The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
Sweet harvest: Sugarcane is the basis of the Brazilian ethanol boom. In the United States, most ethanol is still made from corn.
Xenïa Antunes
Brazilian researchers report that exposure to magnetic fields increased ethanol yields by as much as 17 percent.
Brazil gets a third of its fuel from sugarcane-based ethanol, and ethanol producers want to increase that figure by refining the fermentation process. Brazilian labs are exploring everything from the genetic engineering of yeast to new approaches to producing ethanol from agricultural waste. In research to be published next month in the American Chemical Society journal Biotechnology Progress, Brazilian researchers claim to have demonstrated a seemingly unlikely means to higher yields: magnetic fields.
The researchers at the University of Campinas, in Brazil, say that they boosted ethanol yield 17 percent and shaved two hours off of a 15-hour fermentation process simply by circulating the fermentation brew past six magnets, each about the size of an overstuffed wallet. "The fermentation time can be reduced, and consequently, the production cost can also be reduced," says Victor Haber Perez, the University of Campinas food engineer who led the research team.
A slew of recent reports highlight the importance of cutting the cost of biofuel production and boosting yields. Earlier this month, for example, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development warned that biofuels--as currently produced--will inflate food prices and are a relatively costly way to reduce petroleum imports and carbon-dioxide emissions. (See "The High Costs of Biofuels.")
Looking to magnets for help isn't as crazy as it sounds. In fact, magnetic-field effects on microbial and mammalian cells are well documented. Biologists now view magnetic-field "pollution" from mobile-phone towers as a likely cause of a decline in the population of some migratory birds that rely on magnetic fields for navigation. And genetic engineers are experimenting with magnetic fields as a tool to control the growth and differentiation of stem cells. However, magnetically enhanced fermentation is a more controversial idea. There have been relatively few studies of magnetic effects on yeast cells--particularly the yeast cells employed in fermentation--and the results have been contradictory.
In 2003, Brazilian researchers at the Federal University of Pernambuco, in Recife, created a stir with a report that a static magnetic field caused marked increases in the growth of yeast and the ethanol concentration in laboratory-scale fermentations that used Saccharomyces cerevisiae. (S. cerevisiae is the yeast most commonly used in the Brazilian biofuels industry to produce ethanol from sugarcane.) A year later, however, Spanish radiobiologists at the University of Malaga threw that work into doubt, reporting that they had observed no stimulation of S. cerevisiae when it was subjected to a (much weaker, admittedly) magnetic field. They also failed to observe any impact from the alternating magnetic fields used in some earlier studies.
Perez and his colleagues set out to settle the matter, using controlled experiments in a state-of-the-art industrial bioreactor. They diverted the fermentation mixture of sugarcane molasses and yeast out of the reactor via stainless-steel pipes that passed between six magnets with a combined field strength of 20 milliteslas--roughly halfway between the strengths of the magnets employed in previous tests. The results confirmed the 2003 report from the group in Recife: a static magnetic field increased the yeast's rate of sugar metabolism and boosted ethanol production by 9 percent. The higher 17 percent increase was observed when Perez employed a solenoid--basically, a wire coil around the magnets--to alternate the 20-millitesla field.
This report, and, in deed, the experimental
details raises very serious controversies.
The scientific mechanism of action supporting
the claimed ethanol increase has not been
provided to afford fair comment(s)and methodology
appreciation.
Known knowledge indicates that exposure of live cells to either, electric or magnetic flux
density produces adverse effect on shelf life and survival of bioreactants, concentration of reactants, bioactivity, ambient temperature and pressure etc.
Role play of magnetic field to the culture must
be explained, as the cited increase bears no
correlation to, either, mechanical or electrical
modification of bioreactors. (contact: martin@mpgatechnology.com)
everyone knows that electromagnetic radiation is a stimulant to growth of cells, especially plant cells. this is no surprise...in fact it's been long since tested and documented.
grow some plants in a cup, subject them to electromagnetic radiation, set up a control and see for yourself.
You mean... light? Yeah, I'll agree with you that light is "electromagnetic radiation". LOL!!! ^_^'
Quite unbelievable actually... probably that explains the nature of some of those responses. Now I know, it's not our job to sit and weave theories while someone else is slogging behind the actual research, but I've been thinking... Can it have anything to do with ionic transfer across the cell membrane? That's the first thing that springs up when one thinks of magnetic fields. Are there any other documented effects of magnetic fields on cellular activity?
AZ Industries, Inc. http://www.azind.com/ has, for over twenty years, sold magnetic water and fuel treatment devices that have numerous endorsements and patent protection for their efficacy in improving performance, mileage, and reduction of salt buildup (water treatment). Email: azind@centurytel.net . In fact, their founder, Les Adam, was a speaker at the first IRI Conference on Future Energy in 1999 on "Magnet Power" and his video is still available from www.lightworksav.com .
Another company that offers similar products is The Magnetizer Group http://www.magnetizer.net/index2.htm which has water and fuel magnetic energizers. Therefore, the Brazilian discovery is not new. However, the US Patent Office still considers this magnetic treatment of fuel to be unscientific, for unknown reasons (ref. MPEP online).
Crystal energy is a colloidal mineral product created by US scientist Patrick Flanagan , which has the ability to catalyse the function of water , ie. lower the surface tension , increase fluidity and increase the solvent power of the water . In his investigations whilst creating this product he studied the effects of magnets , amongst other things , on the physical properties of water . He says that magnets do affect the water's properties but the effects diminish over time . As a result of these studies he created the colloidal mineral product which permanently affects the water properties . It may well be that the magnets are are affecting the water in the fermentation reaction , rather than just the living organisms , thereby catalyzing all of the reactions taking place in the vessel making the reactions take place more efficiently . To find out more visit www.phisciences.com , the official Flanagan website . I've tried this product out on plant growth and it increases plant growth , although it is being sold as a nutritional supplement for humans it seems to have a wide variety of other uses .
Hmm. Are people just suspicious because it involves magnets?
I mean, I understand that reaction... I find myself disinclined to believe anything involving magnets as a fix, due to their use in a vast number of free-energy schemes, miracle cures and other quackery. But the effects of magnetic fields on living cells are just beginning to be understood in any depth... So I wonder if that's causing people to unduly snub this report. It's not necessarily hogwash.
Re: Hmm. Are people just suspicious because it involves magnets?
i agree with you monster . people seem to forget that magnets are a source of ENERGY , which does have an EFFECT on things . maybe other sources of energy like ionising radiation would have a beneficial effect . ionised air is good for people to breath........ maybe...........?
Is it possible to get the links of the references you have used especially the links of the corresponding research paper. Thanks
I played with words to explain a simple matter. Yes, improvement is a reality in any field. The will to create, introduce and implement a more radical approach will face the giant magnets from politics and lobbies groups.
Albert Roy Davis and Walter C. Rawls were the first to discover that the North and South poles of magnetism are two separate energies with different effects on all matter. The North pole spins counterclockwise, contracts matter, and slows biological growth. The South pole spins clockwise, expands matter, and increases biological growth.
They developed a technology called Biomagnetic Bioremediation that utilizes unipolar magnetic fields (South pole) to stimulate the growth of microbes in the bioremediation process. This invention can clean up toxic waste better than any other known method and it has been successfully tested by the EPA.
Davis and Rawls discovered that water was affected differently depending on which magnetic pole it was exposed to. They also found that plant growth could be increased by placing seeds on the North or South pole of a magnet for a few days just prior to planting them, and watering the plants with magnetized water. Depending on the species of plant, most grow best with South pole exposure, but some respond best to the North pole. All of the information from the Magnetizer website came from the discoveries of Davis and Rawls.
These two scientists found that fermentation could be sped up by using South pole magnetic fields too.
In their books they state that they have not found any field of human inquiry that these discoveries cannot be applied to.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
walt
66 Comments
hogwash
Yes, it has been demonstrated: this newsletter will publish anything.
Reply
devassocx
111 Comments
Re: hogwash
I sure don't know about the specific claims made in the article but magnetism can certainly have effects on living things...I think you can find some interesting work done some time ago in a book by
Becker, titled "the Body Electric". Its a lay book
but the guy (a PHD) was an FDA researcher and he
describes some of their experiments.
Reply
amulekii
10 Comments
Re: hogwash
Sounds like Horse Puckey to me. Read the research you say? I'll read research that sounds reasonable. This sounds like nonsense.
Reply
g8oz
1 Comment
Re: hogwash
Agreed. For one, how much of the increase was due simply to the circulation of the fermenting fluid?
Reply
michaelebradley
1 Comment
Re: hogwash
Your question can be answered by a direct quote from the paper: "The control experiment was accomplished by maintaining the the recycling loop during all fermentation processes but without the application of the magnetic field."
Reply
bvink1
1 Comment
Re: hogwash
Actually, the company I work with in Brazil has been producing electromagnetic collars for over 15 years for the ethanol industry along with sulfur free sugar bleaching. This technology is well documented and produces fantastic results. With our technology we are able to sterilize the must (without chemicals) eliminate antibiotics reducing bactericides and yeast. We also obtain an extra 14 liters per ton of syrup as well as increase the efficiency of fermentation by 0.5%. Other benefits include regulation of the pH, better brix, conductivity, etc. If you would like more detailed and technical info, please feel free to email me at bruce@gasilusa.com
Reply