Charging ahead: GM's Volt concept car makes a turn in front of the lab where prototype batteries are being tested that could provide 40 miles of gas-free range. Below, illustrations of the car showing the center-line location for the battery pack.
GM

Energy

Novel Batteries Get a Boost

GM plans to develop batteries with A123 Systems for its new electric vehicle.

  • Monday, August 13, 2007
  • By Kevin Bullis

General Motors has announced it will work directly with A123 Systems, a start-up based in Watertown, MA, to develop batteries that are fine-tuned for the Chevrolet Volt, an electric vehicle scheduled for production in 2010 or 2011. The new agreement between the companies is designed to speed the vehicle to market.

The co-development deal is the latest in a series of announcements by the automaker indicating it is moving forward with plans for the Volt, an extremely fuel efficient hybrid. The Volt, first announced in January, will use batteries that can be recharged from a standard electrical outlet and is expected to get 40 miles on a single charge, eliminating trips to the gas station for average daily driving. While GM has not ruled out using batteries from another supplier, the agreement is a vote of confidence that A123's technology can meet the requirements for the vehicle, says Denise Gray, GM's director of hybrid energy storage devices.

A123 uses a new lithium-ion chemistry that allows its batteries to be much lighter and more compact than the nickel metal hydride batteries in existing hybrids today, and safer than the conventional lithium ion batteries found in consumer electronics. In June GM announced that it is working with the South Korean company LG Chem, and its subsidiary Compact Power, based in Troy, MI, to make both battery packs and the individual cells inside them. They also signed an agreement with an LG Chem competitor, the Frankfurt, Germany-based Continental Automotive Systems, to develop battery packs. Continental had planned to use A123 as a subcontractor to supply the batteries for these packs. The new agreement puts A123 in direct contact with GM on the Volt project.

At the end of 2005, A123 announced its first product, a cylindrical battery for power tools. For the Volt, A123 is shifting to a much bigger and flat, rather than cylindrical, battery cell that takes up significantly less space. Hundreds of these would be combined in a large pack, with control electronics and a cooling system, to power the Volt.

Advertisement

A123 employees have begun testing the new cell. In one test, a prototype cell, a silvery slab about the size of three decks of cards placed side by side, was crushed from the side to demonstrate its abuse tolerance. Unlike conventional lithium-ion batteries, which use a cobalt-oxide material that can overheat and cause laptops and cell phones to burst into flame, A123's batteries use a much more stable, and potentially cheaper, iron phosphate material. The crushed test battery showed no signs of overheating.

Earlier this year GM had picked A123 Systems as a potential supplier of lithium-ion batteries for a new version of its Saturn Vue hybrid that can be recharged by plugging it in, giving it a 10 mile all-electric range. It could be on the roads as early as 2009.

Print

Related Articles

GM Ditches the Gas Tank in Its New Electric Car

It seems few consumers want range-extending gas engines in their electric vehicles.

A Blended Battery Pack for Cars

Combining different battery technologies could improve vehicle performance and reduce costs.

GM to Build Its Own Batteries

Just as the company makes engines, it will now make battery packs for electric cars.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

Jochen

2 Comments

  • 1646 Days Ago
  • 08/13/2007

batteries swap

Thinking about recharging: why not to swap the batteries ? Buying car without batteries and lease them charged at petrol stations. When close to empty swap for a charged one. Charging on night power surplus. The key point: technical arrangement that enables to remove/insert the battery pack (300 kgs or more) within an instant (F1 tyres exchange takes typically 8 seconds, what about a minute here ?)

Reply

tsaidak

18 Comments

  • 1646 Days Ago
  • 08/13/2007

Re: batteries swap

Just to be picky.... at 200 watts per mile (Prius needs 117) the 40 mile pack would weigh 103 lbs.
Why would I want to swap out packs at a 40 mile range when I could recharge at home or at work in undere 5 hrs using a 110v line?  Also, swapping out the packs would be labor intensive compared to pumping gasoline, and actually drive up the cost per mile quite a bit.

Reply

Guest (jpdemers)

  • 1646 Days Ago
  • 08/13/2007

Re: batteries swap

How many fill-ups does your average station handle in a day?  Quadruple that, given the 40-mile range. I doubt service stations are capable of storing a thousand or so 100-lb battery packs, let alone handling the massive electrical load involved in recharging them all.  And trucking in 100,000 lbs of anything on a daily basis is out of the question. 
An interesting option, if the battery pack indeed weighs only 100 lb, would be to double up the batteries.  Increasing the range, while adding less than the weight of an adult passenger, might be worth the added expense to many potential customers.

Reply

Gaetano Marano

246 Comments

  • 1645 Days Ago
  • 08/14/2007

battery swap? >>> yes, just read my "cellphoneCAR" article >>>

.

I agree with the "battery swap" since already suggested in my July 23, 2007 "cellphoneCAR" article:

http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/033cellphoneCAR.html

and also posted comment in this Technology Review article:

http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/19085/

it's a great idea to solve the main electric cars' problem: the (4+ hours) too long
recharge time

.

Reply

Jochen

2 Comments

  • 1638 Days Ago
  • 08/21/2007

Re: battery swap? >>> yes, just read my "cellphoneCAR" article >>>

I got deeper insight into the matter and found that the idea of battery swap is already protected by various patents that date as back as 1995.

Reply

advill

18 Comments

  • 1646 Days Ago
  • 08/13/2007

FLAT BATTS...


Are already in production with Valence, the SAPHION Li-Ph. line has standard lead-acid sizes.

I don´t know how this A123 people is going to avoid the 200 patents Valence has in the process...

Reply

asdar

73 Comments

  • 1646 Days Ago
  • 08/13/2007

Re: FLAT BATTS...

There's a million ways around shape patents, mostly because they're not a breakthrough. I have a flashlight with a square battery that's 20 years old.

Reply

Advertisement

advill

18 Comments

  • 1645 Days Ago
  • 08/14/2007

Re: FLAT BATTS...

Well , i saw much hype of A123, but they have a product that is 5 years behind in relation with Valence this people have some basic research patents related to runaway process which seems no to easy to "go around"...will see.

Reply

asdar

73 Comments

  • 1646 Days Ago
  • 08/13/2007

GM Tying up A123?

This paragraph made me sigh with relief, then grimace wondering if it meant something worse.

Quote:
"The agreement with GM does not mean that A123 will be locked out of doing work with other automakers. The specific cell the two companies develop together will be co-owned--so both companies will have to negotiate for how it might be used, Gray says. That could include putting the pack in cars by other companies, Gray says, since "it's in everyone's interest to achieve economies of scale to drive down battery prices." A123 still retains control over its novel battery chemistry, however. Indeed A123 has had discussions with other automakers and its batteries are set to be used in hybrid buses starting in 2008."
End Quote:

First off it says that A123 is free to deal with who they want, but then comes the line that makes me nervous.

"The specific cell the two companies develop together will be co-owned--so both companies will have to negotiate for how it might be used, Gray says."

Negotiation rights sounds an awful lot like control to me.

I don't mind the idea of GM owning the tech, if they use it. I'm getting NiMh flashbacks from that line.

I hope that the Volt, and A123 are on the road soon.

Reply

cripdyke

52 Comments

  • 1646 Days Ago
  • 08/13/2007

battery ownership

yes, chev volt battery will be co-owned, but a123 can always create a battery w/ different voltage and storage capacity, or even different storage cap and shape but the same voltage. A123 owns the battery tech, but chev would co-own that particular battery. Just because RCA co-owns the energizer C Cell doesn't mean that energizer can no longer sell batteries w/o RCA's permission.

Reply

EHL68

1 Comment

  • 1639 Days Ago
  • 08/20/2007

Re: battery ownership

Fortunately, the article also mentions the many elements being customized for the Volt. 
Quote--
"...electrode chemistry, thickness, the type of electrolyte, and other aspects of the battery cell design..."
--End Quote

In truth though, it will likely come down to which side can produce documents on key  developments toward the final product, and which side has the better patent lawyers!

Good luck, A123!  And to GM--I'm truly looking forward to a Volt as my next car, should it arrive at the 2010 or -11 model year!

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

HTC

BIND Biosciences

Twitter

Facebook

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement