Special reserve: Shown above is a rare sample of ethanol created from wood chips using a new process. So far the alcohol is made a few bottles at a time, but in a couple of years millions of gallons could be available.
Karen T. Borchers/Mercury News

Energy

Creating Ethanol from Wood More Efficiently

Bacteria in termite guts could make ethanol from noncorn sources cheaper.

  • Tuesday, February 5, 2008
  • By Kevin Bullis

A type of bacteria that helps termites digest wood could be key to making ethanol cheaply from wood and grass. ZeaChem, a startup based in Menlo Park, CA, has developed a process based on this bacteria that can produce 50 percent more ethanol from a given amount of biomass than conventional processes can.

The company has demonstrated the method in a laboratory setting and is now drawing up plans for an ethanol plant that will produce about two million gallons of ethanol a year. Construction could begin as early as this year, says Dan Verser, a founder and vice president of research and development at ZeaChem. It is one of a growing number of biofuel companies seeking to make ethanol from noncorn sources, since corn requires large amounts of land, water, and energy to grow.

The process improves yield by making more efficient use of biomass than conventional techniques do. It begins, as do other techniques for making ethanol, with breaking down biomass into sugars. At this point, conventional processes use yeast to ferment the sugars into ethanol. But this process is wasteful: about a third of the carbon in the sugars never makes it into the fuel. Instead, it's released into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide. ZeaChem replaces yeast with a type of bacteria called Moorella thermoacetica, which can be found in a number of places in nature, including termite guts and the ruminant of cows, where it helps break down grass. Instead of making ethanol and carbon dioxide, the bacteria convert sugars into a component of vinegar called acetic acid, a process that releases no carbon dioxide.

To convert acetic acid into ethanol, ZeaChem turns to chemistry. First, the company's researchers convert the acid into a common solvent called ethyl acetate--something that chemists have long known how to do. The final step--making ethanol--requires adding energy to the system in the form of hydrogen. To get the hydrogen, ZeaChem uses material left over from the process that converts biomass into sugars. This material, called lignin, can be converted into a hydrogen-rich mixture of gases by heating it up under the right conditions--a process called gasification. The hydrogen is combined with ethyl acetate to make ethanol. The remaining gases in the mixture are fed back into the process to provide the energy needed for gasification, making use of material that otherwise would have gone to waste and eliminating the need to use fossil fuels. So far, the company has shown more than 40 percent better yield compared with conventional approaches, and it's working toward a theoretically possible improvement of 50 percent.

Advertisement

"It's a very innovative process," says James McMillan, a research scientist and group manager at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, in Golden, CO. He says that it's important to get as much ethanol from the feedstock as possible, since the final cost of ethanol depends heavily on the cost of feedstock. Although ZeaChem's process is more complicated than methods used now, and building ethanol plants that use it will cost more, McMillan says that the improved yield could make up for these increased costs.

More in Energy

Cheap Hydrogen

Read More »
Print

Related Articles

The Price of Biofuels

Making ethanol from corn is expensive. Better biofuels are years away from the gas tank. Farmers are reluctant to change their practices. But do we really have any alternative to biofuels?

Termite Guts Could Boost Ethanol Efficiency

A metagenomic study could suggest ways to make cellulosic ethanol.

Why Termite Guts Could Bring Better Biofuels

Sequencing the genomes of microbial ecosystems could lead to better biological machines.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

DJTal

154 Comments

  • 1471 Days Ago
  • 02/05/2008

A bit deceptive.

There's no reason to think , yet , that ethanol produced by this method is more efficient and cheaper . Ethanol could be produced via the normal bacterial route and then the remaining lignin used to generate electricty . It's a bit deceptive to suggest it's cheaper and more efficient just because the lignin is being used to make the ethanol .

Reply

AirCarGUy

2 Comments

  • 1471 Days Ago
  • 02/05/2008

Re: A bit deceptive.

Exactly. A new method is cool, but A) What are the caloric values of the inputs, and much more important, B) What are the waste products? Cattle feed or PrestoLogs? or some utterly unmanageable sludge like "it is revealed that this same Weyerhaeuser sludge contains dioxins." C) What contiminates are the result of its burning? ( You are all familuar with the smell of brandy burning off of food no? What about the other end of the spectum?

Reply

Siphon

152 Comments

  • 1467 Days Ago
  • 02/09/2008

Re: A bit deceptive.

If they're going to be using a gasifier, then why not gasify all the biomass in the first place and turn the syngas into methanol? Should be even more efficient then what they're proposing here and certainly less complicated. Also, if memory serves, a gasifier should destroy all dioxins right?

Reply

GTChE

1 Comment

  • 1308 Days Ago
  • 07/17/2008

Re: A bit deceptive.

To gasify all the biomass, albeit simplier, would be more energy intensive.  Range Fuels is taking your suggested approach, so it will be interesting to compare Zeachem's demonstration plan with Range Fuels modular commercial scale plant under construction in Georgia. 
As I understand Zeachem's process, they are purifying the product at the ethyl acetate step using liquid-liquid extraction, which should prove to be much more energy effient than distilling the water rich ethanol stream produced by traditional fermentation.

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

SpaceX

American Superconductor

Lattice Power

PrimeSense

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement