Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Massive Offshore Wind Turbines Safe for Birds

Infrared monitoring shows that savvy seabirds steer clear of wind turbines.

By Peter Fairley

Monday, February 12, 2007

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Uncertainty surrounding wind power's impact on wildlife--particularly the potential for deadly collisions between birds and turbines--has tarnished its image and even delayed some wind farms. Indeed, the first large offshore wind farm proposed for U.S. waters--the Cape Wind project in Massachusetts's Nantucket Sound--has been held up in part by concerns that its 130 turbines could kill thousands of seabirds annually. Now a simple infrared collision-detection system developed by Denmark's National Environmental Research Institute is helping clear the air.

A heat-activated infrared video camera mounted on the turbine records deadly bird crashes on Denmark’s offshore wind farms.
Credit: Mark Desholm

The Thermal Animal Detection System (TADS) is essentially a heat-activated infrared video camera that watches a wind turbine around the clock, recording deadly collisions much as a security camera captures crimes. The first results, released this winter as part of a comprehensive $15 million study of Denmark's large offshore wind farms, show seabirds to be remarkably adept at avoiding offshore installations. "There had been suggestions that enormous numbers of birds would be killed," says Robert Furness, a seabird specialist at the University of Glasgow, who chaired the study's scientific advisory panel. "There's a greater feeling now among European politicians that marine wind farms are not going to be a major ecological problem, and therefore going ahead with construction is not going to raise lots of political difficulties."

The Danish findings are also resonating across the Atlantic, casting doubt on worst-case scenarios presented by Cape Wind's opponents. "The results make us guardedly optimistic," says Taber Allison, vice president for conservation science at the Lincoln, MA-based conservation group Mass Audubon and an outspoken critic of ecological studies by Boston-based Cape Wind Associates.

TADS was developed to solve a problem specific to monitoring bird collisions at offshore wind farms, in this case the 80-turbine Horns Rev wind farm off Denmark's North Sea coast and the 72-turbine Nysted wind farm in the Baltic. The Danish researchers at Horns Rev and Nysted used visual monitoring and radar tracking, which showed that most birds avoided the farms altogether or flew down the half-kilometer-wide gaps between the wind farms' orderly rows of turbines. But the researchers still could not rule out the possibility that some birds were flying close enough to strike the turbine blades, which spin as fast as 80 meters per second at the tip. Of particular concern were larger seabirds, especially the common eiders that migrate through the area. "We were concerned that these large, rather clumsy birds might not be able to maneuver around the turbines," says Danish environmental institute researcher Mark Desholm, who designed TADS.

What makes TADS practical for continuous operation is software Desholm wrote to activate recording when a warm object enters the video camera's field of vision. According to Furness, the need to sift through thousands of hours of film was a major limitation for researchers who had previously tried infrared monitoring. He says that other automated collision monitoring that relies on vibration sensors on the blades and towers has failed to produce a reliable system. "This is the first system which has really functioned," says Furness.

Comments

  • A huge boost for wind power
    The results from Denmark and ability to perform similar collision studies at other locations are a great advancement for wind power. This combined with the recent announcement that the National Audubon Society "strongly supports wind power as a clean alternative energy source" should help reduce opposition to wind power and allow researchers and investors to focus more time and energy on improving the efficiency of the technology and establishing wind farms with minimal ecological impact.

    www.alternativee.org
    Rate this comment: 12345

    alternativee...
    02/12/2007
    Posts:9
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: A huge boost for wind power
      Finally!  Someone has figured out a way of proving that birds are not as dumb as many folks seem to think they are.  If they can avoid raptors they can avoid blades.  Not all of them, but not all of them can avoid raptors either.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      deirdrebeth
      02/12/2007
      Posts:25
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • Wind Turbine Reliability
    I know it depends on location, but does anyone know the percentage of time that turbines produce, say, less than 75% of rated output and the approximate cost per kwh?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Rand
    02/12/2007
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Wind Turbine Reliability
      Wind turbines are useful less then 25% of the time.

      Lovelock, in his recent "Revenge of Gaia" on p 83 says:

      Windpower "at best provides energy only 25% of the time".

      I believe windpower (without subsidy) costs 2.5X to 3X the cost of conventional power.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      lambdafunds
      02/13/2007
      Posts:9
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
      • Re: Wind Turbine Reliability
        Windpower is currently 3-5 cents a kwh, and building of new wind turbines is growing at over 20% a year because it is cheaper than coal now.

        What looks really interesting is 'kitegen' technology, which uses kites and a vertical turbine rather than a horizontal turbine with propellers.

        Power = 0.5*rotor sweep area*(wind Velocity)^3*Air density

        Is the equation used for wind power. New Kitegen technology has a sweep area about 10x larger and a wind velocity roughly 2x higher and occurs more consistently than at the altitude of a normal turbine w/o a much higher cost of setup. They claim 0.1 cents a KWH with a kitegen turbine (as opposed to 3-5 cents for conventional turbines or 5-8 cents for coal). However they are currently only building the first 5 MW prototype. If this works it'll change the world of energy.

        www.chim.unisi.it/portovenere/portovenere/PPT%20PDF/Milanese.pdf

        http://www.sequoiaonline.com/blogs/htm/progetto_eng.htm
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Todd
        02/13/2007
        Posts:5
      • Re: Wind Turbine Reliability
        The average capacity factor cited by the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, for wind farms for the majority of 2005 is 35%.  That being average, some farms are in the mid to high 20's, and some are in the low to mid 40's.  Farms running at "less than 25%" would not be economically viable in today's market.

        I'm sorry, but the comment on subsidies is absurd.  Coal power plants produce at 3-4 cents/kWh, gas is 4-8 cents/kWh FOR FUEL ALONE, but when you note subsidies for wind power without commenting on subsidies for conventional power, you lose all credibility.  Go to www.awea.org/pubs/factsheets/Subsidy.pdf and take a look.  I'm honestly interested if you can poke holes in the numbers, but the American Wind Energy Association prides itself on solid numbers. 
        Rate this comment: 12345

        michaelbaaro...
        02/14/2007
        Posts:1
      • Re: Wind Turbine Reliability
        Wind turbines on towers aren't the best looking things, but wind generators on kites would look cool.

        I suspect, rather than being THE savior, wind will form part of the future power mix.  In any case, our problem is really more in storing power than in generating it.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        GaryB
        02/16/2007
        Posts:64
        Avg Rating:
        4/5
        • Re: Wind Turbine Reliability
          VRB Power Systems has developed a system that addresses this problem.  They are going to be implementing it on a planned 39MW wind farm in Ireland.  The storage system proposed for the Sorne Hill Windfarm will be able to supply 12 megawatt-hours of electricity, or 1.5 megawatts over eight hours.  It should be enough to power 300 to 400 homes on a typical working day.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          salman
          02/17/2007
          Posts:1
  • What about evolution?
    Even if lots of birds/bats/moths crashed into the turbines at first, shouldn't we expect these fast-breeding species to evolve to avoid the blades?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ms
    02/12/2007
    Posts:129
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Fails to address #1 U.S. concern
    This study seems to concentrate on the threat of seabird collisions in offshore wind farms.

    But the study does not address the main potential threat of offshore wind farms off the U.S. east coast:  songbird collisions due to Aircraft warning lights required on tall towers by the F.A.A. (Federal Aviation Administration)

    Aircraft warning lights on towers, especially red or yellow lights or those that do not pause long enough between pulses, cause songbirds to circle towers until they become exhausted or collide with guy wires, towers themselves or turbines.

    So unless these infrared devices are sensitive enough to see warblers and other tiny songbirds in bad weather (often a contributing factor with tower lighting in tower-collisions), they offer false hope in detecting bird deaths.

    At any rate - the study mentioned in this article DOES NOT address the most serious concerns about offshore wind farms off the eastern U.S. coast.

    Nathan Dias
    Executive Director
    Cape Romain Bird Observatory
    Rate this comment: 12345

    diasn
    02/12/2007
    Posts:5
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
    • Re: Fails to address #1 U.S. concern
      Considering the system was able to identify a *moth* I'm fairly certain it would be able to identify small songbirds...or any other sort for that matter.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      deirdrebeth
      02/12/2007
      Posts:25
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
    • Re: Fails to address #1 U.S. concern
      In all the controversey about birdstrikes, I fail to see any references to combating the problem of birdkill in the cities with tall buildings. These bird kills do not seem to appreciably decrease the population of birds in the cities. Is there any research in stopping birds from flying into these buildings? Producing energy is far more important in many respects than worrying about a few birds being killed. That said, I am an ardent tree hugger but I think producing pollution free power is a far more important task AT THIS TIME than worrying about some bird kill.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      M.Finkel@yah...
      02/12/2007
      Posts:1
      • Re: Fails to address #1 U.S. concern
        In a similar vein, how many birds are killed by cats each year? Plenty. One suspects that the bird "issue" is a proxy for an objection that is less easily made. After all, it would be hard for a summer resident of Hyannisport to convince a crowd that his view is more important than the energy/climate crisis.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        wmerck
        02/13/2007
        Posts:5
        • Re: Fails to address #1 U.S. concern
          I agree that cats are a huge problem.

          That is why I trap feral cats and roaming ones as well, to turn into the shelter to be eventually destroyed if not adopted (seldom the case).
          Rate this comment: 12345

          diasn
          09/25/2007
          Posts:5
          Avg Rating:
          1/5
      • Re: Fails to address #1 U.S. concern
        We are talking about MIGRATING birds here.  Ones that pass overhead by the millions unseen while you sleep.

        The discussion is not about "local birds" at all.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        diasn
        09/25/2007
        Posts:5
        Avg Rating:
        1/5
  • Biggest Obstacle of Cape Cod Wind Farm
    The biggest obstacle to the proposed wind farm off the shore of Cape Cod is, of course, Ted Kennedy. Can anyone seriously doubt that if the project was proposed anywhere other then near his vacation home that as a committed environmentalist he'd be a passionate advocate in favor?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    mherskovitz
    02/12/2007
    Posts:1
    • Re: Biggest Obstacle of Cape Cod Wind Farm
      There are hundreds of citizen's groups and hundreds of thousands of people all over the world that agree with Ted Kennedy.  All these individuals just don't make the news.

      The desire to reduce fossil fuel emissions is commendable, but it can compel otherwise sensible people to support wind initiatives at any cost, in any location, and without any investigation into potential consequences.  It must be examined whether the elusive benefits of large-scale wind energy development are enough to justify the further destruction of rural communities and our natural environment.

      Don't you agree that at least some common sense guidelines on the siting these industrial turbines should come into the picture somewhere?  ...or is it a giant free-for-all with these wind corporations given total control to do whatever they please?  Wind advocates are beginning to sound like religious zealots who would bring back the Spanish Inquisition in a heartbeat. 

      Search your soul.  Examine how balanced your thinking is on this matter. 
      Rate this comment: 12345

      moe146
      02/14/2007
      Posts:2
      • Re: Biggest Obstacle of Cape Cod Wind Farm
        I don't buy the "environmental-destruction-by-windmills" argument. The whole "danger to birds" thing sounds extremely phony. Probably a lot more birds die because of collision with aircraft.

        Some of the most nature friendly nations have adopted windpower - eg. Denmark and Holland. There is no news of bird problems from these countries. American birds are stupider, and will fly into the blades? Get real.

        http://www.windpower.org/en/core.htm
        Rate this comment: 12345

        gabrielg01
        02/14/2007
        Posts:400
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
        • Re: Biggest Obstacle of Cape Cod Wind Farm
          So what is your explanation for this?:

          http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/5108666.stm

          Sounds like you are getting all your information from the powerful wind industry lobby groups.  The have millions to spin their fairy tales and downplay the negatives.  Would you to to a tobacco lobbyist to get the lowdown on cigarettes?   Try looking at the other side of the coin:

          www.windaction.org
          Rate this comment: 12345

          moe146
          02/15/2007
          Posts:2
          • Re: Biggest Obstacle of Cape Cod Wind Farm
            Thanks moe, that's a good link - important to know.
            Then it looks like the bird safety might be dependent on the actual habitat, and the type of bird species that live there.

            Isn't then a *far* offshore windfarm good? There aren't too many birds flying around 200 miles off the coast, are there?
            Rate this comment: 12345

            gabrielg01
            02/18/2007
            Posts:400
            Avg Rating:
            3/5
          • Re: Biggest Obstacle of Cape Cod Wind Farm
            "most wind farms would not cause any harm to birds but that the Smola wind farm had been badly sited in a place where it put white-tailed eagles at risk."

            Which really says it all.  Siting a wind farm where large, relatively unmaneuverable birds are in residence was probably an error.  However, as has already been demonstrated, almost all wind farms have little or no impact (or impacts) on birds.

            You are, in fact, arguing the general from the specific, in that you are saying that, since one wind farm was badly sited and impacted local wildlife, all wind farms are badly sited and will impact local wildlife, which is clearly neither accurate nor sensible.

            Wind farms may be expensive to install, but their maintenance costs are low and their fuel is free.  long term, the energy is cheap.  But, once again, the US lags behind Europe in an important technology, because of special interest groups.
            Rate this comment: 12345

            Seanforester
            08/03/2007
            Posts:1
            Avg Rating:
            3/5
  • Cape Cod windfarm will help birds
    The effect of an offshore windfarm could in fact improve the local ecosystem. The towers would provide underwater nesting areas for fish - a sort of artificial reef system. More fish is better for the seabirds, and also for the local fishermen.

    Kennedy&Co just don't get it.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    gabrielg01
    02/14/2007
    Posts:400
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Cape Cod windfarm will help birds
      Still hurts migratory songbirds, which pass over the coastal waters in the millions.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      diasn
      09/25/2007
      Posts:5
      Avg Rating:
      1/5
      • Re: Cape Cod windfarm will help birds
        Since you are concerned about the song birds flying along the coastal areas, you must know how far out they fly right?  You have done research on their flight pattern right? Or are you just talking to hear yourself?  Please present some data.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        anewdave2pla...
        11/06/2007
        Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Making 3D Maps on the Move
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.