A second-generation design squeezes the process into a single glass block: light beaming through the top of the block reflects off primary mirrors shaped into the bottom face, up to secondary mirrors shaped into the top face, and back to one-millimeter-square photovoltaic cells popped into the center of the primary mirrors.
Whereas silicon solar panels today cost close to $3 per watt to produce, Conley says SolFocus will manufacture solar systems at $2 per watt when it opens its first concentrator plant next year; and he says gigawatt-scale production will cut the cost per watt to just 50 cents. The second generation should cut costs further, says Conley, to as low as 32 cents per watt.
Despite these optimistic claims, though, SolFocus will have plenty of competition. Robert McConnell at the U.S. Department of Energy, and an expert on concentrated photovoltaics, says SolFocus must not only prove its technology but also outperform a growing field of competitors. "They've got at least three dozen competitors, including companies that have many more years of development," says McConnell.
Indeed, SolFocus's toughest competition could come from the world's largest photovoltaic manufacturer, Japan-based Sharp, which has developed a concentrator using Fresnel lenses -- the same basic technology used to amplify the signal beam in lighthouses. Sharp's system employs an array of such lenses in a single block of relatively cheap injection-molded plastic.
The DOE's McConnell says the most critical test for concentrators will be durability. In concentrator photovoltaic's first period of development in the 1970s and 1980s the technology suffered from a series of disasters, akin to the flying blades and broken gearboxes that bedeviled wind power's pioneers. Sulfur in the air eroded mirrors. Hail and wind smashed delicate lenses. Dust jammed the tracking devices needed to keep the systems targeted on the sun. And in the worst cases damaged systems posed serious fire hazards.
SolFocus' self-contained devices should be less susceptible to damage and safer than their predecessors, claims Conley. Nevertheless, they're targeting large field-based solar power plants for their first rollouts, and leaving the more lucrative commercial rooftop market for later on.
Comments
08/02/2006
Posts:1
08/02/2006
Posts:1
08/02/2006
Posts:1
smuie
08/28/2006
Posts:1
08/02/2006
Posts:1
Thanks,
Rob
08/02/2006
Posts:1
08/02/2006
Posts:1
08/02/2006
Posts:1
08/02/2006
Posts:1
08/02/2006
Posts:1
08/03/2006
Posts:1
Knock, Knock are there any working brains out there?
08/02/2006
Posts:1
08/02/2006
Posts:1
08/02/2006
Posts:1
One of the strongest advantages of PV is it's distributed energy supply. Already our energy grid is overwealmed with the energy demand. I have been talking with customers throughout the US that are getting blackout warnings due to the large use of air conditioning. The surges of energy use are primarily during the day, when the sun is hottest.
PV technology can suppliment existing energy technologies and is certainly complimentary to existing technology.
Future generations of solar technology are developing rapidly and I wouldn't be surprised to see PV cells getting > 50% efficiency relatively soon.
08/02/2006
Posts:1
08/02/2006
Posts:1
garywildd
07/11/2007
Posts:3
08/02/2006
Posts:1
08/02/2006
Posts:1
08/02/2006
Posts:1
08/02/2006
Posts:1
08/02/2006
Posts:1
08/02/2006
Posts:1
08/02/2006
Posts:1
08/02/2006
Posts:1
08/03/2006
Posts:1
Obviousman
09/06/2006
Posts:2
garywildd
07/11/2007
Posts:3
1) architectural: PV panels become the roof or skylight, not just an add-on
2) electrical: DC from PV powers electronics directly, instead of converting to AC then back to DC
3) economically: realtime pricing for electricity matches PV supply to power demand. They both peak on sunny days!
08/02/2006
Posts:1
08/02/2006
Posts:1
08/02/2006
Posts:1
If that's really what you think, you have not done your homework. Read the recent scholarly work on this topic. The rise and fall of nations grinds out over generations. To assign it to a decade simply because it was a hot media topic is... myopic.
magnetrain
02/28/2007
Posts:3
Lets face it - our US infrastructure absolutely sucks! Its obsolete, over burdened and on shakey ground. Our roads and bridges are buckling, rusting etc. Anything an individual can do to unplug from it will be better for the individual. We need a new political group in Washington that can take the New Deal Approach to building up our Nation again. Oh - I forgot! We already sold our steel mills to the Russians and Chinese and the local-boys really speak Spanish.
Novemeber can't come soon enough.
08/04/2006
Posts:1
garywildd
07/11/2007
Posts:3
08/02/2006
Posts:1
08/02/2006
Posts:1
As far as using solar, it is use renewables, lower CO2 or die. I guess that will make it economical.
08/03/2006
Posts:1
powerfinalis...
10/25/2006
Posts:2
08/03/2006
Posts:1
http://Green-Homes.com
08/05/2006
Posts:1
08/15/2006
Posts:1
08/10/2006
Posts:1
pv.suresh
09/07/2006
Posts:1
fireofenergy
10/12/2006
Posts:4
powerfinalis...
10/25/2006
Posts:2
"RE" is renewable energy and I never thought there was a better way to make a global sunshade than by use of the same billion or so mirrors that would generate RE juice... I hear they (OPEC) are going to buy us out...
fireofenergy
05/28/2008
Posts:4
bb14
02/22/2007
Posts:1
Thanks,
Nick
liftedresear...
06/14/2007
Posts:1