Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

A Wirelessly Powered Lightbulb

Researchers at MIT have created a revolutionary device that could remotely charge batteries and power household appliances.

By Kate Greene

Friday, June 08, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Researchers at MIT have shown that it's possible to wirelessly power a 60-watt lightbulb sitting about two meters away from a power source. Using a remarkably simple setup--basically consisting of two metal coils--they have demonstrated, for the first time, that it is feasible to efficiently send that much power over such a distance. The experiment paves the way for wirelessly charging batteries in laptops, mobile phones, and music players, as well as cutting the electric cords on household appliances, says Marin Soljačić, professor of physics at MIT, who led the team with physics professor John Joannopoulos.

Cutting the cord: MIT researchers have shown that it’s possible to wirelessly power a 60-watt lightbulb from two meters away. Above, a coil (background) creates a magnetic field that is able to pass through an obstruction. The foreground coil resonates at the frequency of the magnetic field, picking up its energy to power the bulb.
Credit: Science

The research, published in the June 7 edition of Science Express (the online publication of Science magazine), is the experimental demonstration of a theory outlined last November by the MIT team. (See "Charging Batteries without Wires.") "We had strong confidence in the theory," says Soljačić. "And experiment indeed confirmed that this worked as predicted."

The setup is straightforward, explains Andre Kurs, an MIT graduate student and the lead author of the paper. Two copper helices, with diameters of 60 centimeters, are separated from each other by a distance of about two meters. One is connected to a power source--effectively plugged into a wall--and the other is connected to a lightbulb waiting to be turned on. When the power from the wall is turned on, electricity from the first metal coil creates a magnetic field around that coil. The coil attached to the lightbulb picks up the magnetic field, which in turn creates a current within the second coil, turning on the bulb.

Story continues below

This type of energy transfer is similar to a well-known phenomenon called magnetic inductive coupling, used in power transformers. However, the MIT scheme is somewhat different because it's based on something called resonant coupling. Transformer coils can only transfer power when they are centimeters apart--any farther, and the magnetic fields don't affect each other in the same way. In order for the MIT researchers to achieve the range of two meters, explains Soljačić, they used coils that resonate at a frequency of 10 megahertz. When the electrical current flows through the first coil, it produces a 10-megahertz magnetic field; since the second coil resonates at this same frequency, it's able to pick up on the field, even from relatively far away. If the second coil resonated at a different frequency, the energy from the first coil would have been ignored.

The researchers' approach, says Soljačić, also makes the energy transfer efficient. If they were to emit power from an antenna in the same way that information is wirelessly transmitted, most of the power would be wasted as it radiates away in all directions. Indeed, with the method used to transfer information, it would be difficult to send enough energy to be useful for powering gadgets. In contrast, the researchers use what's known as nonradiative energy that is bound up near the coils. In this first demonstration, they showed that the scheme can transfer power with an efficiency of 45 percent.

Comments

  • this is new?
    this sounds a lot like something called
    Evanescent wave coupling from an article
    found in wikipedia. Maybe there are some
    detail differences that I don't see.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wireless_energy_transfer
    Rate this comment: 12345

    devassocx
    06/08/2007
    Posts:53
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: this is new?
      I have heard farmer's tales of rigging an induction loop under a high voltage transmission line, and bleeding off enough power to energize an electric fence.  However,I have never seen that in action.

      Oliver
      Rate this comment: 12345

      oeseikel
      06/08/2007
      Posts:2
      • Re: this is new?
        Yeah the fella you are referring to was sued by the electric company and lost since the loss of power on the company's line was measurable due to the farmer's setup.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        zkent
        07/19/2007
        Posts:1
    • Re: this is new?
      In the Wikipedia entry you'll note "Their theoretical analysis showed ...".  They just proved it.  That's the news here.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      barrycoleman
      06/08/2007
      Posts:1
  • a thoughtlessly powered lightbulb
    This project is a dungheap.

    First off, it runs at 10 MHz, which is forbidden by FCC rules because it is a reserved time standard frequency used by NIST.  Should have used the unlicensed 13.56 MHz ISM band instead.  You can talk about near fields and evanescent waves all you want.  This thing is still a magnetic dipole, and it still radiates some energy, too much at this power level.  Did anyone tune a shortwave receiver to 10 MHz and walk around the experiment with it? Or would that be too obvious?

    45% efficiency is nothing to crow about.  It's lousy, requiring 133 watts to drive a 60 watt bulb.  On top of that, I bet that number is coil in to coil out efficiency, not wall socket to light bulb.  A simple power cord will be at least 99% efficient, socket to bulb, more if you use a fatter cord.  That's why we use wires, dummy.

    Having this thing running all the time is the electromagnetic equivalent of turning on the fire sprinklers, so that whenever you are thirsty, all you have to do is hold out your cup.

    And patents?  Ludicrous...  Undercoupled tuned transformers are as old as radio itself, obvious to those skilled in the art, and have long since been used for power transfer.  Check old issues of Popular Electronics.  I believe there was an article back in the 1960s for a crystal radio that tuned to any strong AM station to get enough power to drive a small amplifier for the weak ones.  Sure, it's farfield not nearfield, but the difference is trivial.  Tuned nearfield induction has been applied to RFID tags and in many other ways over the years.

    Look at the diameter of the coils and their spacing.  Want greater distance?  No sweat, just scale the coil diameters proportionately.  Who wants coils that big for distances that small?  And as an EM expert, I know that there is no magic to be uncovered in playing with the coil configuration.  Sure, there is some improvement moving from a solenoid to a pancake winding, but nothing to write home about.  Wanna see a pancake winding at play?  A lot of museum Tesla coils use them for the primary winding, and Tesla coils are (brace yourself) less then unity coupled, resonant inductors.

    I'm embarrased for the undergrads who are hyping this thing.  It's an experiment that could have been done in a high school electronics class.  But, to the young everything is new, and therefore has obviously never been thought of before.  Wow, how dumb we have all been to have overlooked this magnetic miracle.  Including, apparently, Tesla, Marconi, DeForest...
    Rate this comment: 12345

    salammoniac
    06/08/2007
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    • Re: a thoughtlessly powered lightbulb
      Sure, old Nik Tesla did this--without computers, and he did so with higher efficiency and much greater range. Some years back I pulled it off without a reciever coil, and at about 15-20 feet, and scared the living crap out of myself. Systems like this can put out nasty little surges of vastly higher peak power than whatever is rated--mine burned a hole through insulated aluminum sheet metal. Sure, the new ones might control that, but ANYTHING that receives this power by coupling even a little, even at a microscopic level, can be cooked! I never tried my test a second time, because I knew if the transfer went wrong, I might light up and cook.
        Great lab trick, but like home nuclear reactors, not too wise.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      kitk
      06/08/2007
      Posts:65
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • A Wirelessly Powered Lightbulb
    Exciting.This could by extension light some villages in Africa that are enclaved since cost would have been tremendously cut down by eliminating poles,transformers,labour,time etc...wonderful!
    Rate this comment: 12345

    mehzang
    06/08/2007
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
    • Re: A Wirelessly Powered Lightbulb
      Sure, and if you believe the hype, all it would take to light the whole world would be something the size of a trash barrel attached to a pole in
      Mexico.  You have attributed powers to this noninvention that defy the laws of physics.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      salammoniac
      06/08/2007
      Posts:2
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
  • not safe for me
    I recently acquired a pacemaker. The instructions that came with it say "NO MRI". Somewhere in the circuits in my device there is sure to be a loop that could resonate to any frequency being used to transmit power - maybe even in the case enclosing the device. This is a fact that Bell Labs learned a long time ago. This proposal scared the heck out of me.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    blackfootx2
    06/08/2007
    Posts:1
  • I must be missing something...
    Well, I bow to the "greater minds" at MIT, but exactly what is new and revolutionary about inductively coupling circuits consisting of self-resonant air-wound coils?  I believe I did exactly that as a kid while studying for my novice amateur radio license some 35 years ago (at the time, the underlying theory and practical applications were already 60 years old). That aside, do these students have any comprehension of the adverse effects of stray coupling with unintentional resonant circuits commly found outside of a laboratory environment?  Household wiring and appliances make wonderful resonant circuits and antennas, coupling with and re-radiating RF energy with very unpredictable results.  As one of the previous poster's noted, experimentation at 10Mhz would appear to be improper.  But again, I'll defer to those novel researchers who "discovered" this 100-year old technology.  
    Rate this comment: 12345

    K1GIL
    06/08/2007
    Posts:1
    • Re: I must be missing something...
      Actually, I think that Nickolo Tesla might have been doing this kind of thing (in principle) out in Colorado a long time before either you or I had to pass that radio theory test!  :-)

      The resonant coupling idea sounds strangely similar to a tuned antenna, dont it!

      I guess in a world where electronics is defined by FFTs the concept of doing it with hardware does APPEAR to be new.  (Any science sufficiently advanced will appear to be magic!  Right?  :-)  )

      _ _ . . .  . . . _ _

      73 de KN6LX
      Rate this comment: 12345

      KN6LX
      06/10/2007
      Posts:2
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • Wireless DeSpin
    Would wireless despinning of an asteroid move its
    trajectory enough to miss the earth?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    abcarterjr
    06/08/2007
    Posts:45
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Wireless DeSpin
      "De-spinning" an asteroid would change its rotational momentum, but would not change the orbital parameters of its center of gravity one iota!

      Sorry.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      KN6LX
      06/11/2007
      Posts:2
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
    • Re: Wireless DeSpin
      Yes  yes...  I think we can...neee they can the grads at MIT,  do we seek some funds!!
      Rate this comment: 12345

      majipa
      06/03/2008
      Posts:1
  • New?

    New? This technology was invented by Nikola Tesla more than 100 years ago. Time to recognize his work.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    alpha 07
    06/09/2007
    Posts:1
  • why so skeptical?
    I’m told that the normal progression of new science is someting like: 1) What a stupid idea, they’re idiots 2) It will never work, they’re idiots, 3) Someone thought of that long ago, they’re idiots, and finally, 4) I thought of it first.

    If I were to be a better person than that, I’d point out that there really are surprising and newsworthy results here, that there is a selectivity in tuning suggested by the helix shapes that we know nothing about, that the AC carrier is delivering way more DC power densities than we’d expect, and that Tesla’s nonlinear resonance has never been explained in a way that experts agree upon.  Certainly increased understandings of surprising results usually leads to huge leaps in efficacy, so the applications of running light bulbs and charging lap-tops are symbolic baby steps.  Consider that the electric automobile operated from wires embedded in the roadway, powering electric motors in cars, if made to work, are 20 times more efficient than gas autos, (fully-loaded, measured from crude-in-the-ground through transportation-at-the-pavement), making a 700 mile-per-gallon automobile equivalent, from coal, using not a drop of foreign oil, not a drop of petroleum chemistry.  It’s not problem-free, but it’s problems are suddenly 20 times less in magnitude.  Societies change with less than this.

    Even these thoughts are primitive. 

    IMHO, that this has a huge potential is confirmed by the universal negativity of the comments offered.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    stustanton
    06/09/2007
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    • Re: why so skeptical?
      Thanks for your positive input about wireless power transmission. I agree with you regarding potential use that will add much greater distances to plug in hybrid and all electric vehicles. The first thing that I could imagine was having all of our major highways retrofitted with the coils described here under the roadway emitting available power to all types of automobiles containing the matching receiver passing over them. This would definitely solve the distance issues posed by current battery technology limitations allowing a bridging technique until power storage technology catches up. This can potentially bring about the reality of electric propulsion drivetrains for automobiles and finally make electricity a practical power source for transportation. Is there enough efficiency here in this transfer medium to qualify it as a feasible solution? If so, it is not hard to imagine where this will take us.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      attoigo
      06/09/2007
      Posts:2
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • Tesla?
    I believe this was done, about 100 years ago or so. In the book "Tesla: Master of Lightning" there is a photograph of a lit light bulb inside a series of coiled wires. A caption from a Century Magazine article about Telsa read, "The coil shown in the photograph has its lower end or terminal connected to the ground, and is exactly attuned to the vibrations of a distant electrical oscillator." (June 1900)
    Rate this comment: 12345

    BuckyOHare
    06/10/2007
    Posts:4
  • MIT Tech. Review
    I once loved this publication but -- as the reviews on this piece show -- the Review has fallen on hard times.  Even a lay person such as myself knows that the tech. for this wirelessly powered lightbulb is not anything like new.  Frequently the pieces published are neither about technology nor new.  Too bad, too bad.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    rttedrow
    06/11/2007
    Posts:43
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: MIT Tech. Review
      The way I see this as an EE the efficiency is too poor.
      At higher power? the loss is so high and it really become useless.
      Our PS technology is having difficulties to break that 90% barrier for efficiency.(wasting millions of dollars and lots of energy by every day on that 10%)
      So this technology with that 45% efficiency I'm not sure can be good for any practical use.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      ufolj
      06/11/2007
      Posts:1
      • Re: MIT Tech. Review
        IMHO this would created a definite increase in your electric bill...and for what, to be anal about not wanting some cords around the house?
        Rate this comment: 12345

        TMacshane
        08/08/2007
        Posts:3
  • got a better one
    Agreed, this is very close, if not identical to reinventing the wheel, but I had a bizarre experience when a corporate belch put me in a group developing a microwave powered lightbulb. Although there is nothing wrong with such a thing,(it does exist, for strong UV sources), and the science was seemingly ok, all the other stuff, like dumping hundreds of watts of unshielded gigahertz into peoples living rooms somehow was of no concern. The concept that the shielding would have to be mostly opaque didn't bother management; it was just an engineering detail.  Many millions were spent on this project. 
    Rate this comment: 12345

    hmwogglebugt...
    06/12/2007
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • Really?
    What is it with this society and claiming old ideas as new?  This reminds me of the "new" hard drive technology recently of putting bits vertically through the platter.  Turns out to be 1970s technology.  Nice to see old ideas get used, but claiming them as new?  I don't think so.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    greg1975
    06/26/2007
    Posts:1
  • 1960's Popular Electronics Project
    Knock, Knock!  1965 or 1966 monthly project I built to light a bulb via radio-waves, not even needing to be near the source.

    Stop wasting money on experimenting, and spend more time reading through old consumer magazines.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    JonD
    07/26/2007
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • A Wirelessly Powered Lightbulb
    Thanks for your positive input about wireless power transmission. I agree with you regarding potential use that will add much greater distances to plug in hybrid and all electric vehicles.

    regards,
    darcylars
    http://www.lyco.co.uk/
    Rate this comment: 12345

    darcylars
    08/29/2009
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Making 3D Maps on the Move
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.