Souped-up silicon: A micrograph of a seven-nanometer chunk of crystalline silicon, called a nanocrystal or quantum dot. Such structures could dramatically increase the efficiency of solar cells.
Arthur Nozik, National Renewable Energy Laboratory

Energy

Silicon Nanocrystals for Superefficient Solar Cells

Research shows that silicon can wring two electrons from each photon of incoming light.

  • Wednesday, August 15, 2007
  • By Kevin Bullis

A typical solar cell generates only one electron per photon of incoming sunlight. Some exotic materials are thought to produce multiple electrons per photon, but for the first time, the same effect has been seen in silicon. Researchers at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), in Golden, CO, showed that silicon nanocrystals can produce two or three electrons per photon of high-energy sunlight. The effect, they say, could lead to a new type of solar cell that is both cheap and more than twice as efficient as today's typical photovoltaics.

As in earlier work with other materials, the extra electrons come from photons of blue and ultraviolet light, which have much more energy than those from the rest of the solar spectrum, especially red and infrared light. In most solar cells, the extra energy in blue and ultraviolet light is wasted as heat. But the small size of nanoscale crystals, also called quantum dots, leads to novel quantum-mechanical effects that convert this energy into electrons instead.

By generating multiple electrons from high-energy photons, solar cells made of silicon nanocrystals could theoretically convert more than 40 percent of the energy in light into electrical power, says Arthur Nozik, a senior research fellow at NREL. In contrast, today's flat rooftop solar panels are at best just over 20 percent efficient and are theoretically limited to about 30 percent efficiency. Concentrating sunlight with mirrors or lenses could raise that figure to about 40 percent, but the same approach could boost the efficiency of a silicon-nanocrystal solar cell to well over 60 percent, Nozik says.

What's more, solar cells made of silicon nanocrystals could prove to be cheap, giving them a significant advantage over other approaches to high-efficiency solar cells. For example, advanced "multijunction" cells have shown efficiencies of more than 40 percent. But these require complicated manufacturing processes that combine expensive semiconductors optimized for different parts of the solar spectrum. Silicon nanocrystals, in contrast, are relatively easy to make, even compared with the material in conventional solar cells, the best of which are made of very large, single crystals of silicon.

Advertisement

Silicon nanocrystals also have marked advantages over the other nanocrystal materials that have shown the multielectron effect. Some of these materials contain toxic elements such as lead or cadmium, and others rely on elements such as indium that are in limited supply. But silicon is both safe and abundant. It's also well studied, says Christiana Honsberg, professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Delaware, so engineers know how to work with it to make solar cells. Indeed, for many of the same reasons, silicon is by far the most common material in solar cells today, and it's attractive as the basis for broader deployment of photovoltaics in the future.

Print

Related Articles

Waves of Electrons

Surface plasmons could improve solar cells and wireless devices.

TR10: Nanocharging Solar

Arthur Nozik believes quantum-dot solar power could boost output in cheap photovoltaics.

Cheap, Superefficient Solar

Solar-power modules that concentrate the power of the sun are becoming more viable.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Siphon

152 Comments

  • 1639 Days Ago
  • 08/21/2007

Synergy

Wouldn't this be great to combine with other novel silicon technologies, such as Sliver Cells? Or silicon (amorphous) thinfilm maybe?

Reply

cripdyke

52 Comments

  • 1634 Days Ago
  • 08/26/2007

Re: Synergy

I think that, frankly, you failed to understand the article. This tech uses silicon NANOcrystals. Thin films are only valuable because they use less of the  expensive pure silicon crystals grown to large sizes and thicknesses under exacting conditions.

Nanocrystals are even smaller than thin film, which amounts to slicing the expensive crystals very thin so as to use less of an expensive ingredient and thus keep cost of manufacture lower than otherwise.

Nanocrystals are in fact so much smaller as to make comparisons a joke, really. Large, pure crystals are not the raw material for nanocrystals. And the nanocrystals cannot be amorphous... because they are crystals.

Now on the upside, this tech not only gains from the advantages of efficiency inherent in producing different numbers of electrons based on the amount of energy in the striking photon, but since it doesn't start out as a pure crystal -thick disk or thin film- a manufacturer does not incur the expense of paying for the expensive pure-silicon-crystal-growth processes.

So, the "synergy" with these other techs is effectively already in this one: high efficiency from nano, low costs from avoiding using large amounts of large, pure crystals. And yet it is not synergy at all, nor is it something that we must research to apply. Nanocrystals are not merely thin, they are ridiculously small. "Nano" by definition generally refers to things that are no more than a tenth of a millionth of a meter (100 nanometers or 100nm) in at least 2 spacial dimensions. (Although some "nano" work is in the field of nanofilms that meet this requirement in only 1 dimension, thickness, and are designed to be spread over surfaces for much larger distances than 100nm, often even macroscopic distances.) For these crystals they meet the 100nm criterion in all 3 spacial dimensions. As well, it is impossible for a nanocrystal to be amorphous, in the sense of non-crystalline. If it's a nanocrystal, it's a crystal...just a small one.

Hope that helps.

Reply

Siphon

152 Comments

  • 1633 Days Ago
  • 08/27/2007

Re: Re: Synergy

Yes it does, thank you. Amorphous? What was I thinking, duh. Unless of course the nanocrystals were irradiated for long periods of time (but why would one do that?)

The extreme size of the crystals actually sounds very problematic for mass production. How do you deposit these things onto anything adequately and homogeneously? And if that could be done, how do the crystals degrade over time in real world conditions?

Reply

atsilver

1 Comment

  • 1609 Days Ago
  • 09/20/2007

Re: Re: Synergy

I aggree with Siphon on this last point (his/her second paragraph) and hope to see a reply soon (from concept to lab to technology and from here to commercially available products there is also a long way, sometimes unable to be completed). And this is not a minor affair, nor a problem of correct understanding of the article, but a practical point of view.

Reply

rocnewhope

1 Comment

  • 851 Days Ago
  • 10/17/2009

Re: Synergy

I have a factory which make wind turbines, currently we make 5KW VAWT for some big company such as Chinamobile etc, and they want we supply them solar panel too, there is a Chinese guy show me some document and claim he has the exclusive power for produce this product in China and he ask us invest huge money, after meet with him I find he know nothing about technology and business, so, I'd like if you can tell me who has this technology or patents, if there is some possible I can contact with him(them) and discuss about if we can cooperate for start a company in China for make this product, we can invest huge money for this project.
regards
roc
rocnewhope01 at yahoo dot com

Reply

nafisahmed29

1 Comment

  • 555 Days Ago
  • 08/09/2010

Synergy

Can you please help me with these question, i will be very thankful
1. As we know nanocrystalline silicon is having indirect band gap and hence having low absorption coefficient than its counterpart amorphous silicon. So, what should be the optimum thickness of the intrinsic layer required for the complete absorption of solar spectrum?

2. Why the particles with size 100nm or less are only called as nanoparticles?
  

Reply

amol91@gmail.com

1 Comment

  • 910 Days Ago
  • 08/19/2009

Hybrid with polymer solar cells

I would like to know if we could use silicon nanocrystals as dopants in P3HT:PCBM Bulk heterojunction solar cells and whether the efficiency thus achieved would be significant?

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

Claros Diagnostics

Zynga

IBM

Geron

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement