The Chinese Solar Machine Layer by Layer Fire in the Library The Mystery Behind Anesthesia
(Page 2 of 2)
The downside of batteries using the new material is that they have less energy capacity than those typically used in laptops today. A123's batteries, for instance, have been engineered for applications in which safety and quick bursts of power are more important, such as for power tools. This power comes partly from the nature of the material; however, making the electrodes thin also helps. So engineering batteries with thicker electrodes can increase capacity.
Although safer lithium-ion batteries could be adapted for mobile devices, a re-engineered battery would still have less runtime than users now expect in their laptops and cell phones. The lower capacity, however, can be offset, to some extent, especially in cell phones, by faster charging times made possible by the new chemistry, says A123 founder and VP of business development Ric Fulop. Although the battery would be exhausted faster, it could be recharged during a break in a meeting or at a layover in an airport. Fulop says their batteries also maintain capacity over more charge/discharge cycles, extending their useful life.
Currently, A123 is focused on power tool and hybrid vehicle markets, where high power is essential. But Valence, whose batteries run the Segway personal transport vehicle, has been talking to laptop manufacturers about adapting laptops to use their batteries, says vice president of marketing Dean Bogues. So far, however, computer makers haven't taken the bait. "The hurdle they've had is, who's going to be the first to give up energy capacity to go with a safer technology?"
With the recent headline news of massive recalls and continuing worries over the safety of more traditional lithium-ion batteries, though, some may begin to change their thinking.
Market leaders Dell and Apple should collude in Safety!
Business collusion is illegal in the U.S., but safety collusion is not! Amazingly, the words “Lithium Ion” has a brand value to the public, but two of its larger computer distributors failed to catch the dysfunctional batteries which they placed in the open market.
Together they have lowered the brand value of this still emerging product component, and likely hurt the other products brand value which dependent upon this component, like cell phones and other laptops. This can be seen in Qantas airline’s band of ALL Dell and Mac batteries in-flight use along with the massive recall of Apple’s Laptop batteries.
But since neither of them exclusively owns the name “Lithium-Ion” why should they care?
Collusion for safety standard is almost necessary for possibly dangerous emerging component or product categories, because as I put it “any one player in the game can kick the ball out of the field for everyone, and end the game.”
The brand name of “Lithium-Ion” is tarnished and it will take several months for the publics confident in this new component to come back. The lesson here is that for possibly dangerous emerging high tech components, safety infractions can hurt every company using that component, and that safety collusion for standard is the better than having someone else’s mistake affect your product.
Ideally this can be done by enforcing safety testing to place a safety standard trademark on your component. Also, I see this as being a necessity in emerging markets like Robotics.
Then again, “When the going gets hot, the hot ones logoff!”
Brian Glassman
Innovation Management
Commercialization of technology
http://www.smh.com.au/news/biztech/safety-first-for-carryon-dells/2006/08/23/1156012601607.html
Re: Market leaders Dell and Apple should collude in Safety!
This is just dell and apples way of sell more units
Guest (roba)
The "solution" "found" by Chiang et al. was first brought to light by, I hate to tell you, the reseachers in Sony. Olivines was suggested by Goodenough years ago but the first practical cell was made in Sony (yes the company which made explosive batteries) and published in 2001. Thereafter did Chiang and gangs come to the scene,
just to set the record straight.
if you want more knowledge about lithium ion battery,you can visit:http://www.lithium-batteries.net
Actual, Lithium-ion battery isn't very terrible.
Lithium-Ion batteries are longer lived than conventional batteries and do not require replacement as often. Commonly, it has internal circuit board with chips that allow it to communicate with the notebook to monitor battery performance, output voltage and temperature. It also gives the notebook much more accurate 'fuel gauge' capability to determine how much battery runtime is left before the next recharge is required. Actually, all the battery distributors know the importance of overcharge protection and overheat switch, so the issued lithium-ion batteries can be safely used.
What are the reasons that cause battery with no voltage or low voltage?
No voltage.
External shot circuit or overcharge, anti-charge
Cells expansion and short circuit caused by direct anode contact and continuous high efficiency electric current overcharging.
It can be avoided by:
Checking if the battery is without voltage or electric current
Avoiding short circuit
Avoiding collision and pressure among batteries
Charging the battery after it automatically powers off, then full charge the battery.
Manufacturing in the United States is in trouble. That's bad news not just for the country's economy but for the future of innovation.
joseparc
3 Comments
Airline Security
After reading the article and watching the Valence video, I asked myself if I was going to feel safer the next time I got on an airplane knowing the guy on my left had to throw away his shampoo and toothpaste before he boarded but seeing the guy on my right still using his Dell laptop.
Reply