Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Improving Fuel Cells for Cars

A new method for making ultrathin materials could lead to better fuel cells.

By Kevin Bullis

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

A new method for making materials just a few atoms thick could pave the way to automotive fuel cells that use readily available fuels instead of hydrogen, which is difficult to produce and store. The new fuel cells would be smaller, lower-temperature versions of solid-oxide fuel cells (SOFCs), which were originally developed for use in stationary applications such as power plants. Startup Sienergy Systems, based in Quincy, MA, was founded to bring the fuel cells to market. Last week the company announced half a million dollars in early-stage funding.

Electron barrier: An electron-microscope image of yttria-stabilized zirconia, a common electrolyte material for solid-oxide fuel cells. This sample, which shows good crystalline structure, was made through a new method that produces high-quality, extremely thin electrolyte films.
Credit: Shriram Ramanathan

The synthesis method, developed by Harvard professor of materials science Shriram Ramanathan, produces high-quality solid-oxide electrolytes that are about 25 nanometers thick--about a thousandth the thickness of the electrolytes used in conventional SOFCs. The thinner electrolyte allows the fuel cells to run at about 300 ºC--much cooler than the 800 to 1,000 degrees typical for SOFCs. The lower temperatures could lead to lower costs and make it much easier to package the fuel cells for use in vehicles and portable generators.

Several major automakers are developing fuel cells, but they're proton-exchange-membrane fuel cells that can run only on hydrogen, says Harry Tuller, a professor of ceramics and electronic materials at MIT who is also developing lower-temperature SOFCs. Hydrogen has a number of drawbacks. It must be derived from sources such as natural gas or water, a process that consumes energy and typically releases carbon dioxide. What's more, it's a diffuse gas that's difficult to store, and there isn't an extensive infrastructure for delivering it.

Solid-oxide fuel cells could offer a better alternative. They can run on hydrogen but also on natural gas, diesel, and other liquid fuels. Running directly on natural gas cuts out the energy-wasting middle steps of producing and compressing hydrogen for distribution and storage.

The main problem with solid-oxide fuel cells has been that they operate at extremely high temperatures that require expensive materials, make startup times slow, and make the cells difficult to package for portable applications. That has led a growing number of researchers worldwide to investigate ways to lower operating temperatures. Some, such as Tuller and Fritz Prinz, a mechanical-engineering and materials-science professor at Stanford University, have demonstrated prototype SOFCs that operate at only a few hundred ºC. An MIT spinoff called Lilliputian Systems is also developing SOFCs for portable applications, although it's not clear whether the company has produced a low-temperature cell. Ramanathan, who has also demonstrated basic fuel cells that operate between 300 and 500 degrees, hopes that his method for synthesizing oxides could lead to cells that work well at temperatures as low as 200 degrees.

The best thing about Ramanathan's method may be that it works at room temperature. Typically, making oxides with the sort of crystal structure that yields high performance also requires high temperatures. Ramanathan's method essentially uses the energy in ultraviolet photons to replace thermal energy: the ultraviolet light creates oxygen radicals that react with metals to form oxides. The low operating temperature permits better control over the material's structure and can improve the interfaces between layers in a fuel cell, such as the junction where the electrolyte meets electrodes, says Evgeni Gusev, director of research and development at Qualcomm MEMS, in San Jose, CA. "Usually you have to apply high temperatures," he says, "which create a lot of damage."

Story continues below

That damage can include the interpenetration of neighboring materials, whose electronic properties change as a consequence. Contaminants at interfaces can also make a big difference, Tuller says. In his work, he has shown that good interfaces can make fuel-cell performance a thousand times better.

So far, Ramanathan has assembled only rudimentary fuel cells to demonstrate the feasibility of his methods. Over the next year, he will develop prototypes made of stacks of fuel cells, which will be able to produce more power. Having demonstrated that he can make high-quality electrolytes, he's now focusing on using his technique to make high-quality oxides for electrode materials. Another challenge, for Ramanathan as well as for other researchers, is combining improved materials into a complete package that produces large enough amounts of power.

Comments

  • Weak writing ...
    The author here described previous generation fuel cells as follows: "Hydrogen has a number of drawbacks. It must be derived from sources such as natural gas or water, a process that consumes energy and typically releases carbon dioxide."  While derivation from natural gas may produce CO2, derivation from water certainly does not (unless one is foolish enough to burn petro-based fuels to generate the electricity to run the process) -- the implication here that both are bad is unforgivable pandering to the HI/GW crowd. 

    Two sentences later the author proclaims that SOHC's are better because "They can run on hydrogen but also on natural gas, diesel, and other liquid fuels".  While allowing H2 to recombine with O2 can be CO2 free, I am at a loss to understand why the use of "natural gas, diesel, and other [petro-based] fuels" is an improvement relative to the argument concerning the release of CO2 as a by-product.  The other positive aspects of low temperature SOHC's seems quite promising, but the CO2 argument is way off base.  I expect better writing from TR: less pandering, more technology ...
    Rate this comment: 12345

    dcbeethe
    11/14/2007
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Free writing...
      Those are minor quibbles. They don't change the basic point of the article. I read this forum for free so I appreciate everything they write.

      Thank you from me to offset the criticism. I'd like to see more energy articles from TR.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      asdar
      11/14/2007
      Posts:69
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: Free writing...
        I agree.  Its frustrating how negative and ungrateful people can be towards others at times.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        pratekya
        11/14/2007
        Posts:4
        Avg Rating:
        2/5
    • Re: Weak writing ...
      You are right, but no need to be to harsh.
      As for the cells been cleaner even if they use carbon based fuels, I supose that could be justified if one account for the fact that vehicles running on this system can have much fewer CO2 emissions in comparison with internal explosion engines due to an increase in energy eficiency.
      To mi CO2 emissions is not a concern despite the current fashion and propaganda about it, energy eficiency is for geopolitical reasons. Although it is early days still, this could eventualy help.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      ingocar
      11/18/2007
      Posts:2
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • making materials just a few atoms thick
    Is this "new method" for making materials just a few atoms thick going to be more widely applicable?

    As great as it may be for SOFC, is this method limited to that arena / those materials?  Isn't the ability to create ultra thin coatings widely desired / needed?

    What's the technique and what are the parameters for the coating materials and substrates?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    nekote
    11/14/2007
    Posts:138
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: making materials just a few atoms thick
      you're right,
      they don't specify the technique. If I had to guess, it seems like he's not using a "brand new" technique. Instead, I get the idea he's just the first to apply material-growth (as opposed to material-manufacture) techniques to the solid oxide electrolytes.

      So when you ask if this is applicable to other areas, the answer is: sort of. Yes it is, but this isn't the breakthru, just an application of the breakthru if I understand it correctly.

      However, this does not come thru clearly in the article and it would be nice if the writing was more specific.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      cripdyke
      11/15/2007
      Posts:17
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • estimated efficiency?
    It is a shame that none of the researchers go out on a limb and estimate the possible efficiency of a low-temperature SOFC.  High-temperature SOFCs are actually quite efficient (50-60%), but will that carry over to their low-temperature cousins?  I think it matters a great deal, because today, if one had a great source of hydrogen, it would be more efficient to turn it into electricity, ship it over the grid, charge a vehicle battery, and drive off of that energy than it would be to ship the hydrogen, fill a vehicle tank, and then turn it into electricity in the vehicle.  One of the primary reasons for this is the relatively high ratio of efficiency between stationary and mobile fuel cells.  A SOFC or MCFC followed by a steam turbine (that takes advantage of the high-temperature of the fuel cell) is projected to reach 70-80% efficiency conversion of hydrogen into electricity.  Mobile fuel cells (i.e. PEMs) are less than half of this, and that factor of two makes a big difference.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    killian
    11/26/2007
    Posts:70
    Avg Rating:
    4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Making 3D Maps on the Move
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.