These rate of adoption numbers, which Heywood says are borne out by the rate with which efficient diesel engines have spread over the last 25 years in Europe, suggest that short-term changes in fuel consumption must come not from the development of new technologies, but from the wiser use of existing ones. "We don't have any options other than to reduce the energy requirement in a major way," he says. Consumers should buy smaller vehicles that use less gas, drive slower and for shorter distances, and optimize fuel economy by staying on top of routine maintenance, such as keeping their tires inflated properly.
Heywood admits these ideas might not be rapidly adopted: "It's not American to conserve. We seem to have drifted into that attitude. Our culture doesn't bring us up to think about conserving. It brings us up to think about consuming."
Heywood says changes in behavior, however, could be encouraged in several ways. Crackdowns on speeding would save gas. High prices at the pump help some, but prices at the time of vehicle purchases are also important. Heywood suggests that, in addition to toughening government fuel economy standards, which would give manufacturers more incentive to make vehicles that use less gas, consumers should be awarded rebates when buying smaller, more economical cars, as well as be assessed extra fees when buying gas-guzzlers.
He also thinks a higher gas tax could be palatable, if presented correctly. The money could go into the highway trust fund, which he says is now suffering, providing a justification for the tax beyond just penalizing drivers. Since such a tax would be highly regressive, disproportionately affecting the poor, who might get stuck driving used SUVs, for example, Heywood also proposes a selective reduction in their income taxes to compensate.
Meanwhile, petroleum-based fuel consumption continues to increase, in the United States and other major countries such as India and China. "We can do something about this -- but can we on a global level get down to below what we're consuming now? That's an unbelievable challenge," Heywood says.
Comments
The Prof needs to let the tax concerns to the politicians and work on a system that helps the overall situation. He has the education and know how to change the fuel consumption problem mechanically, through devising a better machine. This is what we need..
Dennis
05/05/2006
Posts:1
05/05/2006
Posts:1
I believe Hybrid technology will begin to take a serious foothold in the market. Up until now, the additional cost just wasn't worth it but with gas prices climbing and people sayiong the days of gasoline under $2 are gone for ever, people will be searching for 40-50 MPG
Plus, the manufacturers are making normal looking cars with the tech, not just that funky looking Prius!
05/05/2006
Posts:1
would translate to more goods transported. This obviouly did not work
05/07/2006
Posts:1
05/05/2006
Posts:1
05/05/2006
Posts:1
05/09/2006
Posts:1
eather that or when oil hits $200.00 a barrel thats when the market will turn to alternitive sources
youngandgeek...
09/15/2008
Posts:1
Whereas most energy resources, oil in the ground as a prime example, could be thought of as money in the bank, Hydrogen is but a check to get that money out of the bank.
My real point is that Hydrogen R&D priorities are way out of whack. There is way too much emphasis on end-use technologies at the expense of developing a low-cost source. One example is thermochemical splitting of water using nuclear heat as an energy source.
05/06/2006
Posts:1
05/08/2006
Posts:1
Concerning the use of Hydrogen as a gasoline replacement, that is pure fantasy. Hydrogen can only be produced by electrolysis or from hydrocarbons. Electrolysis needs energy, and using hydrocarbons leaves us where we are now.
05/05/2006
Posts:1
favorable sources. Windpower is ideally suited for producing hydrogen, as it's less suited to adding power to the electricity grids due
to it's unreliable timeliness.
The technology is within reach. The leadership needed to make the
commitment is virtually non-existant. Our self-important
press, who think they're so educated, are ignorant on energy matters. The politicians today are
of the lowest quality, and are capable of nothing better than legislative stagnation, at best.
05/05/2006
Posts:1
www.hydrogenpowerinc.com
05/07/2006
Posts:1
www.hydrogenpowerinc.com
does not need a compressed gas cylinder. I think this is sooo cool. All you need to do is go to a 711 hand in your old canisiter of
aluminumoxide and buy a canister of aluminum power add that to your car add water and drive away
05/07/2006
Posts:1
If this technology is practical,
that obsoletes my statement.
That is encouraging indeed.
How far away is this technology?
When will the first vehicles and
stationary generators based on
this technology go to market?
If I sound impatient, I am.
I want to know if this "Hydrogen
Now" product is compelling enough
for a major manufacturer to begin
using it.
06/04/2006
Posts:1
05/05/2006
Posts:1
05/05/2006
Posts:1
Legitimate need=towing a boat or RV, building a house. To take 10 kids to soccer practice, use a minivan.
Similarly, why not bike or bus to work, own no car, and rent a sedan for road trips?
05/12/2006
Posts:1
07/18/2006
Posts:1
05/05/2006
Posts:1
05/07/2006
Posts:1
05/05/2006
Posts:1
05/07/2006
Posts:1
05/12/2006
Posts:1
05/05/2006
Posts:1
05/05/2006
Posts:1
What's so magic about having ALL our hydrocarbons replaced? You seriously believe hydrogen is useless until then? I have read that hydrogen in cars increase power and mileage up to 15% at a ratio of 15:1. Just lookup hydroboosting. In fact I think all cars should have that built in because it's a well known technique, can run on cars unmodified and I wouldn't be surprised if we could supply that much fuel to all cars with current alternative power sources.
05/05/2006
Posts:1
05/07/2006
Posts:1
05/05/2006
Posts:1
05/11/2006
Posts:1
However, gasoline is neither as volatile nor as explosive as hydrogen, and it isn't a gas.
That's one of a thousand reasons why gasoline is the ideal fuel that it is.
The point is, how do you dispense hydrogen? Do you want your grandma fitting a 5000 psi hydrogen hose to her fill pipe?
Given the choice of hydrogen or a recharge of a Li-ion battery pack, I'd take the battery pack every time. And I hate batteries.
Heywood's point--and it's an excellent one--is that hydrogen is not a FUEL, sillies. It's the equivalent of a battery, and at present it's a terrible choice for a battery.
05/12/2006
Posts:1
05/05/2006
Posts:1
05/05/2006
Posts:1
05/05/2006
Posts:1
http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue51/papp.html
05/07/2006
Posts:1
05/07/2006
Posts:1
see > sorganol.com < or search > sorganol < this is truely a 'green fuel',, LFM
05/05/2006
Posts:1
05/05/2006
Posts:1
05/07/2006
Posts:1
05/05/2006
Posts:1
05/05/2006
Posts:1
05/07/2006
Posts:1
1 - Methanol is only made on very small non-commercial scale using electroreduction of carbon dioxide. Methanol is made on a mass commercial scale via steam/methane reforming to produce synthesis gas which is then converted to CH3OH using proprietary catalyst from Lurgi, Davy, or Sud (among other). The feedstock is ALWAYS hydrocarbon.
2 - Brazil has no such "Methanol Economy". Brazil has an ETHANOL Economy. If you don't know the difference between ethanol and methanol see Google for help.
rivsys
11/29/2006
Posts:1
05/05/2006
Posts:1
05/07/2006
Posts:1
05/08/2006
Posts:1
05/07/2006
Posts:1
08/10/2006
Posts:1
Mass requires energy to move it.
More mass = more energy / more energy = more fuel / More fuel = more emissions. High power density has to be design into the complete vehicle. At this point less than 2% of the thermal energy from your gallon of gasoline is actually used to drive a person from one side of town to the other. New vehicles with high power density engines and light/strong vehicle design with high utility in space for total vehicle efficiency is what is needed. Start with a compact Pivotal ICE switchable between CNG/hydrogen or CNG/gasoline then design the ideal vehicle to match and real progress, that the public will embrace, can be made. www.pivotalengine.com
The commercial potential is huge and the improvement in fuel economy of real value to national security. Not to mention that it presents the long term answer for the introduction and sustainability of hydrogen powered transportation. MIT, we would welcome you on board.
05/07/2006
Posts:1
05/08/2006
Posts:1
I dont think theyre involved in these activities out of a sense of environmental responsibility - maybe profits?
05/08/2006
Posts:1
05/08/2006
Posts:1
He claims 80 MPG.
05/08/2006
Posts:1
05/09/2006
Posts:1
http://freeenergynews.com/news/index.html
05/10/2006
Posts:1
05/30/2006
Posts:1