(Page 2 of 2)
The main achievement of Grätzel's new research, which appears in the current issue of the Journal of the American Chemical Society, is that it examines the interactions at work in the system in great detail, says Brian Holcroft, CEO of Hydrogen Solar, a company based in Guildford, UK, that is developing ways to mass-produce panels inspired by Grätzel's materials. The findings suggest several strategies that could help the iron-oxide-based panel reach the 10 percent efficiency level that would make the technology competitive with current ways of creating hydrogen, Holcroft says. (Iron oxide could theoretically be as much as 20 percent efficient.) These include adjusting the amount and arrangement of silicon and cobalt, and improving the structure of the films.
If this level of efficiency can be met, hydrogen-generating solar energy could mitigate some of the challenges that threaten to make hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles impractical, says George Sverdrup, hydrogen technology manager at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), in Golden, CO. For example, if consumers and businesses used these panels to make hydrogen, rather than getting hydrogen from a large facility, it would cut out the cost of shipping hydrogen, making hydrogen more affordable. Solar-to-hydrogen panels would be more efficient than small electrolysis machines, and they would ensure that the hydrogen comes from a renewable source.
But challenges remain. Researchers at Hydrogen Solar, for example, are looking for a replacement for the expensive platinum now used in one of the cell's electrodes, which will be important for keeping down costs, especially as demand increases for platinum in this and other applications, such as fuel cells. Meanwhile, Sverdrup says other researchers, including those at NREL, are working with materials that are much more efficient than iron oxide but so far have lasted only hours. If researchers can make them last longer, the materials could challenge iron oxide.
What is the point of pursuing a device to facilitate hydrogen production only, when to achieve the same result one could simply attach a traditional solar cell to a traditional electrolysis cell.Wouldn't this be more practical and efficient? The electricity is the important part is it not?This is an interesting concept;however,
why not devote this human energy into increasing the efficiency and implementation of PV cells and skip the sidetracking?
This is such a fascinating technology with exciting potential. Thank you for the excellent question. Here's my thoughts on your question:
It's simply more energy efficient to convert sunlight directly to hydrogen. PV is, at best, 30% efficient, multiplied by the 10% efficiency of the Swiss process and you get about a total of 3% energy efficiency. By energy efficiency, I believe what's meant is for a given amount of sunlight energy striking the surface of either the PV cell or the photoelectric hydrogen electrode, only 10% (in the case of the Swiss photoelectrode) is converted to an equivalent amount of hydrogen.
(I am a Ph.D. researcher in the field of Materials Chemistry and Process Development with an abiding interest in photoelectrochemical hydrogen generation. I have worked on organo-metallic doped titania films as electrode materials for photoelectrochemical hydrogen generation. Clearly, the Swiss technology is a real breakthrough especially in terms of electrode stability and energy conversion efficiency. I'm looking forward to reading about more breakthroughs in these areas).
The issue here is end-to-end energy budget. There are energy requirements for the manufacture of both solar electrolytic and ferric oxide systems and there are also efficiency issues related to the operation of the product. This concept is very interesting and shows enough promise that it should be studied further. I would like to see a determination of the overall energy cost for manufacture and operation including periodic servicing for both approaches. What is the cost in watt hours and dollars per watt of final product? That would be an interesting comparison.
To answer your question with a question, how is increasing the conversion efficiency of solar energy to hydrogen while eliminating a step (converting first to electricity to use in the electrolysis of water, two very inefficient processes) sidetracking anything?
As well as the energy efficiency gains to be had by removing the interim step, to me the great advantage is that the process converts non-storable solar energy into energy that can be stored in definitely and used at a later date i.e. after dark.
The second great advantage of this approach is that potentially each household could generate and store its own power needs locally. If coupled with a fuel cell vehicle the household would become completely energy independent.
Does anyone know of any companies or universities that might be attempting to prove such an approach could work?
This looks very interesting for mother earth.. How far we from having a bulk solution for Hydrogen genration
Chandra, try these links to get a feel for that:
http://www.thegreencarwebsite.co.uk/blog/index.php/2010/06/21/scientists-make-new-hydrogen-generation-breakthrough-2/
http://podcasts.aaas.org/science_podcast/SciencePodcast_080801.mp3
http://www.hydrogencarsnow.com/blog2/index.php/hydrogen-fuel-production/compressed-gridshift-hydrogen-fuel-at-2-51-per-gallon-breakthrough/
http://www.asemblon.com/energy/hydrnol-intro
http://www.physorg.com/news384.html
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:
On Twitter
Become a Fan on Facebook
Subscribe to the Feed
clauder357
1 Comment
What "holes" are we talking about?
That way, holes could easily escape into the water, where they prompt the generation of oxygen gas.
sorry I did not undersatnd , here.
Reply
ralf
1 Comment
Re: What
A hole is the shortage of an electron.
When the electons move from left to right, a "hole" (absence of an electron) moves from right to left. When water splits and the oxigen atoms combine, electons move into the wire to fill up the "hole". It is as if "holes" move into the water. The H atoms combine with H2O to form 2 H3O+, which travel to the other end of the wire where they pick up electons and form water and H2 molecules.
Reply