Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

A Practical Fuel-Cell Power Plant

GE's advance allows for a solid-oxide fuel cell to use coal-based fuels at costs approaching that of conventional power plants.

By David Talbot

Monday, October 23, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

One of the most efficient ways to produce power at future coal-gasification power plants is with solid-oxide fuel cells, which use the hydrogen from the gas stream to generate electricity through chemical reactions. This is more efficient than simply combusting the gas stream from coal gasification. And unlike other types of fuel cells, the solid-oxide variety can operate at very high temperatures and efficiencies, and be scaled up to provide cities with power.

GE’s new solid-oxide fuel-cell prototype achieves a cost breakthrough thanks to a low-cost manufacturing process that assembles ceramic and electrolyte layers. The six-kilowatt device, which converts hydrocarbon fuel to electricity at an efficiency of 49 percent, is currently being evaluated by the U.S. Department of Energy for possible use for power generation in future coal-gasification plants. (Credit: GE)

But among the various challenges to developing the technology, manufacturing cost has been a potential deal breaker. Now, researchers at GE have demonstrated a manufacturing method that assembles layers of ceramic and electrolyte materials cheaply so that the final product can be built for about $800 a kilowatt, which starts to approach the $500-to-$550-per-kilowatt cost of building a conventional gas-fired power plant.

GE's six-kilowatt prototype achieves 49 percent efficiency in converting fuel into electricity, which compares favorably with the 35 percent efficiency of conventional coal-burning power plants. "I do believe GE has established a new state of the art," says Wayne Surdoval, technology manager for fuel cells at the National Energy Technology Laboratory, part of the U.S. Department of Energy, which is funding this project and others aimed at producing better solid-oxide fuel cells. "The bottom line," he adds, is that the GE prototype "is a particularly inexpensive fuel cell to make. Basically, you are using simple manufacturing techniques using fairly inexpensive materials in the cell."

Surdoval likens the process to making pizza dough. Three sets of materials--representing the two electrodes and one electrolyte that make up each layer of a fuel cell--are mixed and put through two rollers that squeeze them. "You have three different doughs, you flatten each one, then layer them, then flatten them," he explains. "Then basically, you bake it."

The process paves the way for mass manufacture, according to Kelley Fletcher, the advanced-technology leader for sustainable-energy programs at GE Global Research, in Niskayuna, NY. "People have made fuel cells that make more power, and people have also made ones that have done this efficiency level," he says. "But to do so in one package, and at the cost estimate that we have done, is the real achievement here." Previous prototypes have cost thousands of dollars per kilowatt to manufacture, he says.

Comments

  • the waste heat can be captured
    In addition to the 49% efficiency of the fuel cell stack, if it is used onsite at a building, the waste heat can be captured for domestic water and space heating.  It could possibly even be used for air conditioning. 

    Better yet, if the reliable DC electric output could be used directly for electronic devices (such as for a computer server farm), you avoid all the costs and losses of converting to AC and back to DC.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    MarkShapiro
    10/23/2006
    Posts:13
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Overall Efficiencies and fuels on SOFC
    In all new technologies, we need to evaluate the overall system efficiency.
    This is the energy used from manufacturing the components going all the way up to having the system operating and producing some type of energy (electricity or heat basically).

    It would be interesting to evaluate the amount of energy involved on producing a unit of SOFC, let’s say 1 kWe, and compare with other technologies.
    I believe there is a huge amount of energy involved on preparing the wafers of ceramic electrodes and cocking them at high temperatures (usually above 1000°C).
    A similar case occurs on making the silicon ingots for solar photovoltaic cells that at the end will be less than 15% efficient.

    The good point for SOFC is the possibilities for heat recovery and co-generation from which an important amount of high quality heat can be recovered and utilized for space heating, process heat, process steam or moving an adsorption chiller for A/A.
    On this way we could reach easily 75% up to 85% efficiencies. This is very good.

    Another point is to include the efficiency for making the syngas from coal.

    An alternative approach is the use of conventional heating oil (with very low sulfur content) directly on SOFC, without pre-reforming, since the infrastructure for using heating oil is already in place.
    At the SOFC operating temperature it is possible to use this fuel.
    Some Japanese,UK and American universities support this route on SOFC.
    Based on this fuel, the deployment of residential and commercial SOFC would be easily enabled.

    49% fuel cell efficiency is a very good figure and if we could place on top on this a heat recovery system even better.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    eminentas
    10/23/2006
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Green house gases comnparission
    Does anybody have some pointers to information on the percentage difference of CO2 produced from converting the coal to Syngas, separating out the hydrogen and converting it to electricity  as opposed to just burning coal to produce the same amount of electricity?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    TaffyDownUnd...
    10/26/2006
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • pressure
    I think SoFC work better at higher pressure. A combined cycle turbine working with the SOFC cell might be able to take advantage of the pressure bonus.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    asdar
    11/01/2006
    Posts:69
    Avg Rating:
    4/5

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Making 3D Maps on the Move
Technology Review November/December 2009

Current Issue

Natural Gas Changes the Energy Map
The United States has vast supplies of this cleaner fossil fuel. But how should we use it?
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.