The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Polymer power: An inexpensive polymer thin film increases the power output of methanol fuel cells by 50 percent.
Avni Argun and Nathan Ashcraft, MIT
A cheap polymer material increases the power output of methanol fuel cells by 50 percent.
Methanol fuel cells have the potential to replace batteries as a lightweight power source for portable electronic devices. But fuel-cell materials are expensive, and fuel cells that consume methanol are inefficient. In particular, the membranes used in methanol fuel cells are expensive and waste fuel. Now researchers at MIT have developed a cheap membrane material that increases the power output of methanol fuel cells by 50 percent.
The energy density of a methanol fuel cell "compares to the best high-energy-density batteries," says Robert Savinell, a chemical engineer at Case Western Reserve University, in Cleveland, who was not involved in the research. And because they weigh less than batteries, methanol fuel cells are a promising power source for portable electronics. For the military, tanks of methanol for refilling fuel cells would be lighter than extra batteries that would have to be carried on long missions. The energy density of methanol fuel cells could also be an advantage in portable consumer electronic devices such as laptops and iPods. But commercialization of methanol fuel cells has been limited because of their price: they require a thick internal membrane made of an expensive polymer. And even with this expensive material, they use fuel inefficiently.
To overcome these limitations, Paula Hammond, a chemical engineer at MIT, has made a fuel-cell membrane out of layers of polymers whose electrochemical properties can be precisely tuned to prevent fuel waste. The work is described in a recent issue of Advanced Materials. Indeed, says Savinell, Hammond has solved a problem that chemists have been trying to overcome for years.
Methanol fuel cells have two compartments separated by a membrane. On one side, methanol is stripped of protons and electrons. The protons are carried through the membrane to the other compartment, where they are combined with oxygen to form water. The electrons, which can't cross the membrane, are forced into an external current that can be used to power electronic devices.
Because water is being created inside the fuel cell, the membrane is wet. Methanol, which is very soluble in water, is absorbed by conventional fuel-cell membranes and can cross over to the other side. This wastes fuel and makes the cathode, the oxidizing end of the cell, work harder. "Everyone's concerned about methanol crossover," says Merlin Bruening, a chemist at Michigan State University. Researchers have tried many different approaches to improving methanol fuel-cell membranes, but all have entailed trade-offs. "The challenge is to maintain stability and conductivity [to protons]," while decreasing methanol crossover, says Bruening.
Methanol can be efficiently produced from a wide variety of sources including still abundant fossil fuels (natural gas, coal, oil shale, tar sands, etc.), but also agricultural products and municipal waste, wood and varied biomass (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methanol_economy ).
Now, if methanol will be produced mainly from natural gas, coal, oil and tar sands, then what is new? We still add CO2 to the atmosphere and we still deplete the atmosphere of oxygen.
(A CO2 based greenhouse effect has never been proven scientifically btw, this is media hype: repeat the message over again, and we start to believe it.)
Methanol as energy form is as dubious as hydrogen as energy form, and do not have the high efficiency as electricity (efficiency = efficiency of creation, transport and usage of intermediate energy form).
Why should we replace an efficient energy infra-structure (electricity networks) by an inefficient one?
As long as academia is dominated by a few "enlightened" dictators, stupidity will be the output.
Among current conventional methods of electricity generation , the most efficientt ones are CHP (Combined Heat and Power) power plants with 20-45 percent efficiency . In addition they all should be centeralized , resulting in an average 40-50 % energy loss in the process of distributing electricity from the generation plant to the users .
Using the fuel cell technolgy , in addition to the 65-85 % efficiency for conventional PEM or SOFC fuel cells , the energy loss in the distribution process is omitted too , because of the distributed energy production by fuel cells .
The current research is , in my opinion , a boost in fuel cell technology , resolving the big "Cost" problem in addition to a greater efficiency ...
First, the energy density is stated as being similar to high end batteries, but then it is stated that they weigh less than batteries? Which one is it?
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
dmm
270 Comments
ethanol fuel cells
I'm guessing our soldiers would love for the Army to implement ethanol fuel cells. Talk about dual use!
Reply