Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

The New CAFE Standards

Fuel standards will likely be achievable but won't encourage innovation.

By Peter Fairley

Tuesday, January 15, 2008

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

The 40 percent increase in the U.S. fuel-economy standard to 35 miles per gallon by 2020, which Congress passed last month, could be a significant step toward trimming U.S. drivers' increasing greenhouse-gas emissions and dependence on imported oil. But energy experts say that the new technologies required to meet the new standards are minimal. Instead, they say that lesser-known provisions in the Energy Independence and Security Act could have a far greater impact on spurring the development of new technologies, such as plug-in electric vehicles.

Small changes: New fuel-economy standards won’t drive plug-in electric vehicles, such as this three-door hatchback from ZENN Motor Company, into the market. But lower-profile R&D incentives and manufacturing supports in the same legislation could jump-start the process.
Credit: Electric Drive Transportation Association

The new law tightens Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards that regulate the average fuel economy in the vehicles produced by each major automaker. The current CAFE standard for cars, set in 1984, requires manufacturers to achieve an average of 27.5 miles per gallon, while a second CAFE standard requires an average of 22.2 miles per gallon for light trucks such as minivans, sport utility vehicles, and pickups. The new rules require that these standards be increased such that, by 2020, the new cars and light trucks sold each year deliver a combined fleet average of 35 miles per gallon.

Raising fuel economy by 10 miles per gallon nationwide will deliver real benefits. The Union of Concerned Scientists, for example, estimates that it will save 1.1 million barrels of oil per day in 2020--about half of what the United States imports from the Persian Gulf. That should deliver a reduction in greenhouse gases equivalent to taking 28 million of today's cars and trucks off the road. Nevertheless, Jim Kliesch, a senior engineer with the Union of Concerned Scientists, in Washington, DC, projects that these savings will be largely negated in 2020 by increased driving.

"Fuel-economy policy in this country had been stagnating for decades, and getting a minimum of 35 mpg by 2020 is a critical first step, but if we want to achieve a sustainable transportation system, it's going to take much more," says Kliesch.

Story continues below

Analysts like Kliesch do expect automakers to produce more advanced diesel vehicles and hybrids in the coming decade, both in response to tightening fuel-economy rules and for strategic and marketing reasons. But reports by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, think tanks, and activists show that a combination of existing efficiency options, such as continuously variable transmissions and better tires, can cheaply and easily deliver a 35-miles-per-gallon fleet. (See "Why Not a 40-MPG SUV?")

Indeed, Europe currently requires 40 miles per gallon average fuel economy and will soon push up to 49 miles per gallon, while Japan is expected to reach 47 miles per gallon in its 2015 standard. Greenhouse-gas regulations developed by California (and adopted by many other states) may soon eclipse CAFE in the United States. Last month, the Environmental Protection Agency rejected California's petition to impose its own standards, arguing that the state rules delivered the equivalent of just 33.5 miles per gallon, but California officials shot back with their own analysis early this month. They estimated that the state standard would yield 35 miles per gallon from new cars by about 2016--four years ahead of CAFE.

Comments

  • New Cafe Standards
    This whole deal is a BAD joke. There is so much currently usable technology that the auto manufacturers could double the mileage figures on every model they have by next year without breaking a sweat. The technology has been available for the past 30+ years to have the typical passenger car to be capable not only of double to triple the current MPG figures but also to have better performance.
    The only way they get away with the BS that is being dished out is because the general public is so ignorant of any and all technology advances that actually have and are being made.
    http://www.3wheelers.com/fuelva.html
    http://www.fev-now.com/index.php?page=xr3_hybrid
    http://www.valentintechnologies.com/concept/default.asp
    Rate this comment: 12345

    olmon
    01/15/2008
    Posts:16
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: New Cafe Standards
      So true! In fact, we don't even need to deploy any new technology to achieve these fuel standards. If Europe has a 40 mpg fuel standard today, as the article says, then all we have to do is build cars to the European standards. Mind you, these car companies are global, so they have the know-how, the licenses, everything they need to increase fuel efficiency now. But they just simply don't want to improve the fuel economy. They are so utterly disgusting. They opposed even the current increase in efficiency.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      gabrielg01
      01/15/2008
      Posts:400
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • NON imported oil? Nope.
        It's even worse than what the preceding comments convey. The trap is in this phrase in the article's very first sentence: '...a significant step toward trimming U.S. drivers' increasing greenhouse-gas emissions and dependence on imported oil.'

        Nunnh-unnh. Won't be like that. QUADRUPLING fuel economy won't do it. Because? The supply of NON-imported oil is DECREASING. The US passed 'peak' in petroleum development -- oh -- way back in 1970 or so.

        All of this is nutz.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        lkrndu
        01/15/2008
        Posts:23
        Avg Rating:
        2/5
        • Re: NON imported oil? Nope.
          US has 800 billion barrels of recoverable, high quality shale oil in the Rockies that would cost about $20-30/barrel to recover with thermal in-situ, CO2 injection technology per the Rand Institute 2005 Study.  What we lack is the political will.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          RD
          01/15/2008
          Posts:114
          Avg Rating:
          3/5
          • Re: NON imported oil? Nope.
            Shale oil in the Green River formation will be developed. It's coming. See http://money.cnn.com/2007/10/30/magazines/fortune/Oil_from_stone.fortune/index.htm for some background.
            Rate this comment: 12345

            ChuckInReno
            01/16/2008
            Posts:19
            Avg Rating:
            3/5
        • Re: NON imported oil? Nope.
          Oil is a globally priced commodity, so to reduce the price in the US you really must decrease the price globally. You won't do this by making people drive tiny 50 mpg cars. Not with the Chinese and Indian economies growing the way they are.
          The answer is to find more oil and stabilize the value of the dollar.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          nibbircii
          01/16/2008
          Posts:2
          Avg Rating:
          2/5
      • Re: New Cafe Standards
        Remember, politicians do not "create" anything. All they can really do is throw our money at something and hope it causes the desired change.  But public laws do not change the natural laws of supply and demand.  Other posters are right in that increasing CAFE does not solve the basic problem; at best it just delays (or extends, depending upon your point of view) the pain a bit.  The transition to a non oil based economy will happen. The only remaining question is whether it will be a smooth one, or a messy one.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        ricke8592
        01/15/2008
        Posts:3
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
    • Re: New Cafe Standards
      The cars of the 70s: Datsun, Toyota, Dodge had the omni, Fiat, Volkswagon...all got good milage. I had a 68 Opal that got 35mpg city driving! The technology IS here and Nixon forced them to use it, Bush won't because he and his buddies haven't made enough money yet. Why did they offer the farm equipment replacement tax credits to the general public to buy oversized vehicles?

      In the last decade this NASCAR/redneck mentality has created a society of bigger, bigger, bigger. Why do all our vehicles have to look like they're on steroids or peddle cars?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      azwaverider
      04/21/2008
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
    • Re: New Cafe Standards
      Green Eco Tek LLC.

      570 Central Ave. Bldg. G

      Lake Elsinore California 92530



      Subject: Café Standards

      Date: 1-27-2008

      Dear President Obama,

      Congratulations on becoming President.  Your press secretary discussed the CAFE standards at this week at a press conference:

      "The actions that the President took today put us on the path when we realize a fuel efficiency standard of 35 miles to the gallon -- it's 27.5 now -- 35 miles to the gallon will constitute a savings of 2 million barrels of oil a day, which is roughly comparable to the amount of oil that we import each day from the Persian Gulf."

      Your press secretary further stated:

          "I think what ultimately we'll come up with is something that moves along the twin goals of ensuring a strong manufacturing sector while at the same time ensuring that we take the necessary steps to reduce our dependence on foreign oil."

      We agree with you. We have a solution that will make this a reality today and we will not have to wait until 2011 to breathe clean air or reduce our fuel costs. Our patented bio-friendly fuel additive Omstar D-1280X has been extensively tested by CARB and EPA- accredited labs over the last 22 years. Omstar D-1280X is compatible with all fuels and can reduce fuel consumption by 22% on average while also reducing emissions across the board by 52% (GHG reductions between 6-8 percent) for all vehicles. LAX Shuttle Service tested D-1280X for 4 years, and 8,000,000 miles, showing an 89% reduction in smoke opacity (PM), and 15% increase in Mpg. The Port of LA tested D-1280X on a ship from APL. The results showed a substantial decrease in stack emissions (ash), shorter engine recovery time (74% faster, meaning more usable horsepower), reduced engine heat (46%), and 63% reduction in smoke opacity. APL had got an award for their clean air initiatives from the City of Los Angeles. The US Marine Corps tested D-1280X on heavy diesel support fleet, showing a 77% reduction in black smoke, and a 69% increase in Mpg. South Coast AQMD & E.W Saybolt, tested D-1280X, and showed that it is 99.99976% ashless upon combustion, and free from toxic residues and metals.

      Let not stop with vehicles and use Omstar D-1280X for motorcycles, off-road vehicles, trains, construction equipment, ships and airplanes as well. Our additive should be mandatory in all fuel used in the USA. Saving $150,000,000,000.00 in oil imports is 20% of our yearly consumption and we can achieve that by simply putting Omstar D-1280X in the fuel. The money saved can be spent on renewable energy investments, such as wind, and solar. Our education system is suffering with several budget cuts and layoffs. Not to mention avoiding passing this high foreign- oil bill and vehicle R&D bill to the taxpayer.

      The Big Three automakers are in trouble and can ill afford this financial burden alone, and do not need to re-invent the automobile as we know it, when cheaper, more effective, simple and immediate solution like D-1280X exists now, with an ROI for the government.  While the oil companies might disagree, reformulating the fuel (hopefully with our additive) is a vital part of the solution. Do not let the oil companies stop us!  We have waited 22 years to be heard and would like your support in achieving our objective to reduce our foreign dependence on oil while also reducing our emissions and costs. Thank you.


      Sincerely,

      Sean McDonald

      President

      Phone: (951) 259-5169

      www.greenecotek.com
      Rate this comment: 12345

      greenecotek
      02/02/2009
      Posts:1
  • Reduce octane to increase gas supply
    The ultimate goal is to use less oil, which doesn't always translate into higher CAFE standards. If all oil companies reduced the octane rating of their finest premiums from 93 to 92, it would increase the nation's gasoline production efficiency by roughly 2 percent—or, in laymen's terms, it would enable us to squeeze another 182,000 barrels of usable gasoline out of our crude oil supply each day. Over a full year, the reduction would save us about 143.1 million barrels of oil annually—enough to satisfy our national oil demand for about seven days. How about having all cars designed to run on 87 octane and eliminate the higher octanes?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    RD
    01/15/2008
    Posts:114
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • America fails again .
    For a country and president that supposedly believes in technological solutions to the problem of global warming this legislation is an abismal failure to act . In a country where people regularly drive long distances , why would any american motorists mind having vehicles with the very best miles per gallon , or does the government WANT people to consume more fuel .
    Rate this comment: 12345

    DJTal
    01/17/2008
    Posts:130
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • As for drilling for new oil...
    Not to get political, but the mistake currently occupying the White House did make one correct statement:  We are addicted to oil.  Drilling for new oil is like a drug addict dumping his present supplier and finding another.  Nothing gets solved.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    lasertekk
    01/23/2008
    Posts:77
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Bigger Problems than Cars
    More than half of the oil used worldwide is for non-transportation purposes, such as plastics and other raw materials.  Look around where you are currently sitting and see if there is anything near you that isn't made out of a petroleum derivative.  There won't be much - even the varnish on the wooden bookshelves probably use oil.  Anyway, focusing on CAFE standards while ignoring everything else will not solve the imported oil issue.  I believe it was a Saudi prince who once said something along the lines of "it's okay if you stop using gas for your cars, we are more than happy to sell you the raw materials for all of your products."
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Bruce in CO
    02/01/2008
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    1/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Making 3D Maps on the Move
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.