Energy

Solar Cells for Cheap

(Page 3 of 3)

  • Tuesday, September 12, 2006
  • By Kevin Bullis

TR: Silicon cells have a head-start ramping up production levels. This continues to raise the bar for new technologies, which don't yet have economies of scale. Can a brand-new type of cell catch up to silicon?

MG: A very reputable journal [Photon Consulting] just published predictions for module prices for silicon for the next 10 years, and they go up the first few years. In 10 years, they still will be above three dollars, and that's not competitive.

Yes, people are trying to make silicon in a different way, but there's another issue: energy payback. It takes a lot of energy to make silicon out of sand, because sand is very stable. If you want to sustain growth at 40-50 percent, and it takes four or five years to pay all of the energy back [from the solar cells], then all of the energy the silicon cells produce, and more, will be used to fuel the growth.

And mankind doesn't gain anything. Actually, there's a negative balance. If the technology needs a long payback, then it will deplete the world of energy resources. Unless you can bring that payback time down to where it is with dye-cells and thin-film cells, then you cannot sustain that big growth. And if you cannot sustain that growth, then the whole technology cannot make a contribution.

TR: Why does producing your technology require less energy?

MG: The silicon people need to make silicon out of silicon oxide. We use an oxide that is already existing: titanium oxide. We don't need to make titanium out of titanium oxide.

TR: An exciting area of basic research now is using nanocrystals, also called quantum dots, to help get past theoretical limits to solar-cell efficiency. Can dye-sensitized cells play a role in the development of this approach?

MG: When you go to quantum dots, you get a chance to actually harvest several electrons with one photon. So how do you collect those? The quantum dots could be used instead of a [dye] sensitizer in solar cells. When you put those on the titanium dioxide support, the quantum dot transfers an electron very rapidly. And we have shown that to happen.

TR: You are campaigning for increased solar-cell research funding, and not just for Grätzel cells.

MG: There's room for everybody.

I am excited that the United States is taking a genuine interest in solar right now, after the complete neglect for 20 years. The Carter administration supported solar, but then during the Reagan administration, it all dropped down by a factor of 10. And labs like NREL [National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, CO] had a hard time surviving. But I think there is going to be more funding.

Print

Related Articles

Cheap, Durable Nonsilicon Solar Cells

An advanced dye boosts the efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells.

Better Plastic Solar Cells

Improved dyes and electrolytes could make the Grätzel solar-cell design more practical.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

janakiblum

3 Comments

  • 1981 Days Ago
  • 09/12/2006

Nice, but will it really make a difference?

The advances in solar energy are exhilarating for the rest of us, but I wonder if the present political administration in the USA would take notice, now that oil companies have allegedly found new oil fields offshore near New Orleans.

Reply

lund1967

8 Comments

  • 1981 Days Ago
  • 09/12/2006

Re: Nice, but will it really make a difference?

What does the government have to do with this?  It sounds like making cheap solar cells would make it easier for businesses, both big and small, to be able to cut costs by using solar power.

Reply

dbreneman

2 Comments

  • 1981 Days Ago
  • 09/12/2006

Re: Nice, but will it really make a difference?

I guess people are so used to seeing alternative energy sources as costly and inefficient that they just reflexively assume that such energy systems must be forced on the people by the government. :-)

Reply

morris

1 Comment

  • 1979 Days Ago
  • 09/14/2006

Re: Nice, but will it really make a difference?

Actually most of us get started with PV as a two part process. The first step is putting the receptacle/lighting house circuits on a battery/inverter/battery charger system. This is done so that when the utility power goes away (either by storm, car hitting a pole, utility overload, etc.) you keep your lights, TV, fans (in the summer) all up and working. Second step is: as the cost of PV comes down, you start to add panels. (OK, so you jump the gun like I did and put the panels on at $5/watt) but they need to be around $1/watt to be cost effective without any incentives which is where we should have been a long time ago. (Boy do I have stories to tell about DOE - getting all us high-brows laid-off).

Its great when the neighbors come over and ask why we have the only house for miles around that has lights (I turn on all the lights and light up the house up like a power plant) My average outage time is four hours - in the middle of town!

Reply

thegreenbuilder

1 Comment

  • 1942 Days Ago
  • 10/21/2006

Re: Nice, but will it really make a difference?

Are you serious????

"What does the government have to do with this?"

I find it hard to believe anyone in the renewable energy field or sustaianable design field would ask such a naive question.

Government, especially United States government, has it's hands on the wheel...and has for at least the last 120 years...ever since the industrial revolution, really.

So if we REALLY want this technology to be a success, we must VOTE with our DOLLARS.  We must support the supply/demand cycle while simultaneously VOTE to get the right people in office and KEEP THEM THERE.  It's really a very complex issue.

We know it's not as simple as providing a breakthru technology...it's not as simple as voting the right member of Congress to office...it's not living in the right State with the right incentives...it's not teaching our children that fossil fuel consumption is ANTIQUATED and BAD....it's all those together and more.

I for one applaud this new NANOTECH solar...it sounds good on paper....I hope it makes it thru the gauntlet that is "Modern America"

Reply

markdumond

1 Comment

  • 1981 Days Ago
  • 09/12/2006

Way to go

This is great news! I'm totally solar today with a 4.1kw system. The cost was large but worth it. Hopefully this will bring the cost down significantly. I've got plenty of room if they need someone to try the product in a real life setting!

Reply

randman420

6 Comments

  • 1961 Days Ago
  • 10/02/2006

Re: Way to go

I am in total agreement with you. I think solar is making leaps and bounds (that sound kind of funny when I write it)but I think the advances are fantastic and just in time. Global Warming is really scary, especially when it comes to my kids!

Reply

Advertisement

MAGAZINE

Can We Build Tomorrow's Breakthroughs?

Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.

Videos

Printing Parts

More

Advertisement

Technology Review Lists

TR50

Our list of the 50 most innovative companies, including the following:

eSolar

Geron

Complete Genomics

Google

More

Advertisement

Facebook

Advertisement