Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

More-Powerful Fuel Cells

Continued from page 1

By Katherine Bourzac

Thursday, May 22, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Hammond synthesizes fuel-cell membranes using a technique called layer-by-layer assembly. She starts with a very thin membrane of the polymer used in conventional fuel cells. She dips it into a water solution of a positively charged polymer, then into one of a negatively charged polymer; the process is repeated until many layers are built up. The result, explains Hammond, is "a polymer backbone that resists the permeation of methanol" while still conducting protons.

The resulting 100-nanometer-thick membrane conducts two orders of magnitude less methanol than conventional, 50-micrometer-thick membranes do. And fuel cells incorporating it have a greater power output.

Hammond says that methanol is a better candidate to power portable fuel cells than hydrogen because it's a liquid and not nearly as flammable. "It's a dense power source that's safe to carry around," she says.

Savinell says that Hammond's work could have applications beyond methanol fuel cells. By picking the right polymers and varying assembly conditions including pH, says Savinell, "you can customize and optimize [the films] for any application." Layer-by-layer films might be used to improve the conductivity of hydrogen fuel-cell membranes and to increase the efficiency of ethanol fuel cells. Ethanol is safer than methanol but has similar drawbacks as a feedstock for fuel cells: ethanol seeps across the polymer membranes.

"The real promise is the power of the technology to make new materials," says Savinell. Hammond is now working on new fuel-cell membranes that contain none of the expensive conventional polymer.


Comments

  • ethanol fuel cells
    I'm guessing our soldiers would love for the Army to implement ethanol fuel cells.  Talk about dual use!
    Rate this comment: 12345

    dmm
    05/23/2008
    Posts:192
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • methanol, so what?
    Methanol can be efficiently produced from a wide variety of sources including still abundant fossil fuels (natural gas, coal, oil shale, tar sands, etc.), but also agricultural products and municipal waste, wood and varied biomass  (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methanol_economy ).

    Now, if methanol will be produced mainly from natural gas, coal, oil and tar sands,     then what is new? We still add CO2 to the atmosphere and we still deplete the atmosphere of oxygen.

    (A CO2 based greenhouse effect has never been proven scientifically btw, this is media hype: repeat the message over again, and we start to believe it.)

    Methanol as energy form is as dubious as hydrogen as energy form, and do not have the high efficiency as electricity  (efficiency = efficiency of creation, transport and usage of intermediate energy form).
    Why should we replace an efficient energy infra-structure (electricity networks) by an inefficient one?

    As long as academia is dominated by a few "enlightened" dictators, stupidity will be the output.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    kovavla
    05/26/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: methanol, so what?
      Among current conventional methods of electricity generation , the most efficientt ones are CHP (Combined Heat and Power) power plants with 20-45 percent efficiency . In addition they all should be centeralized , resulting in an average 40-50 % energy loss in the process of distributing electricity from the generation plant to the users .
      Using the fuel cell technolgy , in addition to the 65-85 % efficiency for conventional PEM or SOFC fuel cells , the energy loss in the distribution process is omitted too , because of the distributed energy production by fuel cells .
      The current research is , in my opinion , a boost in fuel cell technology , resolving the big "Cost" problem in addition to a greater efficiency ...
      Rate this comment: 12345

      A.Hashemi
      10/15/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
  • Energy density
    First, the energy density is stated as being similar to high end batteries, but then it is stated that they weigh less than batteries? Which one is it?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Siphon
    06/03/2008
    Posts:145
    Avg Rating:
    3/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

White Matter
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.