Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Cellulosic Ethanol Plant Opens

Continued from page 1

By Kevin Bullis

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Cane bagasse largely consists of bundles of cellulose that are surrounded by hemicellulose. Cellulose is made of long chains of glucose, a six-carbon sugar of the type usually fermented to make ethanol from sources such as corn. Hemicellulose, however, is made of five-carbon sugars, which typically can't be fermented using the same organisms as glucose. One of the things that makes Verenium's process novel, says John Malloy, the company's executive vice president, is its ability to ferment sugars from both cellulose and hemicellulose.

The process begins when the cane is ground up and cooked under high pressure with a mild acid to hydrolyze the hemicellulose and separate it from the cellulose. The five-carbon sugars in hemicellulose are then fermented using genetically modified E. coli. The cellulose is broken down with enzymes and fermented with another type of bacteria called Klebsiella oxytoca. This bacteria does double duty, since it also produces enzymes that break down cellulose, reducing the amount of enzymes from outside sources by 50 percent. The dilute ethanol produced from fermentation of both types of sugar is then distilled to make fuel.

In addition to opening the demonstration plant, Verenium is also starting to grow energy cane and to work with local farmers to ensure a steady stream of material for its planned commercial plants. Short term, the company says that it can rely on leftover bagasse from sugar production, but eventually it will draw on energy cane grown specifically to make ethanol. Provisions in the Farm Bill, which was recently passed by the United States Congress, will help by providing farmers with incentives to plant energy crops, says Carlos Riva, Verenium's CEO. The incentives are important because it takes two to three years for energy cane, a perennial plant, to become established and reach ideal production levels. As a result, farmers will need to start planting the crops next year, before commercial plants are built and there is a market for these crops.

The opening of the demonstration plant, and the current construction of a number of other demonstration- and commercial-scale cellulosic ethanol plants, marks a turning point for the industry, Riva says. The development of improved enzymes and fermentation organisms means that no further scientific breakthroughs are needed to make cellulosic ethanol commercially successful, he says. "There's been a tremendous amount of background work in science and technology development," he says. "We've learned so much about the process that the really important thing now is to start to deploy the technology at a commercial scale."

Comments

  • leftover
    What is and what do they do with the process leftover?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    mcberta2
    05/28/2008
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: leftover
      According to this website:

      "Cellulose and hemicellulose in biomass can be broken down into fermentable sugars by either acid or enzymatic hydrolysis. The main byproduct, lignin, can be burned for steam or power generation."
      Rate this comment: 12345

      jwer
      05/28/2008
      Posts:7
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: leftover
        Yes, they'll be using the leftovers to make steam for the process.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Kevin Bullis
        05/28/2008
        Posts:92
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
        • Re: leftover
          The left overs from the process also make excellent organic fertilizer.
          I am from a little town about 10 miles from the plant and am also a designer of two of the fire protection systems for this plant. I have watched with great interest the progress of this plant. The US should invest much more money in ethanol production. Un this mornings paper there is a front page write up on the plans for Verenium. They will build several more plants in southern Louisiana over the next years.
          I can see where this will go far.
          These plants will use several types of waste products including grasses and wood chips in an effort to find the best producer of ethanol.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          srd
          05/30/2008
          Posts:2
          Avg Rating:
          5/5
  • Feedstock
    Is important. I would prefer a recycled feedstock waste byproduct like the leftover bagasse from sugar production. But the article points out that their long term goal is a dedicated energy cane (virgin?) feedstock.

    That's why the bio-diesel industry is appealing. They can recycle used cooking oil to make the bio-diesel fuel. The feedstock is already there for the taking, so it does NOT need to be subsidized.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    energymv
    05/28/2008
    Posts:19
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Feedstock
      My concern about bio-deisel from cooking oil is simply the supply.  I can't imagine there is nearly enough cooking oil out there to actually supply any appreciable number of vehicles.  I would guess that once this process is established, and money is being made from this process, all the cane waste that currently exists around the world will be diverted to the process.  It is just a matter of economics, and will happen at some point as the process matures and develops.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      msreid
      05/28/2008
      Posts:9
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: Feedstock
        Absolutely no way the meagre amount of leftover cooking oil will ever supply more than a fraction of a percent of fuel demand. It's a drop in the bucket, and the nascent biodiesel industry along with biodiesel hobbyists are already tapping that supply out.

        That said, I feel biodiesel from more commercially oriented, purpose-built industries and crops might be a better solution than ethanol. Biodiesel would seem to be easier to produce and has more energy per liter than alcohol. Cars running biodiesel go 30 to 50% further on diesel than alcohol. It's much less hazardous that methanol and less flammable than ethanol. It would be nice if more diesel cars were available in this country to take advantage of diesel today and biodiesel tomorrow.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        ArtInvent
        05/28/2008
        Posts:28
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
        • Re: Feedstock
          Correct...If the roughly 11 billion liters of waste vegetable oil annually (mainly from industrial deep fryers in potato processing plants, snack food factories and fast food restaurants) could be collected and used to replace the energetically equivalent amount of petroleum (an ideal case), almost 1% of US oil consumption could be offset. However, use of waste vegetable oil as a fuel competes with some already established uses (source: wikipedia so feel free to dispute it!).

          As a comparison ANWR peak production would hypothetically cover roughly 1.3 mmbpd (about 4%) of our 20.8 mmbpd U.S. oil demand in 2006.

          I doubt that ethanol (cellulosic or corn) or bio-diesel will EVER power 100% of transportation in this country (not even at a ratio of say 20% bio-fuel / 80% petrol). Bio-diesel is appealing to me just because it deals with waste cooking oil, although there

          But the main reason that I don't see virgin energy crops (currently subsidized) as a serious sustainable fuel source is the increasing rate and severity of droughts, food shortages, and population growth in developing countries. A small fraction of the fuel demand is all that bio-fuel may ever provide unless we find alternative and substantially more efficient means of transportation.

          The current trend has as much to do with the farm lobby as it does with the need for alternative fuels.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          energymv
          05/28/2008
          Posts:19
          Avg Rating:
          3/5
          • Re: Feedstock
            If you are worried about drought and crop failure, have the plant run on Kudzu.  We haven't been able to figure out a way to STOP it from growing.
            Rate this comment: 12345

            makornitzky
            05/28/2008
            Posts:11
            Avg Rating:
            4/5
          • Re: Feedstock
            In the end, I don't think we can grow our way out of our fuel problems, no matter what we grow, or what kind of fuel we turn it into.  The problem is simply in the low energy density of plants.  Even if we can get 100% of the energy out of a plant (which is practically impossible), it will not be even close to how much energy you can get out of the same weight in petroleum.

            The other variable in the equation is time.  If we could have plants growing ultra-fast, and not stripping the ground of nutrients (which would require fertilizing, which uses petroleum), then the case for growing our energy might be better.  But I think in the end we will need to develop energy sources that turn much more of the sun's energy into energy we can use.  And I think that will only come with wind, solar, wave, tidal, etc.   Those are the sources that don't need ongoing inputs, and condense the sun's (and sometimes the moon's) energy automatically for us, rather than us having to grow it and alter it for use.
            Rate this comment: 12345

            msreid
            05/28/2008
            Posts:9
            Avg Rating:
            4/5
          • Re: Feedstock
            Indeed.  I just got a paper published in the journal 'Energy Policy' that reveals if ALL of US farm land was used to grow energy crops for ethanol, we could at most displace 12% of US transportation fuel in terms of energy consumed.

            We'll need a mix of alternative energies to get anywhere.
            Rate this comment: 12345

            pkassebaum
            05/28/2008
            Posts:11
            Avg Rating:
            3/5
            • Re: Feedstock
              We'll be hard pressed to ever supply as much renewable energy as we currently use with fossil fuels.  Even electric cars powered by solar/wind/geothermal/hydro will be a part of the solution but even with biodiesel and ethanol probably won't add up to what we currently consume.  We need smaller, more efficient vehicles, electric bikes, better passenger train routes, etc.  We simply have to consume less - a gallon saved is a gallon earned.  If we reduce our consumption 50% (which is doable, I've done it) then the production numbers are a lot easier to reach.
              Rate this comment: 12345

              nerfer
              06/03/2008
              Posts:2
    • Re: Feedstock
      The energy cane they are talking about is sorghum cane. Forgive my spelling, but the sorghum is what was sometimes use in days gone by to make a type of mollassis that was use in farm animal food.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      srd
      06/02/2008
      Posts:2
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
  • hemicellulose typo
    There seems to be a typo that might cause confusion:

    2nd page, 1st paragraph: "Hemicellulose, however, is made of six-carbon sugars...."

    2nd paragraph:  "The five-carbon sugars in hemicellulose are then fermented...."
    Rate this comment: 12345

    walt
    05/28/2008
    Posts:28
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
  • Why not liquefy cellulose directly?
    Cellulose itself can be used as fuel directly. Trouble is that it is solid - the polymer fibers are too long. If the polymers could be broken down into shorter oligomers and then liquefied, in say ethanol or methanol, then this mixed fuel could be used to power engines.

    So why go all the way to ferment cellulose into ethanol? Wouldn't it be more efficient to turn solid cellulose into "liquid cellulose"?...
    Rate this comment: 12345

    gabrielg01
    05/29/2008
    Posts:396
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • On the one hand...
    Well, it sounds like progress, but like most new technologies we'll have to wait and see.

    On the other hand, the DOE will put up most of the money to build the thing, and $1.28/gal will subsidize the output. If it takes that to maybe sell ethanol for $2/gal, then there is a long way to go.

    Also, a commercial plant that produces 20-30 million gallons/year? That's next to nothing. As one post already reminds us, the DOE does not foresee cellulosic making a large longterm contribution to energy supply. There's not realistically enough biomass, and demand will continue to grow.

    If you want to get the most energy from biomass for the least money, burn it for electricity.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    MakeSense
    05/31/2008
    Posts:93
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: On the one hand...
      Belatedly happened upon your post. Can anyone check my maths? More importantly, I see a lot of press release puff about how much cellulosic ethanol will be produced, but nowhere can I find how much feedstock in cubic yards or metres, and by weight is required to produce the claimed for likely production.

      Can you help me? I have just calculated some numbers and they are so remarkable that I have a horrible feeling I've made a stupid mistake, and I'm damned if I can find it. I've "done the math" as our American cousins have it, three times now.

      In an article by M.T.Klare it was announced that the U.S. Department of Energy has given grants of $385 Million towards the cost of manufacturing 6 cellulosic ethanol plants to go into production in 2012. That's grants not cost. This is where my problems start.


      The plants are forecast to produce 130 million gallons of ethanol per year. Sounds a lot.

      130 million gallons, at 42 gallons per barrel = 3, 095,000 barrels per year? Still sounds a lot.

      Divide that by 365 = 8,479 barrels per day?

      Global daily oil consumption is approximately 85 million barrels.

      The U.S.A. produces 3% of global production but consumes 25% of global production.

      So the U.S.A. consumes approximately 21,250,000 barrels per day?

      There are 1440 minutes in a day. So the USA consumes 21,250,000 barrels divided by 1440 minutes = 14,757 barrels per minute?

      The ethanol plants will produce, as above, 8,479 barrels per day. That is, 8479 /1440 = 5.9 barrels per minute?

      There are 60 seconds in a minute. So the USA consumes 14,757 / 60 = 245.95 barrels per second?
      The ethanol plants will produce 5.9 / 60 = 0.1 barrels per second.

      At a consumption rate of 245.95 barrels per second, the plants will satisfy US consumption demand for 0.1 / 245.95 = 0.0004 of a second?

      Where have I gone wrong? I can't believe this is right, but if it is, then as an exercise in pointlessness, it takes some beating, and is on a par with the EU's dash for wind.

      Bob Trueman
      Wales.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Bobski
      10/12/2008
      Posts:2
  • Cellulosic Ethanol as Alternative Energy Source.
    The issue of energy as the bedrock of any economy
    has not yet resonnated profoundly in the minds
    of individuals and governments to provoke
    uncommon emergency action world wide.
       Though scientific alternative energy
    break-throughs are being documented, none has
    so far compared to energy from petroleum with
    world wide supply.
    Questions that come to mind include: what
    would be the span or limitation of application
    of ethanol, as alternative energy source..
    What effective and efficient feasibility
    studies have been accomplished so far? What
    would be the cost of production, raw materials,
    and human resources? How sustainable is ethanol production and for how long would available
    resources sustain to overshadow any futher need for petroleum. It is doubtful, if at all,alternative energy could ever have broad application like petroleum oil and its
    derivative products.
      It is therefore on realization of uniqueness
    of petroleum oil and its role in our
    markets and on national economy of every nation that leaves critical
    thinking mind wondering why global nations
    have not surmmon a United Nation emergency economic session to discuss energy and
    petroleum oil with consequential
    devastating effects on economies,
    and not necessarily, individual country,
    forging its way on bilateral definition.
    A stitch in time saves an eminent monumental
    economic damage that has potential manifests
    in the near future.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    martinaatayo
    06/02/2008
    Posts:42
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
  • are these canes produced in US?
    They are talking about canes. I am not sure how much of these canes can be produced in USA. Does anyone know?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    mshuq2000
    06/10/2008
    Posts:1
  • Just burn it?
    As the poster MakeSense noted above, you can release all of the energy in cellulose by burning it.  My question is this: would it be more efficient, overall, to simply burn an energy crop in an ordinary electric power plant, and drive plug-in hybrid or all-electric vehicles?  If you returned the ash to the soil, you'd pretty much have a closed system.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jpdemers
    06/18/2008
    Posts:40
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • and the VINASSE??
    Hi I am a Agronomic Engineer and work in biofuels industry in Brazil. Do you guys have a clue about the leftover of the distilation process, the vinasse or stillage? Here in Brazil each liter of etoh produces 12 L of this residue and it is fully used as fertirrigation
    Rate this comment: 12345

    caiofortes
    05/14/2009
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.