a "tremendous improvement" for solid-oxide fuel cells, says Eric Wachsman, director of the Florida Institute for Sustainable Energy, at the University of Florida.

In a solid-oxide fuel cell, oxygen is fed into one electrode, and fuel is fed into the other. The electrolyte allows oxygen ions to migrate from one electrode to the other, where they combine with the fuel; in the simplest case, in which hydrogen is the fuel, this produces water and releases electrons. The electrolyte prevents the electrons from traveling directly back to the oxygen side of the fuel cell, forcing them instead to travel through an external circuit, generating electricity. Via this circuitous route, they eventually find their way to the oxygen electrode, where they combine with oxygen gas to form oxygen ions, perpetuating the cycle.

The electrolyte--which is a solid material--typically only conducts ions at high temperatures. Santamaria, drawing on earlier work by other researchers, found that the ionic conductivity at low temperatures could be greatly improved by combining layers of the standard electrolyte materials with 10-nanometer-thick layers of strontium titanate. He found that, because of the differences in the crystal structures of the materials, a large number of oxygen vacancies--places within the crystalline structures of the materials that would ordinarily host an oxygen atom--formed where these two materials meet. These vacancies form pathways that allow the oxygen ions to move through the material, improving the conductivity of the materials at room temperature by a factor of 100 million.

Story continues below

The material is still some way from being incorporated into commercial fuel cells. For one thing, the large improvement in ionic conductivity will require further verification, Wachsman says, especially in light of the difficulty of measuring the performance of extremely thin materials. Second, the direction of the improved conductivity--along the plane of the material rather than perpendicular to it--will require a redesign of today's fuel cells. What's more, the limiting factor for the temperature in fuel cells now is the electrode materials. Before room temperature solid-oxide fuel cells are possible, these will also need to be improved.

Yet if initial results are confirmed by future research, the new materials will represent a significant advance. Ivan Schuller, a professor of physics at the University of California, San Diego, says that this represents a major change in the performance of electrolytes. He adds, "It will surely motivate much new work by others."

Comments

  • Hydrogen is not a fuel
    It's an energy carrier, and not a very good one at that. Please remove it from the 'fuel' list.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Siphon
    08/04/2008
    Posts:145
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Hydrogen is not a fuel
      "Hydrogen is an energy carrier..."  Yes, one that can be burned to release that energy.  All fuels are energy carriers.  That is what makes them fuels.

      At this time, admittably, most (if not all) methods of generating large amounts of hydrogen are much less efficient than making other fuels (often energy negative).  As we develop better methods to tap into the large amounts of naturally occurring renewable energy around us, hydrogen and fuel cells may provide a viable means of storing and releasing that energy on demand.  Look at last week's article about a recent advance in electrolysis, http://www.technologyreview.com/Energy/21155/.  Burning coal to make hydrogen is silly, but better sources and methods are coming.

      As long as it burns, it is a fuel. Good, bad, or indifferent.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Pyle
      08/04/2008
      Posts:3
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      • Re: Hydrogen is not a fuel
        Hydrogen is not a fuel??  I have seen this statement several times - and I am confused.  Hydrogen can burn - and when it burns - it generates heat.  Does this not make it a fuel?
        Rate this comment: 12345

        DavidRushton
        08/04/2008
        Posts:1
        Avg Rating:
        5/5
        • Re: Hydrogen is not a fuel
          It is a fuel, but one that must be made, which distinguishes it from nuclear fuels, petroleum, coal, etc. It would be more precise to say that hydrogen is not an energy source. It is a way to store energy, and as Siphon stated, not a particularly good one for road vehicles. It can be burned at high efficiency in fuel cells or internal combustion engines, but storing it requires thick walled high pressure tanks or hydrides, both of which are heavy and bulky for the amount of hydrogen they can store and release, and potentially hazardous. Even when stored as a cryogenic liquid, it is an extremely bulky fuel. The problem has always been storage more than production.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          cjameshuff2
          08/04/2008
          Posts:14
          Avg Rating:
          4/5
          • Re: Hydrogen is not a fuel
            Anybody know where we sit on making more complex fuels?  Battery vs. Hydrogen looks like the battle of the next decade for efficiency (weight, energy, et. al.) Ethanol and others have their drawbacks as well.  Is anyone aware of research looking at producing Propane / Octane / others?
            Rate this comment: 12345

            Pyle
            08/04/2008
            Posts:3
            Avg Rating:
            5/5
            • Re: Hydrogen is not a fuel
              Not 100% sure it's octane, but there are several types of engineered bacteria that produce hydrocarbons designed to work in gasoline engines. This publication covered LS9 and Amyris Biotechnologies's efforts to capture that market, about a year ago.

              Clostridium acetobutylicum has been used to ferment butanol and acetone (hence the name) since the 1920s, and it can eat cellulose. Butanol will work in gas or diesel engines without modification, and doesn't pick up nearly as much water as the shorter-chain alcohols. I have no Earthly idea why this technology isn't being revived, but I've heard vague rumors that Shell is looking into it.

              Coal-to-liquid technology is very well-developed. It was used by the Nazis and by South Africa during Apartheid...which is not the reason it's a bad idea.

              Large-scale reactors are available that turn biomass into 1. something like heavy fuel oil (thermal depolymerization); 2. a mix of charcoal, acetic acid, and methanol; or 3. synthesis gas. Any of these products can be run through the traditional hydrocarbon rigamarole to produce usable fuels.

              The real issue is that, for the forseeable future, the feedstock for biofuel will be scarcer than oil was in the 1990s.

              I'm also encouraged by photocatalysts that crack water (or, similarly, make carbon monoxide from carbon dioxide) using mostly sunlight, and a small electric current. Such a system, or similar ones powered by nuclear reactors, may be able to produce a limited supply of hydrocarbons by turning air and water into synthesis gas.
              Rate this comment: 12345

              polyparadigm
              08/04/2008
              Posts:6
              Avg Rating:
              5/5
              • Re: Hydrogen is not a fuel
                Making methane from coal is also pretty straightforward, and burns very clean and we have a large infrastructure for it already so this is interesting.

                Using hydrogen electrolysis could make some sense to make practical liquid or gaseous fuels for niche applications. Even big niches like most of shipping and airplanes. And to fill in the non-electrical road transport demand (eg with plug-in hybrids some fuel is occasionally needed).

                That kind of application could make sense. But as a competitor in the electric storage arena? No way. Too lossy by thermodynamics and entropy.

                We have to listen to entropy, otherwise we'll do silly things...
                Rate this comment: 12345

                Siphon
                08/05/2008
                Posts:145
                Avg Rating:
                3/5
                • Re: Hydrogen is not a fuel
                  In photocatalysis, something like 60% or 80% of the energy comes from sunlight, rather than electricity.  It's sorta like electrolysis with an optical boost.

                  I'm imagining a big solar thermal station with a catalyst window below the thermal collector window on some of its towers, giving the plant owners the option to sell some of their energy to the transport sector during summer months.
                  Rate this comment: 12345

                  polyparadigm
                  08/05/2008
                  Posts:6
                  Avg Rating:
                  5/5
          • Re: Hydrogen is not a fuel
            Precisely because hydrogen is a carrier rather than strictly a fuel, therefore not depleted by use, is what makes it so valuable. No matter how much or how often we burn hydrogen we will never run out of it. It takes millions of years to make oil, yearly crops to make alcohol but a few minutes to make hydrogen through electrolysis. Using solar energy to make and store hydrogen as part of an energy system, specially with low-temperature fuel cells, will allow us to stop burning our planet.
            Rate this comment: 12345

            Melchor
            08/04/2008
            Posts:1
            Avg Rating:
            5/5
            • Re: Hydrogen is not a fuel
              How about creating synthetic hydrocarbons by combining hydrogen with C02 taken from the air using nuclear power as the motive force?  At least you'd be sequestering the atmospheric C02 for a time as gasoline before it's released into the atmosphere again, only to be re-sequestered later as fuel by another nuclear driven facility.
              Rate this comment: 12345

              kearns
              08/04/2008
              Posts:29
              Avg Rating:
              4/5
            • Re: Hydrogen is not a fuel
              Hydrogen is quite difficult to store.  It would be nice to store energy as, e.g., methanol, which is already used to power device-scale, low-temperature fuel cells in e.g. power tools and cell-phone rechargers.

              I see no reason why an appropriate system of catalysts and/or microorganisms couldn't turn electricity into methanol fairly conveniently, but obtaining so much electricity may not be trivial.
              Rate this comment: 12345

              polyparadigm
              08/04/2008
              Posts:6
              Avg Rating:
              5/5
      • Re: Hydrogen is not a fuel
        It would indeed be more precise to state that hydrogen is not an energy source ie one that can be mined from the earth. Which we could say is the definition of a conventional fuel: coal, oil, natural gas. Hydrogen might be called a synthetic fuel, but that is misleading; it is no more a fuel than charged batteries. We could call batteries fuel cells too. But it's just so confusing. Hydrogen can be made from fuels but that doesn't make sense: more energy is lost in processing than is gained in the hydrogen, and what we get in stead is a very impractical fuel (here it would be correct to say it's a fuel, but in this occasion it's a fuel that makes no sense)

        Batteries and hydrogen made from splitting water are energy carriers as they carry energy that humans have already converted: electricity.

        Why go from high exergy electricity to lower exergy impractical hydrogen? It just doesn't make sense thermodynamically. Economics can advance, but thermodynamics remain a final barrier. Even if fuel cells cost nothing it's still not a very good transportation option.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Siphon
        08/05/2008
        Posts:145
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
    • Re: Hydrogen is not a fuel
      Siphon--cjameshuff2 has a good reply to your comment.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Kevin Bullis
      08/04/2008
      Posts:92
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: Hydrogen is not a fuel
        Thanks, that is a useful clarification.

        However, I disagree that production is not the bigger issue. Storage and distribution can be improved with new technology, but hydrogen production from water simply cannot be efficient, as governed by entropy. Storing electricity via hydrogen will lose more energy than you can get back out ie less than 50% round trip efficiency. It will never get better than this, and with this level of inefficiency adopted on a large scale we'll be burning fossil fuels and wasting energy for a long time and we cannot afford that.

        As pointed out above, there are good applications for hydrogen, including synthetic fuels and ammonia production (fertilizers). But it is not a contender for electric storage. Use batteries, maybe ultracaps for that.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Siphon
        08/05/2008
        Posts:145
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
    • Re: Hydrogen is not a fuel
      Energy terminology is pretty poor.

      I propose that we consider either energy sources or energy products. Oil, uranium, wind, sunlight, etc... are energy sources. Electricity, gasoline, hydrogen, ethanol, etc... are energy products. What makes a good energy source? What makes a good energy product? Those are questions we should ask.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      MakeSense
      08/08/2008
      Posts:93
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • [no subject]
    This will also make solid-state oxygen purifiers more simple and efficient, if the oxygen-ionizing electrode can be made to work near room temperature.  It's especially interesting to consider the device packaging options that might open up due to the in-plane conduction.

    I like the idea of running the fuel cell backward during regenerative braking, to build up a reserve of pure oxygen.  That sort of energy storage doesn't seem to be considered very often.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    polyparadigm
    08/04/2008
    Posts:6
    Avg Rating:
    5/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Making 3D Maps on the Move
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.