Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Slicing Up Silicon for Cheaper Solar

A California startup is cutting by half the amount of costly silicon used in solar panels.

By Kevin Bullis

Friday, March 14, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Solaria, a startup based in Fremont, CA, intends to cut the cost of solar panels by decreasing the amount of expensive material required. It has recently started shipping its first panels to select customers. This spring the company will begin production of solar panels at a factory built to produce 25 megawatts of solar panels per year.

Stripped-down solar: By cutting silicon solar cells into strips (left) and using molded plastic (right) to funnel light to them, Solaria is able to cut the cost of its solar panels.
Credit: Solaria

Current high costs for the type of silicon used in photovoltaics have significantly driven up the price of conventional solar panels. Solaria's cells generate about 90% of a conventional solar panel's power, while using half as much silicon, says Kevin Gibson, Solaria's CTO.

Ordinarily, the silicon in a solar panel spans its surface, collecting light from as much area as possible. But Solaria slices the silicon into thin strips and spaces them apart so that they only account for about half the panel's area. A clear molded plastic cover collects light from the entire panel and funnels it to the strips of silicon.

This approach saves money because the total costs of the molded plastic, other extra materials, and added manufacturing steps still are lower than the cost of the additional silicon used in conventional solar panels. Solaria also reduces costs by using manufacturing equipment already developed for the semiconductor industry, thus avoiding expensive customized equipment. Gibson says Solaria's first products will be economical enough to compete with panels produced by much larger companies, and that successive product generations will cost between 10 and 30 percent less than their competitors.

Story continues below

Silicon prices are high now. But the element is abundant, and already new facilities are coming on-line to produce more refined silicon. For Solaria is to be competitive in the long run, it will need to implement other cost-saving measures, especially improving the overall efficiency of its solar panels, says Tonio Buonassisi, a professor of mechanical engineering at MIT.

Such improvements are possible, Gibson says. For example, in conventional solar cells, wires for collecting current are placed on top of the cell, where they block some of the incoming sunlight. Solaria could place its wires between the strips of silicon, where they block no light. Because the wires wouldn't need to be made thin to avoid blocking light, they could be sized to collect electricity more efficiently.

Comments

  • Old news .
    I guess new stories about solar must be a bit thin on the ground , maybe something to do with there not being much sun around at this time of year .

    Also isn't it amazing how much diversity of design is encouraged in the solar industry , but when it comes to wind power everyone is obsessed with horizontal axis turbines . What about vertical axis turbines , sure they have a lower thoeretical efficiency but they are still interesting and have their advantages . SRC Vertical of Russia have come up with some intersting new designs of vertical axis turbine .
    Rate this comment: 12345

    DJTal
    03/15/2008
    Posts:129
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Sliver Cells
    Sounds similar to the Sliver Cells invention. Sliver Cells use even less silicon, about 8x less or so, although the micro machining may be more expensive.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Siphon
    03/15/2008
    Posts:134
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Sliver Cells
      That's the Australian work mentioned in the story.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Kevin Bullis
      03/17/2008
      Posts:92
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: kbullis
        Thats the author of this article .
        Rate this comment: 12345

        DJTal
        03/18/2008
        Posts:129
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
        • Re: kbullis
          Ah yes, sorry I was too lazy to click through the link ;)

          The commercial development around the Sliver Cell technology has been slow. What's wrong?
          Rate this comment: 12345

          Siphon
          03/18/2008
          Posts:134
          Avg Rating:
          3/5
  • Solar Recovery
    At 12:20 PM I see 11.35 milli watts from a 1 foot square silicon solar panel. It is facing south and perficly vertical on a cloudy day. I am testing it for Unicom to see if it is practacal to power equipment in this lat. I have seen and recorded 265.21 milli watts on a sunny day last week. The load is a deep cycle boat battery 750 amp. I would need better tech to power my home.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    bexardog
    03/15/2008
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
  • [no subject]
    I installed a 4.4 kw system in may ,2002
    my rebate in california was $4.50 per watt or $18,000  plus a $3000  credit on state taxes.
    out of pocket  was $15,000. my average monthly bill $100- $125 or roughly $1500 a year.so in 10 years its paid for. actually its less time ...tiered priceing up to 30 or 40 cents per kwh .plus rate increases,projected at 12 % in 2009 at sce.
    also most new contracts will be renewables such as wind or sterling engine and the utility is allowed to recover some costs..more expensive than coal but clean.........as a result prices go up and I recover my costs at a faster rate,now I have free electricity in lets say 6 or 7 years.......
    so forget about waiting..the rebate has changed now $2.90 in ca but in texas its $ 4.50...
    now is the time............
    Rate this comment: 12345

    skipcjr
    03/16/2008
    Posts:6
    Avg Rating:
    4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Microsoft's Many Multitouch Mice
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.