Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Practical Fuel Cells for Electronics

Continued from page 1

By Kevin Bullis

Monday, August 27, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

A number of research groups at companies and in academic and government labs have developed components for fuel cells that could soon be ready to incorporate into products, although Holladay doesn't expect to see them on the market for at least another two years. (See "Better Fuel Cells for Laptops.") There are still issues to be resolved with the hydrogen fuel cells. For example, such fuel cells produce water as they make electricity, and finding a way to get rid of that water without affecting the surrounding electronics in a laptop is a challenge, he says. What's more, the fuel cells are still expensive. If a fuel-cell system costs three or four times more than a battery, Holladay asks, why not just buy extra batteries for long trips?

And many experts believe that fuel cells will never appear widely in consumer electronics. They doubt that regulators, for instance, will allow passengers to bring flammable liquids on an airplane, even in small amounts and carefully packaged inside the system.

Still, advocates of the technology point to numerous practical applications. Emergency workers with powerful 20-watt radios need energy sources that can work for days or weeks on end without ready access to grid electricity. (See "Printing Fuel Cells.") The military could also be a major customer, using the technology replace batteries.

Comments

  • It could be applied (also) to swappable electric cars' batteries >>>
    .

    this new idea could be applied (also) to swappable electric cars' batteries:

    http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/033cellphoneCAR.html

    thanks to its 6x power vs. LiIon cars batteries, the new cars could have (both) lighter batteries AND a longer autonomy (maybe, up to 300 miles)

    and the "swappable battries" solve the main problem of all electric cars: the (now) very long (4+ hours) recharge time

    .
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Gaetano Mara...
    08/27/2007
    Posts:114
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: It could be applied (also) to swappable electric cars' batteries >>>
      The issue with using this in cars is you're just swapping one liquid-fueled technology (gasoline) for another (methanol). You still can't use the home-delivered power grid for recharging, one of the main selling points for electric cars. Electric energy is cheap. With this, you're still dependent on going to some energy supply depot (gas station or battery swap station) that has to be widely available.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      SVE
      08/27/2007
      Posts:48
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • you're right on this point, but...
        .

        you're right on this point and about the home recharge, but, if these new cells will be "sealed" the only way to "refuel" a car in long trips is to "swap" them "somewhere" (gas stations, Wal-Mart, etc.) while, if that cells can be refueled with methane, it's a NON SENSE to use a (very expensive) fuel cell and a (low performance) electric motor, instead of (simply) modify a gasoline car to work with methane!

        however, I agree with you that rechargeable batteries are (and will always be) better, simpler, SAFER (since they have no explosive LH2 or methane) and several/dozens times cheaper than ANY kind of fuel cell

        and, about "safety"... recently many notebooks has gone on fire due to defective Li-Ion batteries... well, how much "safe" a notebook with a methane+hydrogen fuel cell will be? ...could that kind of notebooks fly with their owners/passengers on common airlines and trains? ...etc.

        .
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Gaetano Mara...
        08/27/2007
        Posts:114
        Avg Rating:
        2/5
        • Re: you're right on this point, but...
          1. It's not using the gas, methane (CH4), it's using the liquid, methanol (CH3OH).

          2. You have it backwards. Electric motors are by no means inefficient. They can be up to 90% efficient. Compare this with 20% for an internal combustion engine running on any kind of fuel.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          zed2
          08/27/2007
          Posts:1
  • apples and oranges
    Let's stop comparing apples to oranges when it comes to the ability of fuel cells to supply the sustained demands of radically different energy requirements.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    phoenix
    08/27/2007
    Posts:172
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: apples and oranges
      Fuelcell discussions invariably wander into applications with radically different energy requirements. The reason is that everytime someone suggests any particular application for FCs, it gets shot down as a stupid approach compared to what's already available. That's the FC problem in a nutshell. There's basically no application for which it is the best solution.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      SVE
      08/27/2007
      Posts:48
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • that's true
        .

        SVE said "There's basically no application for which it is the best solution."

        that's true, since the fuel cells will be no more used also in the field where they was the absolute winner for 40+ years: "spaceships"

        infact, the new NASA Orion will use solar arrays and rechargeable batteries

        .
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Gaetano Mara...
        08/27/2007
        Posts:114
        Avg Rating:
        2/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.