Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

A Sharper Focus for Photovoltaics

Continued from page 1

By Peter Fairley

Wednesday, August 02, 2006

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

A second-generation design squeezes the process into a single glass block: light beaming through the top of the block reflects off primary mirrors shaped into the bottom face, up to secondary mirrors shaped into the top face, and back to one-millimeter-square photovoltaic cells popped into the center of the primary mirrors.

Whereas silicon solar panels today cost close to $3 per watt to produce, Conley says SolFocus will manufacture solar systems at $2 per watt when it opens its first concentrator plant next year; and he says gigawatt-scale production will cut the cost per watt to just 50 cents. The second generation should cut costs further, says Conley, to as low as 32 cents per watt.

Despite these optimistic claims, though, SolFocus will have plenty of competition. Robert McConnell at the U.S. Department of Energy, and an expert on concentrated photovoltaics, says SolFocus must not only prove its technology but also outperform a growing field of competitors. "They've got at least three dozen competitors, including companies that have many more years of development," says McConnell.

Indeed, SolFocus's toughest competition could come from the world's largest photovoltaic manufacturer, Japan-based Sharp, which has developed a concentrator using Fresnel lenses -- the same basic technology used to amplify the signal beam in lighthouses. Sharp's system employs an array of such lenses in a single block of relatively cheap injection-molded plastic.

The DOE's McConnell says the most critical test for concentrators will be durability. In concentrator photovoltaic's first period of development in the 1970s and 1980s the technology suffered from a series of disasters, akin to the flying blades and broken gearboxes that bedeviled wind power's pioneers. Sulfur in the air eroded mirrors. Hail and wind smashed delicate lenses. Dust jammed the tracking devices needed to keep the systems targeted on the sun. And in the worst cases damaged systems posed serious fire hazards.

SolFocus' self-contained devices should be less susceptible to damage and safer than their predecessors, claims Conley. Nevertheless, they're targeting large field-based solar power plants for their first rollouts, and leaving the more lucrative commercial rooftop market for later on.

Comments

  • is this real?
    if this is for real, it is perhaps the biggest quantum jump in solar power in years! but how do you keep the cells from burning, or melting, with such an increase in light intensity? and how long can they live, with such wide swings of temperature as from strong sun at a 500 fold increase to a cold night? but if this does work, it is a new world.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (kitk)
    08/02/2006
    Posts:1
    • too hot?
      We selected 500 suns as the optimal between cost-peerformance-reliability and passive cooling. In fact, the cells only heat to 25C over ambient. As the are type III/V, with Ge as substrate, they lose just 3% overall efficiency at 100C, which we should never reach. As to surviuveability, similiar cells used in LumiLEDS, can tolerate junction temperatures of 185C. As to thermal shock, the mass of the solid dielectric prevents rapid transients.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (gc)
      08/02/2006
      Posts:1
      • Focus!
        sorry for the numerous typos!
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (gc)
        08/02/2006
        Posts:1
    • Re: is this real? sort of
      hardly a breakthrough.  Boeing has been building the GAs chips for decades for sattelites.   Mnay business cases to concentrate were snuffed by investors...until venyure funds declared energy a new technology.   Solfocus is merely buying Boeing Spectralab chips and putting them in a small concentrator.   $4/watt is hardly compelling.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      smuie
      08/28/2006
      Posts:1
  • focus on the big picture
    The technical points kitk mentions are valid.  It will be interesting to see how the tracking mechanisms withstand.  This company will have to contend with many competitors indeed.  Some examples of competing technologies are spray on photovoltaics, nanocrystals, and perhaps most interestingly, quantum dots, which have been reported to displace 6 (or 7?) electrons for a single photon.  I imagine that this market is going to heat up like the sun in the next decade.  Enough of the bad puns, time to bask in the sweet rays of technology.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (jonathan)
    08/02/2006
    Posts:1
    • quantum dots and efficiency
      One of the big problems with solar power besides cost is the physical space needed.  I don't know the figures for W/m^2, but I know that a Gigawatt installation would be pretty big.  However after reading the article about cheaper IR detectors, I wondered if quantum dots might make cells more efficient and thus smaller but reacting to a broad spectrum of photons, rather than a narrow band.  Thoughts?

      Thanks,
      Rob
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Rob)
      08/02/2006
      Posts:1
      • quantum dots and efficiency
        QD enhanced solar cels are already under development and showing promise.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (dennis)
        08/02/2006
        Posts:1
  • Humbug I say
    Solar power is still for suckers, and will be for a long time.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Amulek)
    08/02/2006
    Posts:1
    • Point
      Yes, very good point.  I particularly like the way you have explored the point in such detail leaving little for anyone to disagree with.  I think we need more explainations like yours.  Have you considered a career in teaching or diplomacy?
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Bravid)
      08/02/2006
      Posts:1
      • Amulek's grandfather...
        ...told Henry Ford to give up. After all, no one would want an expensive, dangerous, and dirty vehicle that you have to crank to start. Thanks, Amulek, for reminding us that no one should try to invent anything.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (Tysto)
        08/02/2006
        Posts:1
    • Yes. Suckers, ideed.
      I agree. In fact *infinitely* long, if no one persues it.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Sean)
      08/03/2006
      Posts:1
  • Already done in the mid-50's
    We are just reinventing the wheel?
    Knock, Knock are there any working brains out there?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Jonathan 2)
    08/02/2006
    Posts:1
    • Read the article on Geothermal
      Geothermal is the most promising alternative source for energy.  IT is constant, is virtually inexhaustable, and if not bungled by bureaucrats, can be very inexpensive.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Bill)
      08/02/2006
      Posts:1
      • [no subject]
        I don’t think the bureaucrats will screw it up (much), but the “Earth Mother” crowd already sees geothermal development as Gaia rape. The myths are out there already, the best one so far; “Using the Earths crust to heat water will cool the core & destroy the planet”. Any large scale geothermal implementation will have to go through the courts.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (Chris)
        08/02/2006
        Posts:1
      • true today
        Geothermal is certainly a promising tech primarily due to it's constant energy supply.  PV on the other hand, does have some advantages.

        One of the strongest advantages of PV is it's distributed energy supply.  Already our energy grid is overwealmed with the energy demand.  I have been talking with customers throughout the US that are getting blackout warnings due to the large use of air conditioning.  The surges of energy use are primarily during the day, when the sun is hottest. 

        PV technology can suppliment existing energy technologies and is certainly complimentary to existing technology. 

        Future generations of solar technology are developing rapidly and I wouldn't be surprised to see PV cells getting > 50% efficiency relatively soon. 
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (Jonathan)
        08/02/2006
        Posts:1
      • problem is,,,
        practically speaking, someone will ALWAYS try to stop any new developement--even if helps us all. Geothermal will attract luddites, and remember this: it requires a large steam plant to run. PV can use inverters to attach to any home's power.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (kitk)
        08/02/2006
        Posts:1
      • Re: Read the article on Geothermal
        This is ridiculous. Solar IS inexhaustible, it is available and predictable worldwide, including oceans, the atmosphere and space, it causes no emissions, it recoups it energy cost in a few months, and it's decentralized, i.e. doesn't need a grid. For all these reasons solar will take the developing world (where 90% of the world's people live) by storm, much like cell phones have. Once again it looks like the US will have to cede leadership of solar to Europe and Japan.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        garywildd
        07/11/2007
        Posts:3
  • Solar and geothermal not competitive
    I agree geothermal should be the technology to pursue, but for off-the-grid applications solar can make a big contribution.  Every home will not have its own geo-well 2 miles deep.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Frank Carraro)
    08/02/2006
    Posts:1
    • True but..
      The potential to have geo-wells (given tech advances) in more areas close to off-the-grid locations is very feasible
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Bill)
      08/02/2006
      Posts:1
    • Re: Solar and geothermal not competitive
      I agree that solar and geothermal energy is not competitive in that their are limits as to how much energy transmission lines can carry. Home production of energy from solar during times when its most needed e.g.. "daytime hours" for cooling homes, can complement energy distributed across transmission lines. Solar doesn't seem like it can be a substitute, and at best only complement existing or future systems.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Keith)
      08/02/2006
      Posts:1
  • mistake?
    Last paragraph of 1st page reads "SolFocus' current, first-generation design molds an array of 635 one-square-centimeter primary mirrors into a glass plate. Secondary mirrors attached above them reflect light through holes in the plate onto one-centimeter-square high-efficiency cells below."  Shouldn't the high-efficiency cells be 1 mm squared?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (dmm)
    08/02/2006
    Posts:1
    • No
      I think the mirror array is 635 mirrors, each 1 sq cm, sitting over a PV cell that is also 1 sq cm. If they're 20% efficient at it, that accounts for the 500 suns GC mentioned above.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Tysto)
      08/02/2006
      Posts:1
      • 80%, not 20%
        I meant the 635 mirrors need to be 80% efficient to focus 500 suns onto a like-sized PV cell.
        Rate this comment: 12345
        Guest (Tysto)
        08/02/2006
        Posts:1
        • 635-square centimeters
          Our bad: The size of EACH primary mirror in the first-generation system is 635 square centimeters. My apologies for the confusion.
          Rate this comment: 12345
          Guest (Peter Fairley)
          08/02/2006
          Posts:1
  • A look on the sunny side of life
    Just in case that any of our fire-loving Neanderthal cousins out there still haven't noticed, we are living in a 'solar system.' As 'Third Rock From The Sun,' our unique position in this relatively modest group of planets allows us to enjoy the virtually unlimited amounts of clean renewable energy that this mid-sized, type GO yellow star is capable of producing completely free of charge. If, in fact, we could harness the amount of energy which falls upon the earth contained in the form of sunlight in just one hour, it would be roughly equal to the same amount of potential energy created by the combustion of 200,000,000 tons of bituminous coal. Embracing the benefits that can result from using photovoltaic technology to our advantage is the wave of the future. Get used to it.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (william eady)
    08/02/2006
    Posts:1
    • Free of charge?
      Did we time warp back to 1960? The technology to harness this "free energy" is not free!  There are also those pesky things called clouds, smog and shadows.  Oh and by the way photovoltaic technology has been the wave of the future since the 1930's. 
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Neanderthal)
      08/03/2006
      Posts:1
      • Re: Free of charge?
        How exactly do you figure that PV has been the wave of the future since the 1930's?  The first solar cell was created in the mid 50's.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        Obviousman
        09/06/2006
        Posts:2
      • Re: Free of charge?
        What exactly is your point? When did the Sun send you a bill? And so it takes a century to assure unlimited clean power for everyone. So what??
        Rate this comment: 12345

        garywildd
        07/11/2007
        Posts:3
  • Looks like progress, and let's integrate solar . . .
    This is one more line of progress.  And the entire PV industry would benefit from 3 dimensions of integration:
    1) architectural: PV panels become the roof or skylight, not just an add-on
    2) electrical: DC from PV powers electronics directly, instead of converting to AC then back to DC
    3) economically:  realtime pricing for electricity matches PV supply to power demand.  They both peak on sunny days!
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Mark Shapiro)
    08/02/2006
    Posts:1
  • So what? We'll just lose this industry too.
    Japan is already in there.  With their government industrial policy they'll just muscle any US companies out of the way.  One day it'll be just another technology that the US had a lead in but lost the industry due to piss poor or non-existent planning.  The acolytes of the market will propagandize it as the best of progress.  Meantime the rest of us will have to aspire to scaling the heights of hair styling.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Bruce Considine)
    08/02/2006
    Posts:1
    • [no subject]
      The "Japan, Inc." argument is SOOOO 1980s.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (BBTG)
      08/02/2006
      Posts:1
      • Re:
        "The 'Japan, Inc.' argument is SOOOO 1980s."

        If that's really what you think, you have not done your homework.  Read the recent scholarly work on this topic.  The rise and fall of nations grinds out over generations.  To assign it to a decade simply because it was a hot media topic is... myopic.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        magnetrain
        02/28/2007
        Posts:3
    • Losing this Industrial Opportunity
      This November you can send a message to our leaders that we need systems like this to offset our poor national power grid. As for Japanese (or Asian more correctly) we can stand up to them, organize our bsinesses and make sure US products are used here as opposed to importing them. Afterall. Even if the panel is made overseas by a US corporation, you still need to have a local-boy (or girl) install them.

      Lets face it - our US infrastructure absolutely sucks! Its obsolete, over burdened and on shakey ground. Our roads and bridges are buckling, rusting etc. Anything an individual can do to unplug from it will be better for the individual. We need a new political group in Washington that can take the New Deal Approach to building up our Nation again. Oh - I forgot! We already sold our steel mills to the Russians and Chinese and the local-boys really speak Spanish.

      Novemeber can't come soon enough.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (Mike)
      08/04/2006
      Posts:1
    • Re: So what? We'll just lose this industry too.
      Totally... well put. But we'll always be tops in the technology of killing. Yell louder than hell and carry a big nuke.. worked for Truman, right? LOL.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      garywildd
      07/11/2007
      Posts:3
  • concentrated sunlight is hot
    can we use it as a weapon to kill people with?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (GWB)
    08/02/2006
    Posts:1
    • kill ray?
      sure, it's done all the time. called skin cancer. seriously, this focusing tech is for very small scale targets. a greater danger is from the electricity, should you get tangled in the wires. but everything is dangerous, so let us be bold enough to embrace our future.
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest (kitk)
      08/02/2006
      Posts:1
  • Another company makes Solar roof tiles
    Open Energy.(OEGY) makes solar roofing tiles that can be installed by any roofer.  They also make the SV panels.  Open has a concentrator technology under development but it is for large power generation by heating and should be much better than using mirrors for that purpose.
    As far as using solar, it is use renewables, lower CO2 or die.  I guess that will make it economical.
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Ron)
    08/03/2006
    Posts:1
    • Re: Another company makes Solar roof tiles
      The pure 1st cost economics must make sense or no one will buy it.  2nd and 3rd level issues like CO2 build up dont factor in unless the primary costs are tied.  (By the way, CO2 "global warming" can be very cost effectively controlled by placing a few hundred hectares of Iranian and Syrian soil into the upper atmosphere)
      Rate this comment: 12345

      powerfinalis...
      10/25/2006
      Posts:2
  • Pictures or diagrams would help
    When can I go to Lowe's and buy them?  What kind of battery/inverter setup would I need to use them? 
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Ben)
    08/03/2006
    Posts:1
  • Solar Concentrator Systems
    This technology is advancing quickly, so by combining nano technology with solar concentators, I predict solar will explode as prices drop in half and output doubles.

    http://Green-Homes.com
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Green-Homes.com)
    08/05/2006
    Posts:1
    • [no subject]
      How does one go about combining nanotechnology with concentrators? What do you mean?
      Rate this comment: 12345
      Guest
      08/15/2006
      Posts:1
  • Concentrators don't work in cloudy weather?
    Isn't it true that concentrators don't work well in cloudy weather. The suns rays are mostly scattered to the side and not on the solar cells? So would such a concentrator cell be only really useable in desert climates? That's a bit of a limited market?
    Rate this comment: 12345
    Guest (Ben Wiens)
    08/10/2006
    Posts:1
  • series resistance
    There is also a problem of series resistance in concentrators.... Special care should be taken to reduce the series resistance of concentrator PV cells and modules.....
    Rate this comment: 12345

    pv.suresh
    09/07/2006
    Posts:1
  • To prove a point or two...
    I created a poster that, among other things (global warming), depicts the Earth as 78 pixels, and the overly large sun, at 100 times that. Nobody can convince me that we have to succumb to post oil crisis. There is more energy in the wind and (feable) sunlight than thousands of fossil fuel supplies. Just one such is overheating the world (4-D glacial observation). It (poster), is only in cyberspace, as the real, more detailed version, I can't yet afford to produce. The text is availabe online and I want everyone who cares about putting a STOP to global warming to do something to spread awareness. Now may be too soon to actually build a full blown RE infrstucture, though. With rapid advancements like mass produced glass/mirror/CPV, like this, An intire infrastructure could be deemed obsolete! A careful gamble should be enacted upon which is the best timing to actually petition governments throughout the world to make laws to build exponential RE farms. Petition them now instead to fund research to advance the cheapest way to collect RE and tell all!
    Rate this comment: 12345

    fireofenergy
    10/12/2006
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
    • Re: To prove a point or two...
      What is "RE"?  Also remember that Global Warming can quickly and cost effectively be stopped by placing a few hundred hectares of Iranian and Syrian soil into the upper atmosphere,  The increase in global radioactivity would be less per year than one visit to a therapeutic radon cave.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      powerfinalis...
      10/25/2006
      Posts:2
      • Re: To prove a point or two...
        Boy, am I late...
        "RE" is renewable energy and I never thought there was a better way to make a global sunshade than by use of the same billion or so mirrors that would generate RE juice... I hear they (OPEC) are going to buy us out...
        Rate this comment: 12345

        fireofenergy
        05/28/2008
        Posts:4
        Avg Rating:
        1/5
  • Government's role...
    ...in encouraging any new technology should be by providing enough financial incentive (whether it be through direct participation or tax relief...) to cause industry and individuals alike enough empetus to purchase and use the technology.  While we may decry our current administration's position on the environment, please consider for a moment that in the case of PV installations, this administration has done something that no other has: 1) removed any potential ceiling or cap, and 2) guaranteed a 30% participation of the RETAIL cost of the project.  When married to RE quota requirements imposed by states on utilities (and resulting in additional incentives from those sources...) PV installations are now not only socially viable, but are fast approaching economic viability as well.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    bb14
    02/22/2007
    Posts:1
  • well.. what about subsidies?
    I am enthusiastic about the possibility of the economic feasibly of solar energy not just on a large commercial scale but also for individuals who wish to reduce their dependence ot the evil electricity monopolies. More importantly, I wonder if any of you brilliant tech savvy individuals know of new programs in Europe that provide incentives and tax breaks for use of Solar energies. I realize already that there are a number of programs in place especially in Germany, France and Spain however, this process is ongoing and I’m unaware of new policy. If anybody knows of a website that gives updates on alternative energy programs both in the U.S. and worldwide I’d be forever grateful
    Thanks,
    Nick
    Rate this comment: 12345

    liftedresear...
    06/14/2007
    Posts:1

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement

Videos

Laser-Triggered Chemical Reactions
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's daily e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES

More Technology News from Forbes

Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology © 2009 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.